Re: Server-Problem

2003-03-08 Thread Malte Cornils
Hello Manfred, hello Branden, hello *, I'll try to translate this request for help. On Saturday, 8. March 2003 00:49, Manfred Storch wrote: > Hello, > > I do not know if this is the right place to ask, but I will try. > > After configuration with XF86Config, the new settings are supposed to be >

Re: [desktop] Unix configuration nightmare

2002-10-24 Thread Malte Cornils
Hi, On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 12:19:20PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > 2. It might be interesting to develop either colorized vim or emacs > > modes that were invoked when editing only-partially-editable files, such > > that the "hands-off" part appeared, say, in some distinct color. > > A ni

Re: Server-Problem

2003-03-08 Thread Malte Cornils
Hello Manfred, hello Branden, hello *, I'll try to translate this request for help. On Saturday, 8. March 2003 00:49, Manfred Storch wrote: > Hello, > > I do not know if this is the right place to ask, but I will try. > > After configuration with XF86Config, the new settings are supposed to be >

.xsession and kdm/wdm

2003-09-02 Thread Malte Cornils
Hello, when choosing a window manager like twm with kdm or wdm (maybe also others, but not xdm), this window manager is executed without taking into account the user .xsession. The user .xsession is only taken into account when using the default "window manager". By the way, some of the mor

.xsession and kdm/wdm

2003-09-02 Thread Malte Cornils
Hello, when choosing a window manager like twm with kdm or wdm (maybe also others, but not xdm), this window manager is executed without taking into account the user .xsession. The user .xsession is only taken into account when using the default "window manager". By the way, some of the mor

Re: .xsession and kdm/wdm

2003-10-04 Thread Malte Cornils
Hi, Am Freitag, 05. September 2003 10:39 schrieb Branden Robinson: > On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 11:17:25PM +0200, Malte Cornils wrote: > > when choosing a window manager like twm with kdm or wdm (maybe also > > others, but not xdm), this window manager is executed without taking into

Re: .xsession and kdm/wdm

2003-10-04 Thread Malte Cornils
Hi, Am Freitag, 05. September 2003 10:39 schrieb Branden Robinson: > On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 11:17:25PM +0200, Malte Cornils wrote: > > when choosing a window manager like twm with kdm or wdm (maybe also > > others, but not xdm), this window manager is executed without taking into

Mach64 and the RENDER extension

2001-02-27 Thread Malte Cornils
Hi, As stated on this and Xfree's Xpert mailing list, X4.0.2 doesn't have RENDER support for Mach64 (=the non-Radeon non-r128 part of the ati driver); it got added with patch no. 7[1] right after the release. There's another patch, #68 that disables the RENDER extension if shadowfb is used; what I

Re: Mach64 and the RENDER extension

2001-03-01 Thread Malte Cornils
Hi! Regarding my inquiry from a few days ago, the problem went away, since a Xfree86.org CVS tree checked out recently gave me the Render extension, so it's kinda obvious that Debian unstable Xfree86 packages aren't synced with the latest CVS, which is what I thougt anyway. Thanks, Yours Malte #

Xprint problem in latest Xfree4.1.0-6pre7v3

2001-09-30 Thread Malte Cornils
Hello, I'm having a weird problem with the non-free StarOffice (5.2) application which I assume is related to the new Xfree (or more specifically, the xprt) package. StarOffice now doesn't start anymore, while a few days before it worked fine. I've done an strace -f and it goes into an infinite lo

Re: Xprint problem in latest Xfree4.1.0-6pre7v3

2001-09-30 Thread Malte Cornils
Malte Cornils wrote: > I'm trying to > downgrade to sid Xfree now [...] Hmm, since downgrading to Xfree86 4.1.0-6 did not alleviate the problem, I suppose I should turn elsewhere (namely to Sun) for support wrt this problem since the X prerelease is innocent. Sigh. (still, if anyone ca

