Salut Vince,
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 13:13:37 +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> I do not know if this bug is for the intel driver or the xorg server. Please,
> reassign if I made a mistake.
>
> At work, I've two screen: the internal LCD panel of my laptop and an external
> DVI screen plug into a d
Vincent Danjean wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel
> Version: 2:2.9.0-1
> Severity: normal
>
>Hi,
>
> I do not know if this bug is for the intel driver or the xorg server. Please,
> reassign if I made a mistake.
>
> At work, I've two screen: the internal LCD panel of my laptop and an ex
I have succesfully reloaded Xorg server after upgrade from 1.6.3.901-1
to 1.6.4-2.
Thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 548045 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24255
Bug #548045 [xserver-xorg-video-intel] video-intel: [945GM] DVI monitor not
detected
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24255'.
> kthx
forwarded 548045 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24255
kthxbye
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 03:03:07 +0200, Michal Suchanek
wrote:
> Then I don't have modesetting because I did not add anything like that
> to my kernel command line.
I know, I was asking you to try and see if things wor
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 23:58:35 +0200, Arnt wrote in message
<20090930235835.35839...@a45.fmb.no>:
> On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:50:57 +0200, Arnt wrote in message
> <20090930155057.28422.50764.report...@a45.fmb.no>:
>
> > Package: xserver-xorg-core
> > Version: 2:1.6.4-1
> > Severity: normal
> >
> >
Package: x11-xserver-utils
Version: 7.4+2
Severity: normal
I had the same problem than the original bug report, and I solved it when I ran
GNOME to get a valid .Xmodmap with -pke.
But:
Some unicode characters don't work, especially non-printing characters like
U2060 or spaces like emspace.
I mo
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package xorg-server
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debi
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package xorg-server
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #529927 (http://bugs.debian.org/529927)
# * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package xserver-xorg-video-intel
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #548045 (http://bugs.debian.org/548045)
# * https://bugs.freedesktop
package: xresprobe
severity: important
version: 0.4.23debian1-0.1
Hi,
ddcprobe doesn't detect my 2nd monitor :( Due to #336764 I don't know if this
is a usage problem or if I should provide more information ;-)
As having more than one monitor has become quite common, I've set the severity
to i
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 02:09:51 +0800, Holger Levsen wrote:
> package: xresprobe
> severity: important
> version: 0.4.23debian1-0.1
>
> Hi,
>
> ddcprobe doesn't detect my 2nd monitor :( Due to #336764 I don't know if this
> is a usage problem or if I should provide more information ;-)
>
> As
Hi,
On Freitag, 2. Oktober 2009, Julien Cristau wrote:
> I don't think ddcprobe can do that, it's pretty much just using a BIOS
> call to get the info, so I'd close this as not a bug. What do you need
> ddcprobe for anyway?
to detect what monitormodell I have :-) http://wiki.debian.org/Kudzu is
Your message dated Thu, 1 Oct 2009 21:20:53 +0200
with message-id <20091001192053.gi20...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#549228: doesnt detect 2nd monitor
has caused the Debian Bug report #549228,
regarding doesnt detect 2nd monitor
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 1.6.4-1
reopen 548716
Why is the patched 1.6.4-2 not built for amd64, only i386 and s390?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Mattia Dongili wrote:
> Could you please see if the suggestions given in
> /usr/share/doc/xserver-xorg-input-synaptics/NEWS.Debian.gz help?
Thanks, it works, but:
- Why it is disabled by default.
The most amazing feature in touchpads is "tap", so why it is disabled?
- Scrooling don't work anymor
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> Package: xserver-xorg-core
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'xserver-xorg-core'
Limit currently set to 'package':'xserver-xorg-core'
> Version: 1.6.4-1
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> reopen
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 00:00:24 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> Why is the patched 1.6.4-2 not built for amd64, only i386 and s390?
>
If you're asking this question, you shouldn't be using debian unstable.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a su
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 548716
Bug#548716: xserver-xorg-core: X server crashes upon startup with SEGV
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug#548724: [xserver-xorg-video-intel] Crashes xserver
Bug#548725: xserver-xorg-core: Afte
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 01:20:41 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> Taking a closer look at the bug report 548716 from Pancho Horrillo shows
> that he has an amd64 box, so this bug should not be closed until 1.6.4-2
> is available for that architecture.
>
That's not how the bts works. Bugs are close
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 00:42 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 00:00:24 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
>
> > Why is the patched 1.6.4-2 not built for amd64, only i386 and s390?
> >
> If you're asking this question, you shouldn't be using debian unstable.
Sorry for raising this
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 01:08 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 00:42 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 00:00:24 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> >
> > > Why is the patched 1.6.4-2 not built for amd64, only i386 and s390?
> > >
> > If you're asking this quest
22 matches
Mail list logo
