Bug#414987: closed by Brice Goglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (ping timeout, closing)

2007-07-05 Thread Daniel Ruoso
Qua, 2007-07-04 às 23:15 +, Debian Bug Tracking System escreveu: > > Closing this bug since I didn't get any reply from the submitter (or > > repliers) after my ping about a month ago. If anybody ever reproduces > > this problem, feel free to reopen. > > Brice Unfortunally I got a new machine

Bug#419540: Broken with new version of libmetacity

2007-04-23 Thread Daniel Ruoso
Package: compiz-gtk Version: 0.2.2-1 Followup-For: Bug #419540 compiz-gtk fails to build with the newer version of libmetacity. ./../../gtk/window-decorator/gtk-window-decorator.c: In function ‘meta_get_window_region’: ../../../gtk/window-decorator/gtk-window-decorator.c:1849: error: ‘MetaFrameGe

Bug#420419: Current version don't support dual-screen in dual-head

2007-04-23 Thread Daniel Ruoso
Hi, I've recently updated to the new version, I had the old config for dual-head, and it was breaking the X server. I've followed what is in this bug report and it worked as expected except for some things... 1) I couldn't make the X server work with two different screens (I mean :0.0 and :0.1),

Bug#420419: Current version don't support dual-screen in dual-head

2007-04-26 Thread Daniel Ruoso
Seg, 2007-04-23 às 21:45 +0200, Brice Goglin escreveu: > Daniel Ruoso wrote: > > 1) I couldn't make the X server work with two different screens (I > > mean :0.0 and :0.1), I only get a xinerama-like support, which is not > > what I want (I like to have 2 x more desktop

Bug#407055: Compiz breaks the X server if the other head doesn't have DRI

2007-03-01 Thread Daniel Ruoso
Hi, I have a similar setup and a similar need, but differently from the described scenario, compiz breaks my X server when I try to start it. I think the difference from my case to the other case reported here is that I don't have any support for DRI in the other head, instead of having a bad DRI

Bug#407055: Compiz breaks the X server if the other head doesn't have DRI

2007-03-01 Thread Daniel Ruoso
Qui, 2007-03-01 às 12:46 +0100, Brice Goglin escreveu: > On 3/1/07, Daniel Ruoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I'm attaching the log from the server just before the break, I think > >this can help. As this bug not only makes compiz unusable, but also > >affects a

Bug#407055: Compiz breaks the X server if the other head doesn't have DRI

2007-03-01 Thread Daniel Ruoso
Qui, 2007-03-01 às 11:55 +, Daniel Ruoso escreveu: > Qui, 2007-03-01 às 12:46 +0100, Brice Goglin escreveu: > > On 3/1/07, Daniel Ruoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >I'm attaching the log from the server just before the break, I think > > >this can h

Bug#407055: Compiz breaks the X server if the other head doesn't have DRI

2007-03-01 Thread Daniel Ruoso
Qui, 2007-03-01 às 14:21 +0100, Brice Goglin escreveu: > Daniel Ruoso wrote: > > Well, the version in experimental also breaks, but it presents a > > different backtrace... > Do you onyl have compiz in experimental? Or also some other X packages? > Which xserver-xorg-