Re: Xprint problem in latest Xfree4.1.0-6pre7v3

2001-09-30 Thread Malte Cornils
Branden Robinson wrote: > XPRINT expertise is very hard to come by. Few people in the XFree86 > Project have worked with it, and I think fewer still in Debian have. > > I suggest talking to about it. I'll take it up with them, thanks Branden! Yours Malte #8-)

Re: couple issues

2002-05-09 Thread Malte Cornils
Branden Robinson wrote: On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 08:36:51PM +0300, Jaakko Niemi wrote: Is there a way to get twm or fvwm start without -transcoded? Yes; I do it all the time. hmm, I had the same problem - with [EMAIL PROTECTED] set in /etc/environment at least. Installing the -transcoded p

Re: couple issues

2002-05-10 Thread Malte Cornils
Branden Robinson wrote: >>hmm, I had the same problem - with [EMAIL PROTECTED] set in >>/etc/environment at least. Installing the -transcoded packages >>fixed this. (of course, the transcoded fonts *are* useful in this >>case) > Yes, the -transcoded packages are important for people using > char

Re: [desktop] Unix configuration nightmare

2002-10-24 Thread Malte Cornils
Hi, On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 12:19:20PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > 2. It might be interesting to develop either colorized vim or emacs > > modes that were invoked when editing only-partially-editable files, such > > that the "hands-off" part appeared, say, in some distinct color. > > A ni

Mach64 and the RENDER extension

2001-02-27 Thread Malte Cornils
Hi, As stated on this and Xfree's Xpert mailing list, X4.0.2 doesn't have RENDER support for Mach64 (=the non-Radeon non-r128 part of the ati driver); it got added with patch no. 7[1] right after the release. There's another patch, #68 that disables the RENDER extension if shadowfb is used; what

Re: Mach64 and the RENDER extension

2001-03-01 Thread Malte Cornils
Hi! Regarding my inquiry from a few days ago, the problem went away, since a Xfree86.org CVS tree checked out recently gave me the Render extension, so it's kinda obvious that Debian unstable Xfree86 packages aren't synced with the latest CVS, which is what I thougt anyway. Thanks, Yours Malte

Xprint problem in latest Xfree4.1.0-6pre7v3

2001-09-30 Thread Malte Cornils
Hello, I'm having a weird problem with the non-free StarOffice (5.2) application which I assume is related to the new Xfree (or more specifically, the xprt) package. StarOffice now doesn't start anymore, while a few days before it worked fine. I've done an strace -f and it goes into an infinite l

Re: Xprint problem in latest Xfree4.1.0-6pre7v3

2001-09-30 Thread Malte Cornils
Malte Cornils wrote: > I'm trying to > downgrade to sid Xfree now [...] Hmm, since downgrading to Xfree86 4.1.0-6 did not alleviate the problem, I suppose I should turn elsewhere (namely to Sun) for support wrt this problem since the X prerelease is innocent. Sigh. (still, if anyo

Re: Xprint problem in latest Xfree4.1.0-6pre7v3

2001-09-30 Thread Malte Cornils
Branden Robinson wrote: > XPRINT expertise is very hard to come by. Few people in the XFree86 > Project have worked with it, and I think fewer still in Debian have. > > I suggest talking to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> about it. I'll take it up with them, thanks Branden! Yours Malte #8-) -- To UNSUB

Re: couple issues

2002-05-09 Thread Malte Cornils
Branden Robinson wrote: > On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 08:36:51PM +0300, Jaakko Niemi wrote: > >> Is there a way to get twm or fvwm start without -transcoded? > > > Yes; I do it all the time. hmm, I had the same problem - with LANG=de_DE@euro set in /etc/environment at least. Installing the -tran

Re: couple issues

2002-05-10 Thread Malte Cornils
Branden Robinson wrote: >>hmm, I had the same problem - with LANG=de_DE@euro set in >>/etc/environment at least. Installing the -transcoded packages >>fixed this. (of course, the transcoded fonts *are* useful in this >>case) > Yes, the -transcoded packages are important for people using >