Michael Biebl (27/01/2012):
> Sean, any objections to apply this patch? If you are no longer
> interested in compiz / lack time I could offer to upload an NMU.
I think we're having a recurring lack of manpower for the compiz
packages, explaining why we're still stuck with 0.8 (and its bugs) in
un
debian/changelog | 10
debian/control |2
debian/patches/500_pointer_barrier_thresholds.diff | 559 +
debian/patches/series |3
4 files changed, 573 insertions(+), 1
New branch 'ubuntu' available with the following commits:
commit 9e5041527c2f84820c54cddcfeb4ca434f1da304
Author: Christopher James Halse Rogers
Date: Fri Jan 27 18:21:54 2012 +1100
Add patchsys, and proposed XFIXES v6 protocol
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.or
debian/changelog | 38 --
debian/control |6 -
debian/libxfixes3.symbols|3
debian/patches/01_fixesproto-v6.diff | 202 +++
debian/patches/series|2
debian/rules
I managed to create the attached backtrace by adding the -core option
to GDM’s Xorg call and then using
$ gdb -c corefile /usr/bin/xorg
(gdb) set logging on
(gdb) bt full
(gdb) quit
Best regards,
Claudius
#0 0x7f3c7ab9e405 in *__GI_raise (sig=) at
../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:64
debian/changelog |6 ++--
debian/control | 46 +
debian/libxatracker-dev.install.in |5
debian/libxatracker1.install.in|1
debian/libxatracker1.symbols | 31
5 files c
Hi Sean,
On 27.01.2012 06:38, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
> Sean, any objections to apply this patch? If you are no longer
> interested in compiz / lack time I could offer to upload an NMU.
>
I went ahead and uploaded an NMU to DELAYED/10. Just let me know if you
are not ok with the proposed patch a
compiz_0.8.4-5.1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
compiz_0.8.4-5.1.dsc
compiz_0.8.4-5.1.diff.gz
compiz_0.8.4-5.1_all.deb
compiz-core_0.8.4-5.1_amd64.deb
compiz-dev_0.8.4-5.1_amd64.deb
compiz-gtk_0.8.4-5.1_amd64.deb
compiz-kde_0.8.4-5.1_amd64.deb
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 15:49:42 +0100, Claudius Hubig wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg
> Version: 1:7.6+10
> Severity: normal
>
> X crashes/restarts when I am trying to view a huge file in eog or iceweasel
> (both current from testing). Viewing the same file in Opera 11.61 is no
> problem.
>
Look
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 20:41:33 +0100, Claudius Hubig wrote:
> Julien Cristau wrote:
> >On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 15:49:42 +0100, Claudius Hubig wrote:
> >> X crashes/restarts when I am trying to view a huge file in eog or iceweasel
> >> (both current from testing). Viewing the same file in Opera
Julien Cristau wrote:
>Can you report that upstream according to
>http://intellinuxgraphics.org/how_to_report_bug.html?
>Let us know the bug number for tracking.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45323
I would like to ask you to have a look at said bug report, just to
make sure I didn
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 657634 xserver-xorg-video-intel
Bug #657634 [xserver-xorg] X crashes when viewing huge images with Caught
signal 7 (Bus error)
Bug reassigned from package 'xserver-xorg' to 'xserver-xorg-video-intel'.
Bug No longer marked as found in ver
There has been some discussion in Ubuntu lately about whether the
accidental problems users cause when using compizconfig-settings-manager
justify the remove of the package from our archives all together.
One of our community contributors, who wants to keep ccsm around, has
proposed this patch
OK, now after some testing I have encountered a weird problem:
I have 8 Workstains base on the AsusTek A7V600-X Mainboard with CPUs of
AMD Sempron, Athlon and Geode. All Workstations running with 2/3 GByte
DDR400 memory.
I use mainly the Matrox G45+MDHA16D/OE6 (VGA Dual-Head, AGP) which works
Der Julien,
I'm sorry for this false bug report. I have a somewhat complex .xinitrc and
the behaviour of gnome-settings-daemon changed with the release of GNOME
3.0 so i had to background it and that fixed it.
Please excuse the inconvenience.
You can delete this bug report.
Sincerely,
Adrian K
15 matches
Mail list logo
