Package: xlibs
Version: 4.2.1-4
Severity: normal
Tags: sid
Between xfree 4.1 and 4.2 these symbols were added to libXrender (at
least):
XRenderCompositeText8
XRenderCompositeText16
XRenderCompositeText32
but the shlibs file still lists the dependency on 4.1.0. It should be:
libXrender 1 xlibs
Package: xlibs
Version: 4.2.1-4
Severity: normal
Tags: sid
Between xfree 4.1 and 4.2 these symbols were added to libXrender (at
least):
XRenderCompositeText8
XRenderCompositeText16
XRenderCompositeText32
but the shlibs file still lists the dependency on 4.1.0. It should be:
libXrender 1 xlibs
n xlibs-pic for the next version?
Oh a related note, why aren't all the static libs compiled with pic
versions? Is libXau not to be used, or replaced by something else?
--
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1
* Branden Robinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 10:20:44PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > I've packaged XCB <http://xcb.wiki.cs.pdx.edu/>, but I was in
> > violation of policy because the shared libraries were not compiled
> > with -fPIC. I
n xlibs-pic for the next version?
Oh a related note, why aren't all the static libs compiled with pic
versions? Is libXau not to be used, or replaced by something else?
--
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1
* Branden Robinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 10:20:44PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > I've packaged XCB <http://xcb.wiki.cs.pdx.edu/>, but I was in
> > violation of policy because the shared libraries were not compiled
> > with -fPIC. I
forwarded 432435 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11606
thanks
I filed this upstream before noticing the Debian bugs about
it. Apparently he has fixes in the upstream git.
--
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1024D/16D970C6 097C 486
nd drivers? If not, I will close this bug in the next
> weeks.
Haven't seen it in forever, feel free to close.
--
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
I'm seeing this too. The interesting part might be the line:
(WW) RADEON(0): Failed to detect secondary monitor, MergedFB/Clone
mode disabled
Not sure if that's the problem though. It may also have been reported
upstream as https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5178.
--
Er
I was able to workaround this problem by switching from Xinerama to
MergedFB. See randeon(4x) for details. This actually seems to be
superior to Xinerama. I had to disable DRI for stability
though. Attached is my xorg.conf as a reference.
--
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ: #61
reopen 344110
merge 344110 347167
thanks
I see this too with a Radeon 9500 using the radeon driver. Don't have
a good way of reproducing it. May be related to load.
--
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C
severity 350458 serious
thanks
I'm raising the severity since it's causing Firefox (at least) to
FTBFS. And as the submitter points out, it's not clear how this should
be resolved.
--
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1024D/16D970C
see below.
On Wed, 20 Sep 2000, Brian Paul wrote:
>
>
> Branden Robinson wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 18, 2000 at 09:54:03AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> > > > However, a consensus has formed of late among the XFree86 developers, in
> > > > conjunction with Brian Paul (the mastermind of the Mes
see below.
On Wed, 20 Sep 2000, Brian Paul wrote:
>
>
> Branden Robinson wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 18, 2000 at 09:54:03AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> > > > However, a consensus has formed of late among the XFree86 developers, in
> > > > conjunction with Brian Paul (the mastermind of the Me
14 matches
Mail list logo
