On Don, 2011-09-29 at 15:47 +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
>
> (1) Is xserver-xorg-video-ati still necessary, or can i install only
> xserver-xorg-video-radeon and avoid the above problem?
-ati is only necessary for automatic loading of the radeon driver. If
you have a xorg.conf with at least a S
Michel Dänzer writes:
>> (1) Is xserver-xorg-video-ati still necessary, or can i install only
>> xserver-xorg-video-radeon and avoid the above problem?
>
> -ati is only necessary for automatic loading of the radeon driver. If
> you have a xorg.conf with at least a Section "Device" for Driver
>
Il giorno sab, 02/07/2011 alle 16.59 +0200, Cyril Brulebois ha scritto:
> Pietro Battiston (02/07/2011):
> > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38909
>
> thanks, marking as forwarded there with the above command (and
> control@bugs.d.o in bcc).
>
> > If that helps and it is not terribl
Hi there, I have the same problem since yesterday. But, the little lag in X
applications (affects KDE and GNOME) is higher in applications like gthumb,
specially when it's showing thumbnails or chrome to switching between
tabs...
Linux version: Linux bahamuth 3.0.0-1-686-pae
Xorg updated packages
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:05:11PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> I don't understand what this report is saying. There doesn't seem to be
> anything wrong and your explanations seem confused.
Panning no longer works. Sorry if that wasn't clear.
To be more precise, I suspect that there is some pa
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package mesa
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package mesa
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #617757 (http://bugs.debian.org/617757)
# Bug title: /usr/lib/dri/i965_dri.so: mutter: in
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package xserver-xorg-video-intel
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #629510 (http://bugs.debian.org/629510)
# Bug title: xserver-xorg-vid
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package xorg-server
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #642433 (http://bugs.debian.org/642433)
# Bug title: xserver-xorg-core: crashes on
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:xorg
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #597644 (http://bugs.debian.org/597644)
# Bug title: plasma-widgets-workspace: transp
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 15:47:55 +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> For a long time, I haven't been able to upgrade xorg on my system
> because it I use "xserver-xorg-video-ati", which depends on
> "xserver-xorg-video-r128", which is out-of-date w/r/t the rest of xorg.
>
What do you mean "out of date w/
reassign 643706 nvidia-graphics-drivers
kthxbye
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 00:01:46 +0200, M Z wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:02 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > Run '/usr/share/bug/xorg/script 3> 643706.txt' and send the resulting
> > file to this bug.
> >
> > Please use reportbug next time so m
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 643706 nvidia-graphics-drivers
Bug #643706 [xserver-common] [xserver-common] Gnome desktop environment lags
and lockups with excessive Xorg CPU usage afer upgrading
Bug reassigned from package 'xserver-common' to 'nvidia-graphics-drivers
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 13:38:54 +0200, Edward Welbourne wrote:
> Bug: a failing run of dexconf should at least report this !
> Reconfiguring xserver-xorg should, ideally, at least fail with $? set
> when dexconf fails.
>
Actually dexconf should stop existing.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 643762 nvidia-graphics-drivers
Bug #643762 [xserver-xorg-core] xserver-xorg-core: xorg works very slow with
KDE and GNOME after xserver upgrade
Bug reassigned from package 'xserver-xorg-core' to 'nvidia-graphics-drivers'.
Bug No longer m
debian/changelog |7 +++
debian/local/51-synaptics-quirks.conf |6 +++---
debian/local/66-xorg-synaptics.rules | 13 -
debian/rules |2 ++
4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit f1fd1ef4b1
debian/changelog|4 ++--
debian/local/66-xorg-synaptics-quirks.rules | 13 +
debian/rules|2 --
debian/xserver-xorg-input-synaptics.install |2 ++
4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
New commits:
c
Le jeudi 29 septembre 2011 à 12:47 +0100, David Rogers a écrit :
> I thought I'd add that I am also running nVidia drivers installed
> through Debian with no Compositing window manager.
>
> 2011-09-28 08:04:16 status installed xserver-common 2:1.11.1-1
> 2011-09-28 08:04:16 status installed xser
debian/local/51-synaptics-quirks.conf |6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit c0568fa5c72aead52a3de36eb78b59670e7b5fe3
Author: Timo Aaltonen
Date: Thu Sep 29 21:45:02 2011 +0300
And change the xorg conf snippet back..
diff --git a/debian/local/5
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 21:18:17 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 29 septembre 2011 à 12:47 +0100, David Rogers a écrit :
> > I thought I'd add that I am also running nVidia drivers installed
> > through Debian with no Compositing window manager.
> >
> > 2011-09-28 08:04:16 status inst
>> Bug: a failing run of dexconf should at least report this !
>> Reconfiguring xserver-xorg should, ideally, at least fail with $? set
>> when dexconf fails.
>>
> Actually dexconf should stop existing.
OK, and what will create my xorg.conf file ?
Or what do I need to configure, instead, to tell t
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 21:20:02 +0200, Edward Welbourne wrote:
> >> Bug: a failing run of dexconf should at least report this !
> >> Reconfiguring xserver-xorg should, ideally, at least fail with $? set
> >> when dexconf fails.
> >>
> > Actually dexconf should stop existing.
>
> OK, and what wil
Hi again Julien,
and thanks for your assistance.
> Section "Monitor"
> Identifier ""
> Option "Rotate" "left"
> EndSection
I take it you mean an xorg.conf containing *only* this section will
suffice; any content in xorg.conf will be merged to what would have
been used without it.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 22:45:48 +0200, Edward Welbourne wrote:
> Hi again Julien,
>
> and thanks for your assistance.
>
> > Section "Monitor"
> > Identifier ""
> > Option "Rotate" "left"
> > EndSection
>
> I take it you mean an xorg.conf containing *only* this section will
> su
debian/changelog|5 +++--
debian/xserver-xorg-input-synaptics.postinst.in |2 +-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 341f8ba26546b3db8cf2a761bba7632f9ae7bc80
Author: Timo Aaltonen
Date: Thu Sep 29 22:17:12 2011 +0300
Julien Cristau writes:
>> For a long time, I haven't been able to upgrade xorg on my system
>> because it I use "xserver-xorg-video-ati", which depends on
>> "xserver-xorg-video-r128", which is out-of-date w/r/t the rest of xorg.
>>
> What do you mean "out of date w/r/t the rest of xorg"?
[Sorry
26 matches
Mail list logo
