Package: libgl1-mesa-dri
Version: 18.1.1-1
Followup-For: Bug #901497
Dear Maintainer,
I've also encountered hard video/mouse hangs after upgrade of mesa to 18.1.1-1.
It seems 100% reproducible with Firefox (Debian package 60.0.2-1), for example
on https://racetime.io/.
Disabling hardware accele
orking and buggy commit - only those few, that
binary search of git bisect stumbled upon.
If necessary, I can try building revisions between
a6561f2ec673b38907f7181235386f32e60c32ba and
da021c36bbdf3bca31ee50ebe01cdb9495c09b36 on next possible occasion.
--
Jacek Politowski
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 08:25:08AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 02:09 +0200, Jacek Politowski wrote:
>> Going upwards, from working to buggy revision, I treated FTBFS
>> (failing to build from source) commits as "bad" for git bisect. Going
>>
uild).
Being able to fix this build problem, I'd be able to do further git
bisect on driver repository.
--
Jacek Politowski
Script started on śro, 13 maj 2009, 12:49:12
j...@unstable-builder:~/workspace/radeon/upstream/gitrepo/xf86-video-ati$ make
make all-recursive
make[1]: Wejście do k
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 09:47:26AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 13:13 +0200, Jacek Politowski wrote:
>> I started git bisect between revisions
>> a6561f2ec673b38907f7181235386f32e60c32ba and
>> da021c36bbdf3bca31ee50ebe01cdb9495c09b36
>> (...
it?
I'm writing this under Gnome, on system that has
"""
(II) Module radeon: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
compiled for 1.6.1, module version = 6.12.2
"""
in Xorg.0.log :-)
Your patch applied against current master seems to have fixed the
issue.
Thanks
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 08:48:10AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 00:07 +0200, Jacek Politowski wrote:
>> Package: xserver-xorg-video-radeon
>> Version: 1:6.12.2-1
>> Severity: normal
>> After recent upgrade (I believe) display got totally corrup
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 12:12:26PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
>On 4/16/09, Jacek Politowski wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 08:48:10AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> >On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 00:07 +0200, Jacek Politowski wrote:
>>
>> >> Package: xserver
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 01:06:19PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On 4/16/09, Alex Deucher wrote:
>>>> On 4/16/09, Jacek Politowski wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 00:07 +0200, Jacek Politowski wrote:
>>>>>>> Package: xserver-xorg-vid
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 10:45:16PM +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
>Jacek Politowski wrote:
>> Where to find 6.1{0,1}.0? I can't find it neither on
>> snapshot.debian.net nor on regular mirror (ftp.pl.debian.org).
>I only have packages for 6.10.99.0 and 6.11.0 for i386.
>I
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 11:40:37AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 02:56 +0200, Jacek Politowski wrote:
>> Neither 6.11.0, built from your sources, nor 6.9.0 built from official
>> Debian's repo solves my problem.
>>
>> So, either I'm
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 12:34:06PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 12:13 +0200, Jacek Politowski wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 11:40:37AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>What else changed between the working and broken setups?
>xserver-xorg-core presumably, but
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 04:19:19PM +0200, Jacek Politowski wrote:
> As snapshot.debian.net seems inactive, only possible solution seems to
> be to downgrade all X stuff to testing distribution state.
> And it seems my last working setup was similar (or even exact) to
> what's le
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 12:46:47PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 08:55 +0200, Jacek Politowski wrote:
>> I'll try to upgrade again to current unstable version and try packages
>> I've built earlier (6.9.0, 6.11.0) - this time remembering always to
>
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 09:55:46PM +0200, Jacek Politowski wrote:
>On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 12:46:47PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>>On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 08:55 +0200, Jacek Politowski wrote:
>>> I'll try to upgrade again to current unstable version and try packages
>&g
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:09:41AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
>2009/4/19 Jacek Politowski :
>> Basically only version 6.9.0 works (both - in X from testing and from
>> unstable). Unfortunately I don't have access to source package of 6.10
>> version of radeon dri
16 matches
Mail list logo
