On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 09:27:01AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
wrote:
> +* Provide ability for X.Org to generate config file each time on boot for
> + LiveCD use (suggested by Petter Reinholdtsen. David has the example script
> he
> + sent that provides this.)
... what? I don't
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 03:39:34PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Of the library packages, only xlibmesa-glu depends on libstdc++. In fact,
> it's the only C++ package in the entire xorg tree.
> xlibmesa-glu
> -- This will need a new package name. It has a really weird package
>name right n
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 12:02:10PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> Speaking of which, there are some very strange conversations on debian-x
> right now concerning some mysterious packages produced in x11-xorg which
> operate under the nomikers of xprt and xprt-common. This conversation
> has left me r
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 11:48:27AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Wednesday 06 July 2005 23:41, Mark Hurenkamp wrote:
> > I'm running kubuntu linux, which uses xorg-6.8.2-10 package, and I
> > noticed that the 055_lnx_evdev_keyboard.diff was included, and so I
> > wanted to give it a try.
>
> Please
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 06:47:21PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> Upon purge, xfree86-common leaves two files (or directories) in /tmp,
> which it should remove for cleanliness. This is not, however, a bug that
> actually affects anything much. This bug report is just a reminder that
> we agreed at
On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 02:53:01PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> su, 2005-07-10 kello 03:12 +1000, Daniel Stone kirjoitti:
> > If the two are /tmp/.X11-unix and /tmp/.ICE-unix, I don't think we
> > should bother removing them. They're required for any X work, and /tmp
&
On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 06:59:56PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> xfonts-base lost an encoding:
> /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/encodings/large/jisx0208.1983-0.enc.gz
> xlibs lost:
> /etc/X11/xkb/geometry/omnibook
> /etc/X11/xkb/symbols/ru_yawerty
>
> I don't know what to make of those changes; they'
I just committed the fix for #725 to X.Org HEAD. Apparently this
doesn't constitute 'fixed-upstream', so I'm going to leave manipulation
of the bug tags to someone who knwos this better than me.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMA
On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 02:51:21PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Daniel Stone wrote:
> >Er, you don't get to choose. The DDX driver nominates which DRI module
> >to load, and libGL loads it. The only chance of confusion is people
> >upgrading xserver-xorg but not x
Hi,
I've got a patch up on http://people.debian.org/~daniels/ that fixes
three issues with 6.8.2.dfsg.1-1:
* vars.s390 has _XFREE86_ instead of _XORG_, causing FTBFS of
sorts when it attempts to build the debug server -- it trips
some nasty breakage in ...
* libX
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 02:56:01PM +0200, Jan De Luyck wrote:
> This package provides the libglu1 library built from the X.Org sources,
> yet it does not specify as such. This causes installation problems:
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> kcontrol: Depends: xlibmesa-glu but
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 10:24:15AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
wrote:
> Log:
> - Add libglu1 to Provides for libglu1-xorg
Eep! Please don't do this! It's libglu1c2 for a reason!
C++ transition and all that.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 05:36:19PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 07:17:54AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 10:24:15AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository
> > Admin wrote:
> > > Log:
> > > - Add libglu1 to Provi
http://people.debian.org/~daniels/ as usual, (presumably) making s390
happy:
xorg-x11 (6.8.2.dfsg.1-3) unstable; urgency=low
* Changes by Daniel Stone:
- Fix S/390 build by bringing MANIFEST and *.install.s390 files up to
date.
- Let Xdmx build on S/390 as well. Move
Hi,
I just put a new set of packages up in the usual place, which are now
97% more MIPS-compatible.
Updated MANIFEST.mips{,el}.in.
Updated xserver-xorg.install for mips{,el} and also alpha.
Updated MANIFEST.sparc.in because it was broken for some bizzare reason
(looks like the omnibook/ru_yawerty/
For the record, I am neither Debian's xorg maintainer, nor a woman.
Cheers,
Daniel(le?)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 01:09:20AM -0400, Keenan Pepper wrote:
> The current I810 driver /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/i810_drv.o is
> quite unstable and crashes a lot, especially when playing video. Alan
> Hourihane's driver at http://www.fairlite.demon.co.uk/intel.html is much
> better and th
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 02:02:35AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> XSF, can we switch to using dlloader on alpha? Pleese? :)
It does not make sense to do this for one architecture only.
