Is there anything new about this bug?
People talked about missing window decoration, I more and more feel like
it's caused by the decoration plugin not being loaded by default by
Compiz. See http://bgoglin.livejournal.com/11253.html for some help
about this. Removing the whole compiz config from g
FILES |2 -
INSTALL | 40 +--
Makefile |7 +
README.alps | 20 ++-
alpscomm.c|2 -
debian/changelog |8 ++
debian/control|4 +--
debian/xsfbs/xsfbs.
FILES|2 -
INSTALL | 40 +---
README.alps | 20 ++--
alpscomm.c |2 -
eventcomm.c |2 -
manpages/synaptics.5 | 42 +++---
synaptics.c | 63 +
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8
> reassign 442824 libxrender-dev
Bug#442824: missing #include?
Bug reassigned from package `x11proto-render-dev' to `libxrender-dev'.
> tags 442824 fixed-upstream pending
Bug#442824: m
configure.ac |2 +-
include/X11/extensions/Xrender.h |4 ++--
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 497dda5615d0484d34f3a0a580353ac10ceaced5
Author: Eric Anholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed Sep 5 08:20:33 2007 -0700
Bump version t
ChangeLog| 15 +++
configure| 20 ++--
configure.ac |2 +-
debian/changelog |9 +
debian/control |2 +-
debian/xsfbs/xsfbs.mk| 34
Tag 'libxrender-1_0.9.4-1' created by Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at
2007-09-17 08:03 +
Tagging upload of libxrender 1:0.9.4-1 to unstable.
Changes since libxrender-1_0.9.3-1:
Branden Robinson (1):
Test for existence of debian/patches directory before creating a symlink
to it.
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 08:55:49AM +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
> > > On arm platforms where physical RAM doesn't start at physical address
> > > zero, opening /dev/mem and reading from it causes a kernel oops. This
> > > is arguably a kernel bug, but it's still not a very good idea to just
> > > s
libxrender_0.9.4-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libxrender_0.9.4-1.dsc
libxrender_0.9.4.orig.tar.gz
libxrender_0.9.4-1.diff.gz
libxrender1_0.9.4-1_i386.deb
libxrender1-dbg_0.9.4-1_i386.deb
libxrender-dev_0.9.4-1_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your
Be a supermacho!
Charge your meat for 110% and have a lifetime fiesta with Your chick!
This is the one and only remedy which works flawlessly.
Ask me why? Just because it's the Original thing
You can Order it here: http://clubsolariums.com
P.S.: Guaranteed lightning speed worldwide delivery a
Accepted:
libxrender-dev_0.9.4-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/libx/libxrender/libxrender-dev_0.9.4-1_i386.deb
libxrender1-dbg_0.9.4-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/libx/libxrender/libxrender1-dbg_0.9.4-1_i386.deb
libxrender1_0.9.4-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/libx/libxrender/libxrender1_0.9.4-1_i386.deb
libxren
debian/changelog |6 ++
debian/control |3 ++-
debian/patches/05_build_with_1_4.patch | 22 ++
debian/patches/series |1 +
4 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
New commits:
commit ab5e
Your message dated Mon, 17 Sep 2007 08:47:20 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#442824: fixed in libxrender 1:0.9.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
The problem vanished after I updated my "xserver-xorg*" Packages.
Here is the output of aptitude -F "%p%V" search ~ixorg
xorg 1:7.2-5
xorg-docs 1:1.4-2
xserver-xorg 1:7.3+2
xserver-xorg-core 2:1.4-2
xserver-xorg-input-kbd1:1.2.2-3
xse
On Sun, 2007-09-16 at 12:33 -0400, Alec Robertson wrote:
>
> > You should try removing all these options.
>
> Is there any reason these would cause problems?
Generally, the intention is for the defaults to be safest, and changing
them incurs a certain risk.
> * a recommendation I found somewhe
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.3+2
Severity: important
-- Package-specific info:
Contents of /var/lib/x11/X.roster:
xserver-xorg
/etc/X11/X target unchanged from checksum in /var/lib/x11/X.md5sum.
