Your message dated Tue, 24 Jul 2007 09:17:44 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ping timeout, closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jul 2007 09:17:44 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ping timeout, closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jul 2007 09:17:44 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ping timeout, closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jul 2007 09:17:44 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ping timeout, closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jul 2007 09:17:44 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ping timeout, closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jul 2007 09:17:44 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ping timeout, closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jul 2007 09:20:47 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ping timeout, closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jul 2007 09:17:44 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ping timeout, closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jul 2007 09:17:44 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ping timeout, closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jul 2007 09:17:44 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ping timeout, closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jul 2007 09:17:44 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ping timeout, closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jul 2007 09:17:44 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ping timeout, closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jul 2007 09:17:44 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ping timeout, closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jul 2007 09:24:41 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> submitter 166335 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#166335: xfonts-scalable: proposed XftConfig chunk for when update-xftconfig
becomes available
Changed Bug submitter from Jean-Christophe Dubacq
I just did my last round of close-after-one-month-ping-timeout. So the
major part of the BTS cleaning is now done. I have some statistics about
source/binary packages and bug numbers that have been closed at
http://alioth.debian.org/~bgoglin-guest/XSFBTS/
As of now, there are about 800 bugs remain
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jul 2007 11:10:06 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#257302: xfree86: general complaint about XFree86 on
DellLatitudeD400
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
El martes, 24 de julio de 2007, Brice Goglin escribió:
> I just did my last round of close-after-one-month-ping-timeout. So the
> major part of the BTS cleaning is now done. I have some statistics about
> source/binary packages and bug numbers that have been closed at
> http://alioth.debian.org/~bg
Hi Brice
Before I reassign to fluxbox, please try
startx /usr/bin/xterm
then run fluxbox from the xterm in there and tell us what happens. If
the problem is only fluxbox related, you should get your X and xterm
back after fluxbox exited on startup.
Looks like it is: fluxbox fails to start w
J.J.Green wrote:
> Hi Brice
>
>> Before I reassign to fluxbox, please try
>>startx /usr/bin/xterm
>> then run fluxbox from the xterm in there and tell us what happens. If
>> the problem is only fluxbox related, you should get your X and xterm
>> back after fluxbox exited on startup.
>
> Looks l
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:47:06 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#250999: xserver-xfree86: TrueType font paths missing from
default XF86Config-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> reassign 264209 xserver-xorg-video-ati
Bug#264209: xserver-xfree86: [radeon] I wish to swap primary and secondary head
on Radeon card
Bug reassigned from package `xserver-xfree86' to
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jul 2007 13:06:56 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#273571: xserver-xfree86: lacks modelines for 16:10 modes
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jul 2007 13:10:27 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#279270: xserver-xfree86: Two mouse devise sections cause
double speed in kernel 2.6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> reassign 289328 xserver-xorg-video-tdfx
Bug#289328: xserver-xfree86: [tdfx] want config option to let Voodoo Banshee
users live dangerously, enabling DRI at large root window resolut
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jul 2007 13:19:53 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#281286: xserver-xfree86: Starting X with USB mouse
unpluged hardlocks system when Option "AGPMode" "4" used.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jul 2007 13:27:56 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#291903: xserver-xfree86: New mode for fujitsu and sceptre
displays
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jul 2007 13:31:56 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#292411: xserver-xfree86: [debconf] want dual head config
in ati radeon 7500
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jul 2007 13:36:49 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#295530: [siliconmotion] Corrupted display on external
monitor if external res > built-in res
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 11:57:33 +0200, Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:
> > You mentioned that you reproduced this bug a couple month ago. But, were
> > you using Xorg/Etch at this point? If not, could you try?
>
> Hi Brice,
>
> I am sorry, all the Debian systems around here at the university that I
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 04:28:51PM +0200, Dirk Van Hertem wrote:
Thomas Dickey wrote:
Well, the sometimes should be rather "with some programs". E.g. when
starting bitchx, man, mutt... it *always* kills the terminal. When using
other applications: emacs, gv, ls, xt
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> reassign 301450 xserver-xorg-core
Bug#301450: xserver-xfree86: Can't open apm_bios device when using devfs device
naming rules
Bug reassigned from package `xserver-xfree86' to `xserv
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 10:16:17 +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 02:18:33AM +0100, Brice Goglin wrote:
>
> > Did you have a chance to try to reproduce this bug?