I'd suggest that until we move to dlloader wholesale, alpha joins hppa,
mips*, m68k, sh*, etc in using a st
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 01:57:47PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 02:00:07AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 02:02:35AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > XSF, can we switch to using dlloader on alpha? Pleese? :)
> >
>
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 03:17:02PM -0400, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> X.org HEAD was switched to build dlloader by default a while ago, so
> it'll be like that in 6.9/7.0. That said, I don't know if or how well
> dlloader works on all the architectures, but I'd expect it to be more
> portable than elflo
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 08:00:47PM +0200, David Martínez Moreno wrote:
> El Martes, 19 de Julio de 2005 14:20, David Nusinow escribió:
> > Because the first priority is to get the thing to build on all arches.
> > These stupid MANIFEST changes are something you only really have to do
> > once, but
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 12:49:09AM -0400, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 11:52 +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 03:17:02PM -0400, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > X.org HEAD was switched to build dlloader by default a while ago, so
> > > it
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 06:25:36PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> The attached patch, which comes from upstream by way of Jay Estabrook
> at HP, adds the necessary handling for the additional relocation type on
> Alpha, fixing the latest segfault. As per the name, it should slip
> right into the p
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 12:00:18PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 11:25:30AM +0800, Eugene Konev wrote:
> > > +xorg-x11 (6.8.2.dfsg.1-5+SVN) unstable; urgency=low
> > ^^
> >
> > 5+SVN > 5. That should be 4+SVN, probably.
>
> Nope, sadly -4 is in
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 03:19:07PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> If you want to start grepping through the whole archive and finding all the
> packages that build-dep on xlibs-dev, and then start sending patches to
> every one, feel free. I'm not prepared to even think about doing that
> myself unt
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 08:16:02AM +0200, David Martínez Moreno wrote:
> El Viernes, 22 de Julio de 2005 02:01, Daniel Stone escribió:
> > Bear in mind that one of the things that will bite us in the arse is
> > people who use the AC_PATH_XTRA autoconf macro to look for X, which
&
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 12:42:29AM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Current RADEON driver in X.Org 6.8.2 doesn't support Non-Rectangular MergedFB
> Desktops, or AGPMode 8x, not to mention r300 drivers from DRI CVS. X.Org CVS
> Snapshots, like 6.8.99.15 does. Maybe RADEON driver should be backported
atch - if this does not work for you, please outline the specific
reasons why, including configuration files, logs, lspci, et al.
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian: the universal operating system http://www.debian.or
g Debian Sarge on an AMD XP 1800+
If 'ati' doesn't work, then 'radeon' has no business working. Please use
reportbug xserver-xfree86, which will send information such as the
output of lspci, /var/log/XFree86.0.log (preferably from both working
and non-
ltiple xservers in
> > the archive.
>
> It does not, and it may be quite some time before it does.
It will not; the 'independent' in DIX is a misnomer designed to convince
naive idiots new to X that you can put the Xorg DDX on top of the KDrive
DIX and have stuff just work. Fools.
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian: the universal operating system http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ive X
> > servers and let people use them on smaller systems.
>
> kdrive has already been ITPed[2] by Daniel Stone, so I presume it's his
> Intention to Package it.
I intend to follow through on both my xlibs and xserver ITPs, yes. They
aren't bitrotting.
> > &
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 01:57:33AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 10:42:10AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > 2) Most of the X.Org/freedesktop.org folks aren't as psychotically
> >meticulous about license issues as I am;
>
> ... which isn&#
u still wanted to retain the MANIFEST stuff, you could have
debian/tmp.arch, and debian/tmp.indep, and a MANIFEST.indep.
Am I missing something?