X server symlink status:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 Aug 28 20:31 /etc/X11/X -> /usr/bin/Xorg
-
Package: xserver-xorg-input-vmmouse
Version: 1:12.4.2-3
Severity: normal
I upgraded xorg today and now vmmouse does not work any longer. The cursor
is located at the lower right corner and does not move. To be more specific,
the visible cursor indeed moves, but any click is reported to the lower
r
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7
> tags 442824 sid
Bug#442824: missing #include?
Tags were: fixed-upstream
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
Attached you can find the Xorg.log with vmmouse enabled. I replaced mouse with
vmmouse in my xorg.conf.
X.Org X Server 1.4.0
Release Date: 5 September 2007
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
Build Operating System: Linux Debian (xorg-server 2:1.4-2)
Current Operating System: Linux ds37 2.6.22-2-68
Vizit mycheapsoft. com ln Internet Xp1orer browser.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
J.J.Green wrote:
> Hi Brice
>
>
>> Any news about this? Did you have a chance to look at where the segfault
>> occurs so that we know whether the bug is in the server or in fluxbox?
>>
>
> I made a fluxbox-dbg and installed xserver-xorg-code-dbg,
> then installed the problematic xserver, ra
Vizit mycheapsoft. com ln Internet Xp1orer browser.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vizit mycheapsoft. com ln Internet Xp1orer browser.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jerry Quinn wrote:
> Brice Goglin wrote:
>> Jerry Quinn wrote:
>>> What's the right place to put this so it will autoload correctly in
>>> the future?
>>
>> /etc/modules should work. But you shouldn't have to do that, it should
>> be done automatically by the system.
>
> Should it be automatic on e
Brice Goglin wrote:
Jerry Quinn wrote:
What's the right place to put this so it will autoload correctly in
the future?
/etc/modules should work. But you shouldn't have to do that, it should
be done automatically by the system.
Should it be automatic on each reboot? Or should the installer h
Hi Brice
> Any news about this? Did you have a chance to look at where the segfault
> occurs so that we know whether the bug is in the server or in fluxbox?
I made a fluxbox-dbg and installed xserver-xorg-code-dbg,
then installed the problematic xserver, ran
startx /usr/bin/xterm
and got an x
Package: xserver-xorg-video-sis
Version: 1:0.9.3-2
Severity: normal
Tried running X on an Intel mini-ITX board with an LCD panel connected.
The panel was detected (however, the X log mentions CRT).
When X started it showed display artifacts - thin vertical stripes where
an incorrect part of the p
Vizit mycheapsoft. com ln Internet Xp1orer browser.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 9/14/07, Nadav Kavalerchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> dynamic clock scaling was disabled. i just gave an example to what causes a
> similar visual effect.
>
> I'm not sure it's dynamic clock because i always had it disabled.
> only, one time when i enabled it, i saw that it gave me a similar v
Hi Michael,
> I'm following up to the bug report, please do so as well.
I'm not sure what this means, but I'm guessing that I didn't cc the
debian bug report system? I have done so this time.
>> Is 64Gb an acceptable amount for a 128Mb ati card on a 1Gb memory
>> system? Aside from compiz, I rea
forcemerge 431746 430819
thank you
J.J.Green wrote:
>> One possible cause for the problem could be that Xserver 1.3 is known to
>> not report Xinerama capabilities correctly, which can confuse clients.
>> If this wrong Xserver behavior causes fluxbox to crash, that would
>> explain the problem.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forcemerge 431746 430819
Bug#431746: Xorg/sparc: Xinerama active, but <= 0 screens?
Bug#430819: fluxbox aborts on upgrade to xserver 1.3
Bug#432256: libxinerama1: XineramaIsActive disagrees with XineramaQueryScreens
on sparc
Forcibly Merged 430819 4317
On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 10:30 -0400, Alec Robertson wrote:
>
> > That wasn't tearing but just a page flipping related bug I fixed for
> > 6.7.19x.
>
> I have re-enabled page flipping and it seems to be better. There is
> still a distortion of my screen when swithcing to/from the virtual
> consoles,
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 09:33 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 10:58:38 +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
>
> > xserver 1.4 (2:1.4-1 from experimental) plus intel 2.1.1-3 fails
> > miserably. The video goes completely dark, both X and vc, and is not
> > restored by returning to vc co
Brice
> You can't run gdb from a terminal in X when debugging something related
> to X.