>
> Not yet. I have the machine but need to go and buy a keyboard for it
> before I can do anything constructive wi
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 22:31:49 -0800, Jason Self wrote:
> On 1/17/07, Brice Goglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi Jason,
>>
>> Did you manage to get X back to work since you reported this bug 4 month
>> ago? You could eventually try Xorg 7.1 currently in testing. But it is
>> strange that this
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 12:09:41 +0100, Brice Goglin wrote:
> I don't think adding a pre-depend on awk is a good idea. awk is
> essential. I would rather have apt make sure that nothing happends
> between mawk is removed and gawk is installed.
>
Shouldn't this bug be reassigned to apt then?
Or, i
tags 242216 - patch
reassign 242216 xserver-xorg
kthxbye
On Thu, Apr 8, 2004 at 11:29:46 +0400, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> > > Could you please explain what you mean?
> >
> > Sure.
> > ...
> > I am referring to the large case statement at line 990 of
> > xserver-xfree86.config.in[1].
> >
> >
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 242216 - patch
Bug#242216: xserver-xfree86: [debconf] monitor selection method defaults to
advanced in too many siutations
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: patch
> reassign 242216 xserver-xorg
Bug#242216: xserver-xfree86: [debconf] monitor selectio
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 12:30:08AM +0200, Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2007, Yann Vernier wrote:
> > to codes that never occur. I added similar lines to evdev:
> > // Fake keycodes for virtual keys
> > = 241;
> > = 242;
> > = 243;
> > = 24
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 01:43:46PM +0200, Dirk Van Hertem wrote:
> You can disregard my comments. Today everything works fine (I have no
> idea why)... Maybe a package that was not yet fully installed.
>
> My apologies for the inconvenience.
no problem
(if there's something we can reproduce, t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> tags 432613 + patch
Bug#432613: xkb-data: virtual keys missing from evdev keycodes, breaks modifiers
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing h
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jul 2007 14:20:32 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#182976: xserver-xfree86: more information in debconf about
possible problems with framebuffer
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 185584 xserver-xorg-core
Bug#185584: xserver-xfree86: X server should retry xfs connection
Bug reassigned from package `xserver-xfree86' to `xserver-xorg-core'.
> kthxbye
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
De
reassign 185584 xserver-xorg-core
kthxbye
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 22:05:04 +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Package: xserver-xfree86
> Version: 4.2.1-3
> Severity: wishlist
>
> If you configure X to use a font server via TCP:
>
> FontPath "tcp/font:7100"
>
> and then restart the font server,
> On Sat, Mar 1, 2003 at 15:08:40 +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
>> On Sam, 2003-03-01 at 13:10, Marco Herrn wrote:
>> > The error message from the X server is not
>> > very verbose:
>> >
>> >EE) Screen(s) found, but none have a usable configuration.
>> >
>> >Fatal server error:
>> >no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 182976
Bug#182976: xserver-xfree86: [core server] hack server to tell people 'no
screens found' can be due to 'UseFBDev' option
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> tags 182976 wontfix
Bug#182976: xserver-xfree86: [core server] hack server t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 182976 xserver-xorg-core
Bug#182976: xserver-xfree86: [core server] hack server to tell people 'no
screens found' can be due to 'UseFBDev' option
Bug reassigned from package `xserver-xfree86' to `xserver-xorg-core'.
> stop
Stopping processing
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> reassign 182976 xserver-xorg-core
Bug#182976: xserver-xfree86: [core server] hack server to tell people 'no
screens found' can be due to 'UseFBDev' option
Bug reassigned from package
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 261088
Bug#261088: xlibs: add thinkpad model with support for Forward and Backward keys
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> found 261088 1.0~cvs.20070721-1
Bug#261088: xlibs: add thinkpad model with support for Forward and Backward keys
Bug
reopen 261088
found 261088 1.0~cvs.20070721-1
quit
I don't see any thinkpad stuff in /etc/X11/xkb/symbols/inet .
