mesa: Changes to 'debian-experimental'

2012-11-19 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Makefile.am | 62 +++ bin/.cherry-ignore | 10 bin/get-pick-list.sh| 29 + configs/default |2 configure.ac

mesa: Changes to 'upstream-experimental'

2012-11-19 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Makefile.am | 62 +++ bin/.cherry-ignore | 10 bin/get-pick-list.sh| 29 + configs/default |2 configure.ac

mesa: Changes to 'ubuntu-quantal'

2012-11-19 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
New branch 'ubuntu-quantal' available with the following commits: -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1tap88-00057c...@vasks.debian.org

mesa: Changes to 'ubuntu'

2012-11-19 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Makefile.am | 62 +++ bin/.cherry-ignore | 10 bin/get-pick-list.sh| 29 + configs/default |2 configure.ac

mesa: Changes to 'debian-experimental'

2012-11-19 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
debian/changelog |1 + debian/control |2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) New commits: commit 305bea7d042e0db8858845d51aab06781212967e Author: Maarten Lankhorst Date: Mon Nov 19 12:19:27 2012 +0100 control: Bump libwayland-dev build-dep to 0.99. diff --git a/

Processed: found 640464 in 1:1.0.1-4

2012-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 640464 1:1.0.1-4 Bug #640464 [xserver-xorg-video-nouveau] in xterm, some rectangles are not redrawn when the window is partly covered Marked as found in versions xserver-xorg-video-nouveau/1:1.0.1-4. > thanks Stopping processing here. Plea

wayland: Changes to 'upstream-experimental'

2012-11-19 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
.gitignore |2 Makefile.am|6 TODO | 21 configure.ac | 28 cursor/Makefile.am |1 cursor/convert_fon

wayland: Changes to 'debian-experimental'

2012-11-19 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
.gitignore |2 Makefile.am|6 TODO | 21 configure.ac | 28 cursor/Makefile.am |1 cursor/convert_fon

Bug#693726: xserver-xorg-input-synaptics: synaptics crashes after wakeup

2012-11-19 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 13:41:00 -0500, Sajith T S wrote: > Package: xserver-xorg-input-synaptics > Version: 1.6.2-2 > Severity: important > > To be sure, synaptics doesn't crash each time the laptop is back from > suspend. I'm not sure how to reliably reproduce this. The symptom is > an unresp

xorg-server: Changes to 'ubuntu'

2012-11-19 Thread Timo Aaltonen
debian/changelog |7 +++ debian/patches/500_pointer_barrier_thresholds.diff |6 -- 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) New commits: commit a3c6110370d05c73f3bc7984c4f6e6a7375c7d63 Author: Timo Aaltonen Date: Mon Nov 19 12:16:32 20

Bug#693726: xserver-xorg-input-synaptics: synaptics crashes after wakeup

2012-11-19 Thread Sajith T S
Julien Cristau wrote: > Try rebuilding the synaptics driver with debug info, and running X under > valgrind until you reproduce... X under valgrind? Surely you're joking? :) -- "the lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne." -- Chaucer. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x

Bug#693726: xserver-xorg-input-synaptics: synaptics crashes after wakeup

2012-11-19 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 15:08:29 -0500, Sajith T S wrote: > Julien Cristau wrote: > > > Try rebuilding the synaptics driver with debug info, and running X under > > valgrind until you reproduce... > > X under valgrind? Surely you're joking? :) > I'm not. (But yes, that makes it dog slow. So

Bug#693726: xserver-xorg-input-synaptics: synaptics crashes after wakeup

2012-11-19 Thread Sajith T S
Julien Cristau wrote: > I'm not. (But yes, that makes it dog slow. So it's easier when there's > a quick way to reproduce the bug...) Correct me if I'm wrong: I'm not sure valgrind can help here, since this is an assertion triggering rather than a memory or threading error. I have installed t

Bug#693726: xserver-xorg-input-synaptics: synaptics crashes after wakeup

2012-11-19 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 16:54:15 -0500, Sajith T S wrote: > Julien Cristau wrote: > > > I'm not. (But yes, that makes it dog slow. So it's easier when there's > > a quick way to reproduce the bug...) > > Correct me if I'm wrong: I'm not sure valgrind can help here, since > this is an assertio

Bug#654329: marked as done (libdrm: FTBFS when atomic operations are only available through libatomic-ops-dev)

2012-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 19 Nov 2012 23:30:01 + (UTC) with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#654329: libdrm: FTBFS when atomic operations are only available through libatomic-ops-dev has caused the Debian Bug report #654329, regarding libdrm: FTBFS when atomic operations are only available t