Silly me, of course
> One possible cause for the problem could be that Xserver 1.3 is known to
> not report Xinerama capabilities correctly, which can confuse clients.
> If this wrong Xserver behavior causes
On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 09:50 -0400, Alec Robertson wrote:
>
> Thanks for the info. A few more questions.
I'm following up to the bug report, please do so as well.
> >> * a recommendation I found somewhere (is this necessary?)
> Option "GARTSize" "64" # default is 8 M
On 15/09/2007, Michal Suchanek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 14/09/2007, Brice Goglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Michal Suchanek wrote:
> > > Detects and throws away part of the information would be more precise.
> > > It gets the sync rates and calculates a mode that fits into these but
> >
xfree86-driver-synaptics_0.14.7~git20070706-1_i386.changes uploaded
successfully to localhost
along with the files:
xfree86-driver-synaptics_0.14.7~git20070706-1.dsc
xfree86-driver-synaptics_0.14.7~git20070706.orig.tar.gz
xfree86-driver-synaptics_0.14.7~git20070706-1.diff.gz
xfree86-driver
xf86-input-evtouch_0.8.7-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
xf86-input-evtouch_0.8.7-2.dsc
xf86-input-evtouch_0.8.7-2.diff.gz
xserver-xorg-input-evtouch_0.8.7-2_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR
On 9/17/07, Michal Suchanek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 15/09/2007, Michal Suchanek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 14/09/2007, Brice Goglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Michal Suchanek wrote:
> > > > Detects and throws away part of the information would be more precise.
> > > > It gets t
Accepted:
xf86-input-evtouch_0.8.7-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/x/xf86-input-evtouch/xf86-input-evtouch_0.8.7-2.diff.gz
xf86-input-evtouch_0.8.7-2.dsc
to pool/main/x/xf86-input-evtouch/xf86-input-evtouch_0.8.7-2.dsc
xserver-xorg-input-evtouch_0.8.7-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xf86-input-evtouch/xser
Accepted:
xfree86-driver-synaptics_0.14.7~git20070706-1.diff.gz
to
pool/main/x/xfree86-driver-synaptics/xfree86-driver-synaptics_0.14.7~git20070706-1.diff.gz
xfree86-driver-synaptics_0.14.7~git20070706-1.dsc
to
pool/main/x/xfree86-driver-synaptics/xfree86-driver-synaptics_0.14.7~git20070706-
On 9/17/07, Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On the bad side though, this session crashes (freezes hard) when logging
> out, closing the sesssion. I think this bug has been reported
> elsewhere.
Isn't this fixed in 2:1.4-2 (the one in unstable)?
Brice
Your message dated Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:02:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#442314: fixed in xfree86-driver-synaptics
0.14.7~git20070706-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Package: x11-common
Version: 1:7.3+2
Hello,
the new X version seems to drop privileges a little too early when it
gets started with -xf86config:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/holbe% X :1 -xf86config xorg-tv.conf -nolisten tcp
|
| Fatal server error:
| Cannot move old log file ("/var/log/Xorg.1.log"
> > I have re-enabled page flipping and it seems to be better. There is
> > still a distortion of my screen when swithcing to/from the virtual
> > consoles, but this generally goes away after a couple of seconds. If
> > not, a restart of compiz will refresh the screen.
>
> What if you just cause
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7
> reassign 442829 libpixman-1-0
Bug#442829: xaa/pixman/composite segfault
Bug reassigned from package `xserver-xorg-core' to `libpixman-1-0'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package x11-common
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: x11-common
> reopen 442879
Bug#442879: x11-common: /usr/bin/X drops privileges too early
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistan
package x11-common
reopen 442879
thanks
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 06:33:32PM +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
> If you look at the beginning of the log, you should see that it didn't
> find the xorg-tv.conf file.
No, I don't. Neither a logfile is moved nor is one written. I don't see
anything.