:) d
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian: the universal operating system http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 12:11:29PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 01:42:43AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Fonts and docs are a clear decision: the monolithic tree is the only
> > provider of these. Despite best intentions (and efforts), most apps are
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 12:15:51PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 01:42:43AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > I am willing to expend significant work on this; indeed, I'm in the
> > middle of my rejuvinated xlibs work, and am prepared to put in the wor
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 05:53:02PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 04:06:23AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 07:21:57PM +0200, Kevin Boergens wrote:
> > > http://netghost.narod.ru/gff/graphics/summary/xbm.htm
> > >
>
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 02:51:47PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 01:57:33AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 10:42:10AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > Let me mitigate that complaint by observing:
> > > 1) Maybe no
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 03:03:24PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 02:16:04AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > AIUI, these commits are all cleared by an author-internal filter as to
> > licence cleanliness.
>
> I don't understand this. What&#x
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 03:08:56PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 03:25:36AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Regardless of who packages it - hell, Ali Akaagac could package it if it
> > was of good enough quality - the question is who should maintain it
e changed, and he plans to start again.
I stated my view of the XSF as it was while I was still a member[0];
I've not had any experience of the mechanics of this group since I wrote
that mail, but my core view has not changed much at all.
-d
[0]: Lacking a better name for 'the group of peop
ely removed
from the DUX, and thus from X maintainence. That's why I can't
contribute.
[0]: Well, @gFH excluded. It's world-write in the same way debian-x is.
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian: the universal operating system http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: xrender
Severity: important
Hi,
xrender currently abuses pkgconfig; by installing its includes to
/usr/X11R6, but telling configure they're in /usr, xrender.pc will
contain an includedir of /usr/include, and according CFLAGS[0]. This is
wrong, as /usr/X11R6/include is actually needed, ins
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 10:22:42PM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > So call the group of people who can upload X something else.
> >
> > The XSF to me is meaningless as a concept
>
> If it is meaningless to you, it does
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 11:54:36PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-07-02 at 06:37 +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 10:22:42PM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
> > wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > > If I de
On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 12:46:44PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'm more than happy with the job Fabio does as RM - I have absolutely no
> > issue here. My issue is with the fact he refuses to acknowledge that
> > some peo
On Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 07:36:42PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 01:44:28AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > So call the group of people who can upload X something else.
>
> ...same thing they're called for all other group-maintained packages. Fo
ery uncomfortable with
that principle.
And, if you refuse to speak to me outside of the context of debian-x,
how can I realistically avoid being so hideously wrong again?
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian: the universal operating
On Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 07:43:26PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 01:35:30PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Yes, I indicated my extreme discomfort with the current XSF order. The
> > current XSF order, however, is not necessarily something which need be
&
h as possible between the lines[0], would
you like to share exactly what you think about a maintainership group
for xlibs that includes myself?
[0]: Which tends to be a great ploy to later jump out from behind some
bushes and say 'WRONG! SUCK! I didn't say that!'.
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian: the universal operating system http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 01:20:49PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> If Mr. Stone feels there are exigent circumstances at work here, he should
> say so.
By the way, I'll make a special exception. You can call me Daniel.
--
Daniel Stone
e package
>release
>
> [...]
>
> [1] ...that I've been able to determine from his public comments on the
> subject.
No other XSF member, past, present, future, or potential, was involved
in my decision.
--
Daniel Stone
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 04:33:16AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 07:51:32PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 07:40:32PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > While it is true that only a fraction of these people actively use their
&
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 04:47:21AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 11:48:24AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 01:20:49PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > The above *does* apply even if a given upstream package changes its
>
the code?
It used to be #ifdef REDHAT_CUSTOM or something, but I changed it when I
stole it.
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian: the universal operating system http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
this a shot:
XFree86 :0 -nolisten tcp -dpi 100 & sleep 2 && DISPLAY=:0.0
whatever-you-usually-run
(Replace 'whatever-you-usually-run' with gnome-session, startkde, or
whatever.)
Hopefully you can find some information this way on why your environment
nd add Suggest: xspecs to the control.
This should ideally just be on a website somewhere or something. fd.o
and X.Org have lots of bandwidth.
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian: the universal operating system http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 08:32:01PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> On Thu 22 Jul 2004 04:17:38 +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > This should ideally just be on a website somewhere or something. fd.o
> > and X.Org have lots of bandwidth.
>
> I don't.
