Rebased ref, commits from common ancestor:
commit c2e73526435eee9b92d50efd4a97c80536e03e4b
Author: Sven Joachim
Date: Wed Jan 18 19:38:33 2012 +0100
Remove reference to i810 from debian/rules
Missed in commit 37efab84461729859f7606e39f687905a3f1cc6a.
diff --git a/debian/rules b/de
Tag 'xorg-server-2_1.11.3.901-2' created by Cyril Brulebois
at 2012-01-19 09:59 +
Tagging upload of xorg-server 2:1.11.3.901-2 to unstable.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEABECAAYFAk8X6ZAACgkQeGfVPHR5Nd2KaACgm64i7l9AYa4fcjmgBfv3g9Bt
GmYAoIWxSMCmWKw/3EpYI
debian/changelog|9 +++
dix/grabs.c | 112
hw/xfree86/dixmods/xkbPrivate.c | 15 -
include/dixgrabs.h |3 -
4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 130 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 0b63406149375
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.6+10
Severity: critical
Tags: security
X-Debbugs-CC: secure-testing-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
- --- Please enter the report below this line. ---
When you have any screensaver running (like Xscreensaver) and hit
Ct
xorg-server_1.11.3.901-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
xorg-server_1.11.3.901-2.dsc
xorg-server_1.11.3.901-2.diff.gz
xserver-common_1.11.3.901-2_all.deb
xserver-xorg-core_1.11.3.901-2_amd64.deb
xserver-xorg-core-udeb_1.11.3.901-2_amd64.udeb
xserv
Your message dated Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:19:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#656410: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.11.3.901-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #656410,
regarding xorg-server: screen lockers bypassed via key combo
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Accepted:
xdmx-tools_1.11.3.901-2_amd64.deb
to main/x/xorg-server/xdmx-tools_1.11.3.901-2_amd64.deb
xdmx_1.11.3.901-2_amd64.deb
to main/x/xorg-server/xdmx_1.11.3.901-2_amd64.deb
xnest_1.11.3.901-2_amd64.deb
to main/x/xorg-server/xnest_1.11.3.901-2_amd64.deb
xorg-server_1.11.3.901-2.diff.gz
forcemerge 656410 656429
thanks
Felicitus (19/01/2012):
> When you have any screensaver running (like Xscreensaver) and hit
> Ctrl+Alt+*, the screensaver is killed.
>
> See http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.oss.general/6725
Thanks, but already fixed, see above-mentioned bug.
Mraw,
K
Your message dated Thu, 19 Jan 2012 12:19:19 +0100
with message-id <20120119111919.gc29...@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#656429: [xserver-xorg]
Ctrl+Alt+* (multiply) kills running screensaver
has caused the Debian Bug report #656429,
regarding [xserver-xorg] Ctr
Tag 'pixman-0.24.2-1' created by Cyril Brulebois at
2012-01-19 12:20 +
Tagging upload of pixman 0.24.2-1 to unstable.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEABECAAYFAk8YCqsACgkQeGfVPHR5Nd1MdwCgwJToYgMTRL/G7VXJreS0h4Oi
vJcAoKmWIubUzZWi8nJU5wVjpAvZbvwc
=XAeu
ChangeLog| 132 +++
autogen.sh |4 -
configure.ac |4 -
debian/changelog |7 ++
pixman/pixman-bits-image.c | 53 ---
pixman/pixman-combine.c.templa
autogen.sh |4 ++
configure.ac |4 +-
pixman/pixman-bits-image.c | 53
pixman/pixman-combine.c.template |6 ++--
pixman/pixman-cpu.c | 56 ++
pixman
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:53:24AM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> Temporary solution:
> http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/01/19/7
>
I've tested the following workaround :
xmodmap -e 'keysym 0x1008fe21 = KP_Multiply'
and restarting gnome-screensaver if it was killed previously ;)
Worka
pixman_0.24.2-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
pixman_0.24.2-1.dsc
pixman_0.24.2.orig.tar.gz
pixman_0.24.2-1.diff.gz
libpixman-1-0_0.24.2-1_amd64.deb
libpixman-1-0-udeb_0.24.2-1_amd64.udeb
libpixman-1-0-dbg_0.24.2-1_amd64.deb
libpixman-1-dev_0.2
Accepted:
libpixman-1-0-dbg_0.24.2-1_amd64.deb
to main/p/pixman/libpixman-1-0-dbg_0.24.2-1_amd64.deb
libpixman-1-0-udeb_0.24.2-1_amd64.udeb
to main/p/pixman/libpixman-1-0-udeb_0.24.2-1_amd64.udeb
libpixman-1-0_0.24.2-1_amd64.deb
to main/p/pixman/libpixman-1-0_0.24.2-1_amd64.deb
libpixman-1
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package xserver-xorg-video-intel
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #651741 (http://bugs.debian.org/651741)
# Bug title: gnome-power-mana
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 2:1.11.3.901-1
Severity: critical
Tags: security
X-Debbugs-CC: secure-testing-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
It is possible to kill every screensaver/screen locker program
(gnome-screensaver, kscreenlocker, slock, slimlock...) on the latest
version of Xorg (1.11)
Your message dated Thu, 19 Jan 2012 18:32:53 +0100
with message-id <20120119173253.gb25...@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#656494: [xserver-xorg-core] All screen-lockers broken
by a keypress (Ctrl+Alt+* (keypad))