> This is
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 18:33:32 +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > the new X version seems to drop privileges a little too early when it
> > gets started with -xf86config:
> >
> This is on purpose, for security reasons. Upstream X.org enables the use
Package: xserver-xorg-input-kbd
Version: 1:1.2.2-3
after dist-upgrading today, i realised that the leds of num lock and cups
lock, do not respond, though both of the keys work.
forcemerge 442852 442829
reassign 442852 libpixman-1-0
found 442852 0.9.5-1
forwarded 442852 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12398
thank you
Jan Christoph Nordholz wrote:
> the current experimental version of the X server dies when I start
> a "more complex" client like xdm or enlig
reassign 442887 xserver-xorg-core
found 442887 2:1.4-2
retitle 442887 Xserver 1.4 breaks caps lock and num lock leds
forwarded 442887 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12434
thank you
mikes kikou wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg-input-kbd
>
> Version: 1:1.2.2-3
>
>
> after dist-upgr
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 07:04:20PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> That's not exactly true. Upstream Xorg allows -config/-xf86config for
> non-root with files under /etc/X11/ (given with a relative path), while
> the Debian wrapper drops privileges when these options are used, without
> looking at
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 442887 xserver-xorg-core
Bug#442887: cups lock and num lock leds not responding
Bug reassigned from package `xserver-xorg-input-kbd' to `xserver-xorg-core'.
> found 442887 2:1.4-2
Bug#442887: cups lock and num lock leds not responding
Bug mark
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7
> severity 442879 wishlist
Bug#442879: x11-common: /usr/bin/X drops privileges too early
Severity set to `wishlist' from `normal'
> retitle 442879 x11-common: /usr/bin/X should allow d
Hi,
Is 1.2.99.901-1 or 1.2.99.902-1 generated?
It is remembered that it was between 1.2.99.901-1 and 1.2.99.902-1 that the
condition
from which VT is set to blank screen by my machine began to occur.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
Joerg Platte wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg-input-vmmouse
> Version: 1:12.4.2-3
> Severity: normal
>
> I upgraded xorg today and now vmmouse does not work any longer. The cursor
> is located at the lower right corner and does not move. To be more specific,
> the visible cursor indeed moves, but any
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forcemerge 442852 442829
Bug#442852: xserver-xorg: X doesn't start after todays upgrade
Bug#442829: xaa/pixman/composite segfault
Mismatch - only Bugs in the same package can be forcibly merged:
Bug 442829 is not in the same package as 442852
> reassign
On 17/09/2007, Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/17/07, Michal Suchanek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 15/09/2007, Michal Suchanek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Tried to install the experimental X on a Lenny live CD. Locked up
> > > quite fast. Before I could report I tried
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7
> forcemerge 442852 442829
Bug#442852: xserver-xorg: X doesn't start after todays upgrade
Bug#442829: xaa/pixman/composite segfault
Forcibly Merged 442829 442852.
>
End of message, sto
Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> The problem is not that xdm doesn't check /dev/urandom first, the
> problem is that it reads from /dev/mem _at all_.
>
> It is possible that checking /dev/urandom first masks the problem
> in most configurations, but it doesn't solve it (if you don't have
> /dev/random an
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.3+2
Severity: important
Hi,
I recently upgraded my x.org server in sid, and, after upgrade, the X
server would not work. But this is another issue I will try to
understand at another time.
Anyways, the thing is, since my conf was not working, I wanted to try to
Package: xserver-xorg-video-mga
Version: 1:1.4.7.dfsg.1-3
Severity: normal
Trying to use my configuration from the previous version in unstable
(1.4.6) caused complete failure -- the second head is never even
considered, so I only get single headed operation. Attempting to do
"what xorg 7.3 wants
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 15:17:55 -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> my Xorg.0 log is attached and bzip2d.
>
No it's not. Please resend the log (no need to compress it).
