Your message dated Fri, 23 Mar 2018 10:24:23 +0200
with message-id <8337fbe5-6920-78f7-66db-44e3d429d...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#876084: [libglvnd-dev] Can't upgrade libglvnd-dev
anymore
has caused the Debian Bug report #876084,
regarding [libglvnd-dev] Can't upgrade libglvnd-dev anym
Timo Aaltonen pushed new tag libglvnd-1.0.0+git20180308-1 at X Strike Force /
lib / libglvnd
---
View it on GitLab:
https://salsa.debian.org/xorg-team/lib/libglvnd/tree/libglvnd-1.0.0+git20180308-1
You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.
On 22.03.2018 08:26, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> On 22.03.2018 02:00, Chris Lamb wrote:
>>
>> (I am "merely" forwarding note below; please add waldi@ in any replies)
>>
>> -- Chris Lamb Wed, 21 Mar 2018 23:50:49 +
>
> Did you even bother to look at the *new* package? I addressed every
> issue me
Your message dated Fri, 23 Mar 2018 08:52:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#884717: fixed in libglvnd 1.0.0+git20180308-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #884717,
regarding libgl1: consider using a version that is higher than 1.2.0 for the
libGL.so.1.0.0 filename
to be marked as done
xorgproto_2018.4-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
xorgproto_2018.4-2.dsc
xorgproto_2018.4.orig.tar.gz
xorgproto_2018.4.orig.tar.gz.asc
xorgproto_2018.4-2.diff.gz
x11proto-bigreqs-dev_2018.4-2_all.deb
x11proto-composite-dev_2018.4-2_all.deb
x11pr
libglvnd_1.0.0+git20180308-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libglvnd_1.0.0+git20180308-1.dsc
libglvnd_1.0.0+git20180308.orig.tar.gz
libglvnd_1.0.0+git20180308-1.debian.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.o
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 10:15:50 +0200
Source: libglvnd
Binary: libglvnd-dev libglvnd-core-dev libglvnd0 libegl1 libgles2 libgl1
libglx0 libopengl0
Architecture: source
Version: 1.0.0+git20180308-1
Distribution: unstable
Urge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 10:15:50 +0200
Source: libglvnd
Binary: libglvnd-dev libglvnd-core-dev libglvnd0 libegl1 libgles2 libgl1
libglx0 libopengl0
Architecture: source
Version: 1.0.0+git20180308-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
M
binary:x11proto-dev is NEW.
binary:x11proto-dev is NEW.
source:xorgproto is NEW.
Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient.
Package: libxkbcommon-dev
Version: 0.8.0-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
The package libxkbcommon-dev is not multi-arch installable, as the PNG
files differ in timestamp between package variants.
Please split the documentation files from libxkbcommon-dev into a new
package, e.g. libxkbcommon
> > Did you even bother to look at the *new* package?
The dak interface does not make it immediately obvious that the
aforementioend notes were written about a superceded version, so
these things sometimes happen.
Thank you for your patience and re-uploading, I hope it didn't
cause too much dela
Your message dated Fri, 23 Mar 2018 12:00:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#890973: fixed in xorgproto 2018.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #890973,
regarding ITP: xorgproto -- X11 extension protocols and auxiliary headers
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2018 11:46:05 +0200
Source: xorgproto
Binary: x11proto-dev x11proto-bigreqs-dev x11proto-composite-dev
x11proto-core-dev x11proto-damage-dev x11proto-dmx-dev x11proto-dri2-dev
x11proto-dri3-dev x11proto-fi
On 23.03.2018 13:56, Chris Lamb wrote:
>
>>> Did you even bother to look at the *new* package?
>
> The dak interface does not make it immediately obvious that the
> aforementioend notes were written about a superceded version, so
> these things sometimes happen.
Ok, the rejection email did show
Processing control commands:
> tag 859461 + patch
Bug #859461 [xterm] xterm: seperate package for resize would be nice
Added tag(s) patch.
--
859461: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=859461
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag 859461 + patch
Hello,
On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 01:49:32PM -0600, ben hildred wrote:
> Which brings me to my request, split resize into a seprate package and depend
> on it to preserve existing functionality while allowing headless machines to
> install just resize.
I could make use of
Timo Aaltonen pushed new tag xorg-server-2_1.19.99.901-1 at X Strike Force /
xserver / xorg-server
---
View it on GitLab:
https://salsa.debian.org/xorg-team/xserver/xorg-server/tree/xorg-server-2_1.19.99.901-1
You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.
Timo Aaltonen pushed to branch debian-experimental at X Strike Force / xserver
/ xorg-server
Commits:
322cde94 by Timo Aaltonen at 2018-03-23T18:22:25+02:00
release to experimental
- - - - -
1 changed file:
- debian/changelog
Changes:
=
debian/changelog
xorg-server_1.19.99.901-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
xorg-server_1.19.99.901-1.dsc
xorg-server_1.19.99.901.orig.tar.gz
xorg-server_1.19.99.901-1.diff.gz
xorg-server_1.19.99.901-1_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (run
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 18:18:38 +0200
Source: xorg-server
Binary: xserver-xorg-core xserver-xorg-core-udeb xserver-xorg-dev xdmx
xdmx-tools xnest xvfb xserver-xephyr xserver-common xorg-server-source xwayland
xserver-xorg-legacy
Archite
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 18:18:38 +0200
Source: xorg-server
Binary: xserver-xorg-core xserver-xorg-core-udeb xserver-xorg-dev xdmx
xdmx-tools xnest xvfb xserver-xephyr xserver-common xorg-server-source xwayland
xserver-xorg-l
Source: xorgproto
Version: 2018.4-2
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap
Very many packages cannot be cross built anymore, because they have one
of those transitional dummy packages in their dependency closure. In
general, Architecture: all packages can ne
22 matches
Mail list logo
