Re: Bug#769072: gnome-shell: GNOME Shell crashing with "Oh no, something went wrong"

2014-11-15 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 23:42:37 +, Simon McVittie wrote: > I think the problem here is that something is not right in the > dependencies for the i965_dri.so and swrast_dri.so drivers, > so you don't have any OpenGL support (not even software rendering) > and GNOME Shell can't run: > > On Tue

Re: Bug#769072: gnome-shell: GNOME Shell crashing with "Oh no, something went wrong"

2014-11-15 Thread Janusz S. Bien
Quote/Cytat - Julien Cristau (sob, 15 lis 2014, 10:48:51): On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 23:42:37 +, Simon McVittie wrote: I think the problem here is that something is not right in the dependencies for the i965_dri.so and swrast_dri.so drivers, so you don't have any OpenGL support (not even

Processed: Re: Bug#769564: mpv: Segfault when playing in fullscreen

2014-11-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 libgl1-mesa-dri Bug #769564 [mpv] mpv: Segfault when playing in fullscreen Bug reassigned from package 'mpv' to 'libgl1-mesa-dri'. No longer marked as found in versions mpv/0.6.2-2. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #769564 to the same value

Re: Bug#769072: gnome-shell: GNOME Shell crashing with "Oh no, something went wrong"

2014-11-15 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 12:30:34 +0100, Janusz S. Bien wrote: > Quote/Cytat - Julien Cristau (sob, 15 lis 2014, > 10:48:51): > > >On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 23:42:37 +, Simon McVittie wrote: > > > >>I think the problem here is that something is not right in the > >>dependencies for the i965_dri

Re: Bug#769072: gnome-shell: GNOME Shell crashing with "Oh no, something went wrong"

2014-11-15 Thread Janusz S. Bien
Quote/Cytat - maximilian attems (sob, 15 lis 2014, 20:45:03): On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 02:13:58PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 12:30:34 +0100, Janusz S. Bien wrote: > Quote/Cytat - Julien Cristau (sob, 15 lis 2014, > 10:48:51): > > >On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 23:42:37 +00

Re: Bug#769072: gnome-shell: GNOME Shell crashing with "Oh no, something went wrong"

2014-11-15 Thread maximilian attems
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 02:13:58PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 12:30:34 +0100, Janusz S. Bien wrote: > > > Quote/Cytat - Julien Cristau (sob, 15 lis 2014, > > 10:48:51): > > > > >On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 23:42:37 +, Simon McVittie wrote: > > > > > >>I think the prob

Processed: block 769301 with 765933

2014-11-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 769301 with 765933 Bug #769301 [java3d] java3d: FTBFS error: unknown type name 'GLintptr' 769301 was not blocked by any bugs. 769301 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 769301: 765933 > thanks Stopping processing here. Pleas

Re: Bug#769072: gnome-shell: GNOME Shell crashing with "Oh no, something went wrong"

2014-11-15 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 2014-11-15 14:13, Julien Cristau wrote: > Looks like nvidia took over libGL but not the server-side libglx.so. > That can't possibly work; can the nvidia packages not do that? It should ... (not diverting, but placing its libglx.so in the front of the search path, controlled by alternatives) P

Re: Bug#769072: gnome-shell: GNOME Shell crashing with "Oh no, something went wrong"

2014-11-15 Thread Janusz S. Bien
Quote/Cytat - Andreas Beckmann (sob, 15 lis 2014, 21:26:04): On 2014-11-15 14:13, Julien Cristau wrote: Looks like nvidia took over libGL but not the server-side libglx.so. That can't possibly work; can the nvidia packages not do that? It should ... (not diverting, but placing its libglx.so

Re: Bug#769072: gnome-shell: GNOME Shell crashing with "Oh no, something went wrong"

2014-11-15 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 2014-11-15 21:53, Janusz S. Bien wrote: > Quote/Cytat - Andreas Beckmann (sob, 15 lis 2014, >> /usr/share/bug/libgl1-nvidia-glx/script 3>nvidia.log > > Enclosed. Thanks. Does not look like something is broken (except for having the nvidia packages installed manually on a system that does not