Can I just yank GLU out of Mesa ?

2000-08-21 Thread Alexander Perry
Much to my amazement, the XF401 phase 1 installed nicely (after using the --force-depends) on a new potato machine. Unfortunately, I haven't managed to take advantage of the DRI because most of the Mesa demos (and plib1) rely on having GLU available. Is there anything 'different' about the xlibgl

Prepackaged indirected X terminal

2000-11-24 Thread Alexander Perry
I know how to have xdm use the indirect and chooser features to work with external X terminals and determine where they go. Works great, but it leaves me with a simple question ... Is there a clean way to specify that the locally managed display should be indirected (like a terminal would be) for

Re: Prepackaged indirected X terminal

2000-11-26 Thread Alexander Perry
From: Karl Hammar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > $ man Xserver | sed -n -e '288,340p' Yes, I know. From: Alexander Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > [...] > I can do it by disabling it in xdm and putting a line in the > inittab, but the authentication stuff is a pain and I&#

Re: Prepackaged indirected X terminal

2000-11-28 Thread Alexander Perry
Thanks, Karl, that is much neater than the way I was doing it. What I'm trying to set up is this ... The nameservers are all running xdm to catch broadcast xdmcp requests. These are given the chooser with a list of host names that is automatically derived from the nameserver content. Each calling

Can I just yank GLU out of Mesa ?

2000-08-21 Thread Alexander Perry
Much to my amazement, the XF401 phase 1 installed nicely (after using the --force-depends) on a new potato machine. Unfortunately, I haven't managed to take advantage of the DRI because most of the Mesa demos (and plib1) rely on having GLU available. Is there anything 'different' about the xlibg

Prepackaged indirected X terminal

2000-11-24 Thread Alexander Perry
I know how to have xdm use the indirect and chooser features to work with external X terminals and determine where they go. Works great, but it leaves me with a simple question ... Is there a clean way to specify that the locally managed display should be indirected (like a terminal would be) fo

Re: Prepackaged indirected X terminal

2000-11-25 Thread Alexander Perry
From: Karl Hammar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > $ man Xserver | sed -n -e '288,340p' Yes, I know. From: Alexander Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > [...] > I can do it by disabling it in xdm and putting a line in the > inittab, but the authentication stuff is a pain

Re: Prepackaged indirected X terminal

2000-11-27 Thread Alexander Perry
Thanks, Karl, that is much neater than the way I was doing it. What I'm trying to set up is this ... The nameservers are all running xdm to catch broadcast xdmcp requests. These are given the chooser with a list of host names that is automatically derived from the nameserver content. Each callin