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: xserver-xorg-video-dummy
Version: 1:0.2.0-6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
xserver-xorg-video-dummy still depends merely on xserver-xorg-dev
(>= 2:1.2.99.902); at least on amd64, the autobuilder consequently
wound up building it against xserver 1.3, yielding a bin
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 15:17:55 -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> Section "Device"
> Identifier "Generic Video Card"
> Driver "intel"
> VendorName "Intel Corporation"
> BoardName "82865G Integrated Graphics Controller"
> BusID "PCI:0:2:0"
> EndSe
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 16:12:46 -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> (II) intel(0): Printing probed modes for output VGA
> (II) intel(0): Modeline "1280x1024"x85.0 157.50 1280 1344 1504 1728 1024
> 1027 1028 1072 +hsync +vsync (91.1 kHz)
> (II) intel(0): Modeline "1600x1200"x75.0 204.75 1600 1720
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package pixman
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #442852
# * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12398
# * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
usertags
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 15:17:55 -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:
Section "Device"
Identifier "Generic Video Card"
Driver "intel"
VendorName "Intel Corporation"
BoardName "82865G Integrated Graphics Controller"
Am Montag, 17. September 2007 schrieb Brice Goglin:
Hi Brice,
> There are very few changes between 12.4.0 (you were probably using this
> one earlier) and 12.4.2 (the new broken one). Is there any chance you
> try bissecting the commits in the upstream git repository to find out
> where the breaka
debian/changelog |8
debian/control |4 ++--
debian/copyright |3 +++
3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 8b1387a86681d8e13def5046f40a296c06c340fe
Author: Brice Goglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon Sep 17 23:33:46 2007 +0200
Prepare
Tag 'xserver-xorg-video-dummy-1_0.2.0-7' created by Brice Goglin <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> at 2007-09-17 21:38 +
Tagging upload of xserver-xorg-video-dummy 1:0.2.0-7 to unstable.
Changes since xserver-xorg-video-dummy-1_0.2.0-5:
Branden Robinson (1):
Test for existence of debian/patches dire
xserver-xorg-video-dummy_0.2.0-7_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
xserver-xorg-video-dummy_0.2.0-7.dsc
xserver-xorg-video-dummy_0.2.0-7.diff.gz
xserver-xorg-video-dummy_0.2.0-7_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8
> reassign 442921 libpixman-1-0
Bug#442921: xorg: X crashes on starting most clients
Bug reassigned from package `xorg' to `libpixman-1-0'.
> forcemerge 442829 442921
Bug#442829: xaa/p
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8
> tags 442829 - experimental
Bug#442829: xaa/pixman/composite segfault
Tags were: experimental
Bug#442852: xserver-xorg: X doesn't start after todays upgrade
Bug#442921: xorg: X crashes
Your message dated Mon, 17 Sep 2007 21:47:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#442897: fixed in xserver-xorg-video-dummy 1:0.2.0-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
kls wrote:
> Trying to use my configuration from the previous version in unstable
> (1.4.6) caused complete failure -- the second head is never even
> considered, so I only get single headed operation. Attempting to do
> "what xorg 7.3 wants you to do" doesn't work b/c 1.4.7 doesn't have
> the rele
Your message dated Mon, 17 Sep 2007 18:33:32 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#442879: x11-common: /usr/bin/X drops privileges too early
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Package: xorg
Version: 1:7.3+2
Severity: normal
There were a lot of upgrades of X-related packages today, and since then
I couldn't get gdm to run. After fiddling around I found a lot of
things that didn't run. I narrowed it down somewhat:
$ X 1> output.txt
Works just fine, X starts. After swi
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 16:12:46 -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:
(II) intel(0): Printing probed modes for output VGA
(II) intel(0): Modeline "1280x1024"x85.0 157.50 1280 1344 1504 1728 1024
1027 1028 1072 +hsync +vsync (91.1 kHz)
(II) intel(0): Mode
x11proto-core_7.0.11-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
x11proto-core_7.0.11-1.dsc
x11proto-core_7.0.11.orig.tar.gz
x11proto-core_7.0.11-1.diff.gz
x11proto-core-dev_7.0.11-1_all.deb
x-dev_7.0.11-1_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
Ben Goodrich wrote:
> It is possible that there is some sort of
> conflict with the ability of a Tablet PC to use
> the stylus as a mouse, but I commented out wacom
> in /etc/modules and commented out the stylus and
> eraser-related lines in xorg.conf.