has caused the Debian Bug report #656494,
regarding [xserver-xorg-core] All screen
debian/not-installed |6 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
New commits:
commit 0e055af7800d34d8e5cdb48347abe9ce51a5130b
Author: Sven Joachim
Date: Thu Jan 19 18:30:35 2012 +0100
Add several i386-specific files to debian/not-installed
diff --git a/debian/not-instal
Package: xkb-data
Version: 2.3-2
Severity: grave
Tags: security upstream
Justification: user security hole
As originally reported at:
---
http://gu1.aeroxteam.fr/2012/01/19/bypass-screensaver-locker-program-xorg-111-and-up/
and further syndicated by:
---
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?p
severity 656500 important
thanks
Mark Nipper (19/01/2012):
> http://gu1.aeroxteam.fr/2012/01/19/bypass-screensaver-locker-program-xorg-111-and-up/
>
> and further syndicated by:
> ---
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTA0NTA
>
> the currently shipping version of this package
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 656500 important
Bug #656500 [xkb-data] xkb-data: XF86_Ungrab and XF86_ClearGrab security hole
upstream
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
656500: h
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:30:23 +0100, Sylvain wrote:
> My question is ultimately: can a classic desktop environment run the
> GLES2-only version?
> (e.g. my Athlon II desktop with its Radeon HD 5450)
>
With the free intel/nouveau/radeon drivers, yes.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 655974 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44874
Bug #655974 [xserver-xorg-video-intel] GPU hangs often on Sandybridge HD3000
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44874'.
> thanks
Stoppi
On 19 Jan 2012, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Downgrading severity per:
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/x/xorg-server/news/20120119T101901Z.html
Excellent. I had looked around for a previously reported
bug, but missed this one. Sorry for the noise!
--
Mark Nipper
ni...@bitgnome.net (XMPP)
Mark Nipper (19/01/2012):
> Excellent. I had looked around for a previously reported
> bug, but missed this one. Sorry for the noise!
No problem, there are src:xorg-server, xserver-xorg, xserver-xorg-core,
and xkb-data already. Hopefully that will do for the evening. :-p
Mraw,
KiBi.
si
Package: xserver-xorg-video-radeon
Version: 1:6.14.3-2
Severity: important
My machine was on squeeze and X worked, without OpenGl etc. For another reason
I upgraded the kernel to the wheezy version. After the kernel upgrade I had not
X any more. I upgraded xserver-xorg including xserver-xorg-vid
Your message dated Thu, 19 Jan 2012 23:52:58 +0100
with message-id <20120119225258.ga26...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#656528: xserver-xorg-video-radeon: needs stricter
dependency on libdrm-radeon1 and libkms1
has caused the Debian Bug report #656528,
regarding xserver-xorg-video-r
Please use CVE-2012-0064 for this issue.
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/01/19/6
--
-- Kurt Seifried / Red Hat Security Response Team
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Please use CVE-2012-0064 for this issue.
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/01/19/6
-- -- Kurt Seifried / Red Hat Security Response Team
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
A
This appears to be a duplicate of 656494
--
-- Kurt Seifried / Red Hat Security Response Team
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f18a2a6.40...@redhat.co
debian/changelog | 10 +++
debian/patches/220_dont_scale_indirect.patch | 34
debian/patches/221_pointer_motion_update_fix.patch| 34
debian/patches/222_touch_valuators_absolute.patch | 49 ++
d
debian/changelog|9
debian/control |5
debian/patches/127_multitouch.patch | 745
debian/patches/series |1
4 files changed, 756 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 906dfcfdb5
debian/changelog|7 +++
debian/patches/127_multitouch.patch | 21 -
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit cf08f0bf8f82a31379a344e6ccc8053a36fd3954
Author: Chase Douglas
Date: Thu Jan 19 17:44:52 2012 -0800
r
New branch 'ubuntu-oneiric' available with the following commits:
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ro3b3-0001i8...@vasks.debian.org
>Carl Fink (15/01/2012):
>> Versions of packages xserver-xorg-video-radeon suggests:
>> pn firmware-linux
>what if you install this package?
This has no effect at all.
Thanks.
Carl Fink
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
On Don, 2012-01-19 at 22:38 +0100, Ralf Neubauer wrote:
>
> [...] IIRC the message was:
>
> (II) [KMS] drm report modesetting isn't supported.
> (EE) RADEON(0): [dri] RADEONDRIGetVersion failed because of a version
> mismatch.
> [dri] This chipset requires a kernel module version of 1.17.0,
> [
37 matches
Mail list logo
