shirish शिरीष (03/05/2012):
> Can somebody lemme know where the bug-report is ?
No bug report, since the release team knows the xorg team very well (and
vice versa), and bug reports would mean overhead.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 2:1.12.1-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Did a fresh install of Debian for my desktop computer. Tried to install desktop
with:
apt-get install task-desktop
Dependency problems arose with xserver-xorg-video-all that did
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Well i looked over it again and it seems that xserver-xorg was installed.
And here my solution for the startx script ... i am not sure where to
put it.
(The file looks a bit broken with all those empty lines and id use $()
instead of backticks but i
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 06:02:15 +, Paul Wise wrote:
> debian/xserver-xorg-core.postinst | 52
> +
I'm very much not in favour of adding such complexity to maintainer
scripts.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Tag 'libxfont-1_1.4.5-2' created by Cyril Brulebois at
2012-05-03 18:09 +
Tagging upload of libxfont 1:1.4.5-2 to unstable.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEABECAAYFAk+iycEACgkQeGfVPHR5Nd0PawCfTYR6rnJztZrP9rvkQkd9QVLA
4OkAoIwVmcSbbN8OMs310ZoXeExyGQn7
=gZ0
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
The video drivers listed in $subject use {in,out}{b,w,l} functions,
which the X server no longer provides on ia64.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
debian/changelog |7 +++
debian/rules |3 +++
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
New commits:
commit 5dbabca0a4af39ad9f6560b55bde5e0d16c8e45f
Author: Cyril Brulebois
Date: Thu May 3 19:59:52 2012 +0200
Upload to unstable.
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
in
libxfont_1.4.5-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libxfont_1.4.5-2.dsc
libxfont_1.4.5-2.diff.gz
libxfont1_1.4.5-2_amd64.deb
libxfont1-udeb_1.4.5-2_amd64.udeb
libxfont1-dbg_1.4.5-2_amd64.deb
libxfont-dev_1.4.5-2_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your De
Accepted:
libxfont-dev_1.4.5-2_amd64.deb
to main/libx/libxfont/libxfont-dev_1.4.5-2_amd64.deb
libxfont1-dbg_1.4.5-2_amd64.deb
to main/libx/libxfont/libxfont1-dbg_1.4.5-2_amd64.deb
libxfont1-udeb_1.4.5-2_amd64.udeb
to main/libx/libxfont/libxfont1-udeb_1.4.5-2_amd64.udeb
libxfont1_1.4.5-2_am
Hello,
after an update that was within the last 2-3 days the mousewheel stopped
working when the mouse was moved at the same time in a game (quake3)...
i downgraded xserver-xorg-input-mouse (and depending packages) to
squeeze to fix it..
that also downgraded the other input packages and som
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 21:04:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#660411: fixed in libxi 2:1.3-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #660411,
regarding libxi6: Memory corruption when used with recent X servers
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Notes:
Mapping squeeze to stable.
Mapping stable to proposed-updates.
Accepted:
libxi-dev_1.3-7_amd64.deb
to main/libx/libxi/libxi-dev_1.3-7_amd64.deb
libxi6-dbg_1.3-7_amd64.deb
to main/libx/libxi/libxi6-dbg_1.3-7_amd64.deb
libxi6-udeb_1.3-7_amd64.udeb
to main/libx/libxi/libxi6-udeb_1.3-7
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 21:04:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#661021: fixed in libxi 2:1.3-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #661021,
regarding xinput --list crashes
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
xserver-xorg-video-apm | 1:1.2.3-2+b2 | ia64
xserver-xorg-video-ark | 1:0.7.4-1 | ia64
xserver-xorg-video-chips | 1:1.2.4-1+b2 | ia64
xserver-xorg-video-cirrus | 1:1.4.0-1 | ia64
xserver-
at bottom :-
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> shirish शिरीष (03/05/2012):
>> Can somebody lemme know where the bug-report is ?
>
> No bug report, since the release team knows the xorg team very well (and
> vice versa), and bug reports would mean overhead.
Thank you for r
On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 18:55 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> I'm very much not in favour of adding such complexity to maintainer
> scripts.
Would it be acceptable to add it to a shell script instead?
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally si
16 matches
Mail list logo