>
> Perhaps there is a larger problem in that
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
x-dev_7.0.11-1_all.deb: package says section is x11, override says libdevel.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and the package wro
Accepted:
x-dev_7.0.11-1_all.deb
to pool/main/x/x11proto-core/x-dev_7.0.11-1_all.deb
x11proto-core-dev_7.0.11-1_all.deb
to pool/main/x/x11proto-core/x11proto-core-dev_7.0.11-1_all.deb
x11proto-core_7.0.11-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/x/x11proto-core/x11proto-core_7.0.11-1.diff.gz
x11proto-core_7.0
Tag 'x11proto-core-7.0.11-1' created by Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at
2007-09-17 22:09 +
Tagging upload of x11proto-core 7.0.11-1 to unstable.
Changes since x11proto-core-7.0.10-2:
Brice Goglin (1):
Various fixed in debian/control and copyright
Colin Harrison (1):
bcopy
.gitignore |8 +
ChangeLog | 65 +
Makefile.in| 95 +++--
XF86keysym.h | 282 ---
Xfuncproto.h.in| 19 +-
Xfuncs.h |4
aclocal.m4 | 194
Accepted:
xserver-xorg-video-dummy_0.2.0-7.diff.gz
to
pool/main/x/xserver-xorg-video-dummy/xserver-xorg-video-dummy_0.2.0-7.diff.gz
xserver-xorg-video-dummy_0.2.0-7.dsc
to pool/main/x/xserver-xorg-video-dummy/xserver-xorg-video-dummy_0.2.0-7.dsc
xserver-xorg-video-dummy_0.2.0-7_i386.deb
to
Package: xserver-xorg-input-mouse
Version: 1:1.2.2-5
Severity: important
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Hello,
Today I updated to the new xserver and xorg in
unstable, but the mouse is not working on my X41
Tablet PC laptop. I can see the pointer, but it does
not move or click. I
.gitignore |8 +
XF86keysym.h| 282
Xfuncproto.h.in | 19 ++-
Xfuncs.h|4
configure.ac|2
keysymdef.h | 12 ++
6 files changed, 183 insertions(+), 144 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 68e841fb4bf4
FYI: The status of the libxrandr source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 2:1.2.1-1
Current version: 2:1.2.2-1
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package xorg-server
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #442887
# * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12434
# * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
use
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 08:19:02AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 00:21:24 +, David Nusinow wrote:
>
> > @@ -114,10 +114,7 @@ Index: xorg-server/hw/xfree86/common/xf86AutoConfig.c
> > +}
> > +len = strlen(direntry->d_name);
> >
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 07:36:18PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg
> Version: 1:7.3+2
> Severity: important
>
> Hi,
>
> I recently upgraded my x.org server in sid, and, after upgrade, the X
> server would not work. But this is another issue I will try to
> understand at another
debian/patches/03_auto_load_driver.diff |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
New commits:
commit cfdc685586d307fe63436aa41ff8dd82f21187c5
Author: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun Sep 16 23:36:31 2007 -0400
Fix addressing thinko in previous cleanup
diff --git
Package: xorg
Version: 7.2-5
Distribution: Debian Lenny (testing)
Kernel: 2.6.22.6
Intel Driver:
ii xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.1.0-2
After running apt-get dist-upgrade and switching my xorg.conf to use "intel"
instead of i810 (which no longer exists) I no longer can run at 1600x12
From: Luke Francis
Chief Executive Officer
Chantex Limited
London
Our ref: CHG/CW/00112/06
I am Luke Francis, Chief Executive Officer
of Chantex Limited. We deal on crude oil, raw materials
and
export to Canada, America, and Europe. Our company is
also
into promotions and entertainme
Package: xkb-data
Version: 1.0~cvs.20070916-1
Severity: normal
clean fails producing the following log:
/usr/share/quilt/pop: line 134: [: too many arguments
Patch resync_rules_base.diff does not remove cleanly (refresh it or enforce
with -f)
--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kerne
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.3+2
Severity: minor
On installing xserver-xorg, I get this message repeatedly:
Preparing to replace xserver-xorg 1:7.2-5 (using
.../xserver-xorg_1%3a7.3+2_all.deb) ...
FATAL: Module battery not found.
This is on a workstation, so no surprise there's no batter
On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 00:11 +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 09:33 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 10:58:38 +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> >
> > > xserver 1.4 (2:1.4-1 from experimental) plus intel 2.1.1-3 fails
> > > miserably. The video goes completely d
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