So how are you get
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 08:57:33PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Le jeu 22 jui 2004 ? 04:48:15 +1000, Daniel Stone a tapot? sur son clavier :
> > On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 08:32:01PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > On Thu 22 Jul 2004 04:17:38 +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
&
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 09:19:35PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Le jeu 22 jui 2004 ? 05:10:55 +1000, Daniel Stone a tapot? sur son clavier :
> > On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 08:57:33PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Le jeu 22 jui 2004 ? 04:48:15 +1000, Daniel Ston
On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 04:44:18AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Is there a command to check for syntax errors in /etc/X11/XF86Config-4
> short of restarting X?
No.
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian: the universal oper
On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 03:14:46AM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-07-27 at 10:29 +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 04:44:18AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> > > Is there a command to check for syntax errors in /etc/X11/XF86Config-4
> >
You know, like when we power up, when there is a XF86Config-4 syntax
> error, the X Server will refuse to start. That's as far as I want to go.
Try -probeonly or something.
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian: the universa
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 09:16:55AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> D> Try -probeonly or something.
>
> This frobs ones eproms all the same.
Yes.
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian: the universal operating system
his notice, the name of the copyright holder(s)
* and author(s) shall not be used in advertising or otherwise to promote
* the sale, use or other dealings in this Software without prior written
* authorization from the copyright holder(s) and author(s).
*
* Author: David Dawes <[EMAIL P
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 05:50:08PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > However, on the release call today, it was alleged that the code was
> > actually DFSG-free, and that the so-called 'X-Oz licence' bore no legal
> > p
t; that here ?
There is no COPYRIGHT file; this is from
programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/getconfig, and
programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/common/xf86AutoConfig.c, from the X.Org CVS
tree (the monolithic one).
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Deb
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 02:01:03AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi guys,
> We're trying to release X11R6.7.1 over at X.Org these days, but we've
> hit a little roadbump.
>
> As I'm sure you all know, XFree86 post-4.4RC2 bears a non-DFSG-free
> licence, which
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 12:11:39AM -0400, John D. Hendrickson wrote:
> I do not appreciate being called completely bogues.
I said the bug was completely bogus, not you.
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian: the universal operati
on't actually give any
details about supposed bugs that may or may not exist, and made false
accusations.
> Am I good? Or does Redhat suck? Ha ha
I know what conclusions I drew.
> gtk/libgtk-x11-2.0.la:dependency_libs='
> /mnt
ectly legal, and just sedded to 'ati' in the
XFree86 scripts if they really want to enforce this whole 'only ever use
the wrapper' thingo.
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian: the universal operating system http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
86 :1 -ac -logverbose , and send a copy of
/var/log/XFree86.1.log?
:) d
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian: the universal operating system http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
/xorg, 'X.Org CVS'; /cvs/xserver/xserver, 'KDrive CVS'; debrix's TLA
archive, 'debrix TLA'.
Thanks,
Daniel
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian: the universal operating system htt
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 02:32:49PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Yes, "somehow". You don't provide any code, or anything beyond the barest
> sketch of a design really, so this is going to have to wait until after
> sarge.
http://www.google.com/search?q=ddcprobe+
edid only seems to
> hurt x86 users with buggy hardware.
If you have an i855 or such, try running 'X :1 -probeonly -ac' some day,
when you have an X session already running.
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian: the uni
quot;reportbug" a try as your primary
> bug reporting tool for the Debian System, and try filing your report
> again.
Won't following this advice cause the reporter to get another form letter
telling them off for filing duplicate bugs?
--
Daniel Stone
>
> - echo "$(date +%F %X%z) ${*:-(empty message)}" >>"$CONFIG_LOG"
> + echo "$(date +"%F %X%z") ${*:-(empty message)}" >>"$CONFIG_LOG"
>observe "$*"
> }
s/")/)"/
--
Daniel Stone
Hi Branden,
HACKING.txt currently has outdated information wrt the xf86AutoConfig
code; could you please fix this up?
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian: the universal operating system http://www.debi
the very right
> side are displayed on the very left.
>
> Replacing nv_drv.o with a self-compiled version from current X.org CVS
> fixes the issue.
Try 'Option "FlatPanel"'.
