Bug#654630: Please review this diff for atomic ops in mesa on m68k

2012-01-10 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Dear m68k porters, mesa FTBFS on m68k due to lack of GCC atomic intrinsics. (Why are they (still) missing, anyway?) I’ve had a look at other patches floating around on this mailing list and drafted the attached diff which makes it at least compile again. My knowledge is not enough to validate that

x11proto-input: Changes to 'upstream-experimental'

2012-01-10 Thread Cyril Brulebois
XI2.h |1 + configure.ac |2 +- specs/XI2proto.txt | 28 +--- 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) New commits: commit 1306ccf9f262c0c699bec093ffdc4b6695601599 Author: Peter Hutterer Date: Fri Jan 6 13:35:25 2012 +1000 inp

x11proto-input: Changes to 'refs/tags/x11proto-input-2.1.99.5-1'

2012-01-10 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Tag 'x11proto-input-2.1.99.5-1' created by Cyril Brulebois at 2012-01-10 09:05 + Tagging upload of x11proto-input 2.1.99.5-1 to experimental. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk8L/1kACgkQeGfVPHR5Nd3yFACfdmPsI+668Uz24jUCzcqUPSgb X74AoJTrx1bt8xsFSYH

x11proto-input: Changes to 'debian-experimental'

2012-01-10 Thread Cyril Brulebois
ChangeLog | 63 + XI2.h |1 configure.ac |2 - debian/changelog |6 + specs/XI2proto.txt | 28 ++- 5 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) New commits: commit 3a10

Processing of x11proto-input_2.1.99.5-1_source+all.changes

2012-01-10 Thread Debian FTP Masters
x11proto-input_2.1.99.5-1_source+all.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: x11proto-input_2.1.99.5-1.dsc x11proto-input_2.1.99.5.orig.tar.gz x11proto-input_2.1.99.5-1.diff.gz x11proto-input-dev_2.1.99.5-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (runn

x11proto-input_2.1.99.5-1_source+all.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

2012-01-10 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: x11proto-input-dev_2.1.99.5-1_all.deb to main/x/x11proto-input/x11proto-input-dev_2.1.99.5-1_all.deb x11proto-input_2.1.99.5-1.diff.gz to main/x/x11proto-input/x11proto-input_2.1.99.5-1.diff.gz x11proto-input_2.1.99.5-1.dsc to main/x/x11proto-input/x11proto-input_2.1.99.5-1.dsc x

Bug#654630: Please review this diff for atomic ops in mesa on m68k

2012-01-10 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 09:56, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > mesa FTBFS on m68k due to lack of GCC atomic intrinsics. (Why are > they (still) missing, anyway?) I’ve had a look at other patches Perhaps Andreas knows? > floating around on this mailing list and drafted the attached diff > which makes it

xserver-xorg-input-evdev: Changes to 'ubuntu'

2012-01-10 Thread Chase Douglas
ChangeLog | 101 configure.ac | 18 debian/changelog | 24 + debian/control

xorg-server: Changes to 'ubuntu+1'

2012-01-10 Thread Chase Douglas
ChangeLog | 42 + Xi/exevents.c | 20 - Xi/xiproperty.c|2 - configure.ac |2 - debian/changelog |7 ++ debian/patches/2

Bug#655318: cherrypick upstream patch to fix drawing bugs (and add -dbg pkg)

2012-01-10 Thread Serge Hallyn
Package: xserver-xorg-video-qxl Version: 0.0.16-1 Hi, using certain window managers over spice, we found corrupted drawables https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-qxl/+bug/913314 and xorg segfaults https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-qxl/+bug/913311

Bug#654630: Please review this diff for atomic ops in mesa on m68k

2012-01-10 Thread Andreas Schwab
Geert Uytterhoeven writes: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 09:56, Thorsten Glaser wrote: >> mesa FTBFS on m68k due to lack of GCC atomic intrinsics. (Why are >> they (still) missing, anyway?) I’ve had a look at other patches > > Perhaps Andreas knows? They are now implemented in 4.7. Andreas. -- A

Bug#654630: Please review this diff for atomic ops in mesa on m68k

2012-01-10 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 13:55, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Geert Uytterhoeven writes: > >> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 09:56, Thorsten Glaser wrote: >>> mesa FTBFS on m68k due to lack of GCC atomic intrinsics. (Why are >>> they (still) missing, anyway?) I’ve had a look at other patches >> >> Perhaps And

Bug#654630: Please review this diff for atomic ops in mesa on m68k

2012-01-10 Thread Andreas Schwab
Geert Uytterhoeven writes: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 13:55, Andreas Schwab wrote: >> Geert Uytterhoeven writes: >> >>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 09:56, Thorsten Glaser wrote: mesa FTBFS on m68k due to lack of GCC atomic intrinsics. (Why are they (still) missing, anyway?) I’ve had a loo

Bug#654630: Please review this diff for atomic ops in mesa on m68k

2012-01-10 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Geert Uytterhoeven dixit: >CAS is a read-modify-write instruction, which is not guaranteed to work >on all m68k platforms (hence the existence of CONFIG_RMW_INSNS in >the kernel). All platforms currently supported by Debian (that is, not Coldfire and with MMU) should have it, right? I think other

Bug#654630: Please review this diff for atomic ops in mesa on m68k

2012-01-10 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 20:09, Thorsten Glaser wrote: >>CAS is a read-modify-write instruction, which is not guaranteed to work >>on all m68k platforms (hence the existence of CONFIG_RMW_INSNS in >>the kernel). > > All platforms currently supported by Debian (that is, not Coldfire and > with MMU)

Bug#655384: [x11-xkb-utils] compose+'+c produces wrong result in most applications (eg. gvim, iceweasel)

2012-01-10 Thread darkestkhan
Package: x11-xkb-utils Version: 7.6+4 Severity: important --- Please enter the report below this line. --- compose+'+c should produce 'ć', but it is producing 'ç' (which is generated by compose+,+c) instead. The only application, that I know of, that is not affected by this is reportbug-ng. ---

Bug#655384: [x11-xkb-utils] compose+'+c produces wrong result in most applications (eg. gvim, iceweasel)

2012-01-10 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 20:00:52 +, darkestkhan wrote: > compose+'+c should produce 'ć', but it is producing 'ç' (which is > generated by compose+,+c) instead. The only application, that I know > of, that is not affected by this is reportbug-ng. > It doesn't here. You'll have to give more in

Processed: severity of 655384 is normal, tagging 655384

2012-01-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 655384 normal Bug #655384 [x11-xkb-utils] [x11-xkb-utils] compose+'+c produces wrong result in most applications (eg. gvim, iceweasel) Severity set to 'normal' from 'important' > tags 655384 + unreproducible moreinfo Bug #655384 [x11-xk