libdrm: Changes to 'refs/tags/libdrm-2.4.59-1'

2015-01-21 Thread Maarten Bernardus Lankhorst
Tag 'libdrm-2.4.59-1' created by Maarten Lankhorst at 2015-01-21 12:28 + libdrm Debian release 2.4.59-1 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAABAgAGBQJUv5teAAoJEP5VjHKmcBPDAYsP/iw7CUkIqSmyGi1WobMs4U4h hMcRsj3lhDYJYjDEH2N1J/bJJqshh7JnimK/+mdGlHDjvePJ5kKgRfCuNhzWOBsS MtYTcw1jC

Processing of libdrm_2.4.59-1_amd64.changes

2015-01-21 Thread Debian FTP Masters
libdrm_2.4.59-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: libdrm_2.4.59-1.dsc libdrm_2.4.59.orig.tar.gz libdrm_2.4.59-1.diff.gz libdrm-dev_2.4.59-1_amd64.deb libdrm2_2.4.59-1_amd64.deb libdrm2-udeb_2.4.59-1_amd64.udeb libdrm2-dbg_2.4.59-1_amd64

Processing of libdrm_2.4.59-1_amd64.changes

2015-01-21 Thread Debian FTP Masters
libdrm_2.4.59-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libdrm_2.4.59-1.dsc libdrm_2.4.59.orig.tar.gz libdrm_2.4.59-1.diff.gz libdrm-dev_2.4.59-1_amd64.deb libdrm2_2.4.59-1_amd64.deb libdrm2-udeb_2.4.59-1_amd64.udeb libdrm2-dbg_2.4.59-1_amd64.deb libdr

libdrm_2.4.59-1_amd64.changes is NEW

2015-01-21 Thread Debian FTP Masters
binary:libdrm-tegra0 is NEW. binary:libdrm-tegra0-dbg is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient. Packages are rout

libdrm: Changes to 'refs/tags/libdrm-2.4.59-1'

2015-01-21 Thread Maarten Bernardus Lankhorst
Rebased ref, commits from common ancestor: -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1ydwou-0003ti...@moszumanska.debian.org

libdrm_2.4.59-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2015-01-21 Thread Debian FTP Masters
libdrm_2.4.59-1.dsc: Does not match file already existing in the pool. === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with

Processing of libdrm_2.4.59-1_amd64.changes

2015-01-21 Thread Debian FTP Masters
libdrm_2.4.59-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libdrm_2.4.59-1.dsc libdrm_2.4.59.orig.tar.gz libdrm_2.4.59-1.diff.gz libdrm-dev_2.4.59-1_amd64.deb libdrm2_2.4.59-1_amd64.deb libdrm2-udeb_2.4.59-1_amd64.udeb libdrm2-dbg_2.4.59-1_amd64.deb libdr

Bug#775952: xterm: VT100.backarrowKey default value vs man page documentation

2015-01-21 Thread Vincent Lefevre
Package: xterm Version: 312-1 Severity: normal Whether I run xterm -xrm "*VT100.backarrowKey: true" or xterm -xrm "*VT100.backarrowKey: false" the backarrow key gives the delete (127) character, while the xterm man page says: backarrowKey (class BackarrowKey) Specifies whether

Processed: Re: xterm: VT100.backarrowKey default value vs man page documentation

2015-01-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > retitle -1 xterm: VT100.backarrowKey initial value vs man page documentation Bug #775952 [xterm] xterm: VT100.backarrowKey default value vs man page documentation Changed Bug title to 'xterm: VT100.backarrowKey initial value vs man page documentation' from 'xterm:

Bug#775952: xterm: VT100.backarrowKey default value vs man page documentation

2015-01-21 Thread Vincent Lefevre
Control: retitle -1 xterm: VT100.backarrowKey initial value vs man page documentation On 2015-01-21 22:38:53 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > Whether I run > > xterm -xrm "*VT100.backarrowKey: true" > > or > > xterm -xrm "*VT100.backarrowKey: false" > > the backarrow key gives the delete (