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Deb
e, but t1-cyrillic now FTBFSes because fontforge
no longer provides pfaedit.
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian: the universal operating system http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
g many things which we've long taken for
granted.
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian: the universal operating system http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 06:50:50PM +0200, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 September 2004 6:56, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > I was looking at this one, but t1-cyrillic now FTBFSes because fontforge
> > no longer provides pfaedit.
>
> fontforge is just the new name of pfaedit,
On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 12:51:30PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 08:13:23PM -0700, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 02:32:49PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > My only concern about that approach is we'd better be damn sure s
gt; Can either of you guys shed some light on who wrote this code?
warp did, IIRC.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"The programs are documented fully by _The Rise and Fall of a Fooish Bar_,
available by the Info system." -- deb
igher than 'important', unless the
driver somehow has a security hole, or causes file loss.
:) d
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian: the universal operating system http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
hout rendering it completely unusable to everyone.
>
> Clearly it is not "unusable to everyone" otherwise it would have been
> reported a week ago.
>
> I am not downgrading it, as I am no part of the xfree86
> maintainer-team.
Neither am I, but don't
g
the same IRQ. I think I had to take ACPI down to 1.1 and boot with
pci=noacpi noapic. With that dodgy hack done, it all works now (I have
an Abit KD7, with a KT400 chipset).
Does that fix things for you?
:) d
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
replace it with freedesktop.org's modular
xlibs/xserver/xapps trees, to make it far easier to maintain.
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian: the universal operating system http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ce.
> Please, correct me if I'm wrong. But don't spend too much time on point
> '8' , I know I'm right about this one.
OK, I won't bother arguing. Saves me time anyway.
And the disk-space issue is fixed.
--
Daniel Stone
ageing.
Kamion said the only thing holding it up yesterday was an RC bug, which
I promptly downgraded; if it didn't go in today, I expect that will be
because of the new sppc upload, making it a transitive problem.
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian: the universal operating system http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 02:18:03PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 11:42:30PM -0800, Daniel Stone wrote:
> >...
> > Kamion said the only thing holding it up yesterday was an RC bug, which
> > I promptly downgraded; if it didn't go in today, I expect t
he same collection of code merged in
> (or whether they intend to). (I hope so.) Any idea?
The actual codebases don't diverge too much, except we have more radical
plans, such as using libdl for our loader (while retaining XFree86-ELF
capability).
--
Daniel Stone
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 05:06:21PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 06:39:47AM -0800, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 02:18:03PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 11:42:30PM -0800, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > >..
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 03:20:59PM +0200, Ond?ej Sur? wrote:
> could you update your XSF page to include members of XSF?
> (The question really is if Daniel Stone and you calmed down and are you
> cooperating again :-)
I'm very calm. I'll take anyone who cares out for a beer t
session-manager for full environments? x-w-m
should just manage windows, IMO, where as x-s-m should be for full
environments (KDE vs KWin, GNOME vs Metacity, XFce vs XFwm, et al).
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian: the universal oper
t have to make a judgement call at the time: are you writing a
whole new, complicated, extension, or are you changing an instance of
strcpy to strncpy?
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian: the universal operating system http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 04:29:32AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 08:46:06AM -0800, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 03:20:59PM +0200, Ond?ej Sur? wrote:
> > > could you update your XSF page to include members of XSF?
> > > (The q
On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 12:39:22AM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 13:48, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 04:29:32AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> >
> > > > freedesktop.org's xlibs/xserver/xapps will be uploaded after sarge, w
.
important, at best. I'm not suggesting that the patch shouldn't be
applied for 4.3.0-8, which, given Branden's lack of response, I assume I
am release-managing. However, it is most certainly not RC.
Please don't go around making stupid suggestions like this: you might
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 01:53:53AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 08:48:15PM -0800, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > important, at best. I'm not suggesting that the patch shouldn't be
> > applied for 4.3.0-8, which, given Branden's lack of respo
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 11:30:07AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > I didn't see that; all I saw was 'why is no-one asking to be RM :('.
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/2004/debian-x-200403/msg03703.html
Ahr.
301 - 400 of 1229 matches
Mail list logo