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 261088 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5697
Bug#261088: xlibs: add thinkpad model with support for Forward and Backward keys
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5697.
forwarded 261088 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5697
quit
Similar bug upstream.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
xfonts-100dpi_1.0.0-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
xfonts-100dpi_1.0.0-4.dsc
xfonts-100dpi_1.0.0-4.diff.gz
xfonts-100dpi_1.0.0-4_all.deb
xfonts-100dpi-transcoded_1.0.0-4_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
Tag 'xfonts-100dpi-1_1.0.0-4' created by Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at
2007-07-24 17:00 +
Tagging upload of xfonts-100dpi 1:1.0.0-4 to unstable.
Changes since the dawn of time:
Branden Robinson (4):
Set svn:keywords property to "Id" (keyword already present).
Note probabl
debian/changelog |8
debian/control |2
debian/copyright |4
debian/xsfbs/xsfbs-autoreconf.mk | 150 ++
debian/xsfbs/xsfbs.mk| 388
debian/xsfbs/xsfbs.sh| 907 ++
Tag 'xfonts-75dpi-1_1.0.0-4' created by Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at
2007-07-24 17:02 +
Tagging upload of xfonts-75dpi 1:1.0.0-4 to unstable.
Changes since the dawn of time:
Branden Robinson (4):
Set svn:keywords property to "Id" (keyword already present).
Note probable
debian/changelog |8
debian/control |2
debian/copyright |4
debian/xsfbs/xsfbs-autoreconf.mk | 150 ++
debian/xsfbs/xsfbs.mk| 388
debian/xsfbs/xsfbs.sh| 907 ++
Accepted:
xfonts-100dpi-transcoded_1.0.0-4_all.deb
to pool/main/x/xfonts-100dpi/xfonts-100dpi-transcoded_1.0.0-4_all.deb
xfonts-100dpi_1.0.0-4.diff.gz
to pool/main/x/xfonts-100dpi/xfonts-100dpi_1.0.0-4.diff.gz
xfonts-100dpi_1.0.0-4.dsc
to pool/main/x/xfonts-100dpi/xfonts-100dpi_1.0.0-4.dsc
x
xfonts-75dpi_1.0.0-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
xfonts-75dpi_1.0.0-4.dsc
xfonts-75dpi_1.0.0-4.diff.gz
xfonts-75dpi_1.0.0-4_all.deb
xfonts-75dpi-transcoded_1.0.0-4_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jul 2007 17:02:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#434286: fixed in xfonts-100dpi 1:1.0.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
debian/changelog | 10 --
debian/control|2 +-
debian/copyright |2 +-
debian/xsfbs/xsfbs.mk | 27 ++-
4 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 36e656e5b4c158b036a18a962322fb4abb208c13
Author: Julien Crist
Tag 'xfonts-base-1_1.0.0-5' created by Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at
2007-07-24 17:20 +
Tagging upload of xfonts-base 1:1.0.0-5 to unstable.
Changes since the dawn of time:
Branden Robinson (11):
Set svn:keywords property to "Id" (keyword already present).
Note probable o
Accepted:
xfonts-75dpi-transcoded_1.0.0-4_all.deb
to pool/main/x/xfonts-75dpi/xfonts-75dpi-transcoded_1.0.0-4_all.deb
xfonts-75dpi_1.0.0-4.diff.gz
to pool/main/x/xfonts-75dpi/xfonts-75dpi_1.0.0-4.diff.gz
xfonts-75dpi_1.0.0-4.dsc
to pool/main/x/xfonts-75dpi/xfonts-75dpi_1.0.0-4.dsc
xfonts-75d
Package: compiz-kde
Version: 0.5.0.dfsg-2
Severity: normal
compiz-kde: when starting compiz, the screen goes totally white only the
borders(!) of the alt-tab window are visible and the icons of that one
i used compiz --replace and tried compiz --replace --indirect-rendering
as well
using a GeForc
xfonts-base_1.0.0-5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
xfonts-base_1.0.0-5.dsc
xfonts-base_1.0.0-5.diff.gz
xfonts-base_1.0.0-5_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscri
Tag 'xfonts-cyrillic-1_1.0.0-5' created by Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
at 2007-07-24 17:31 +
Tagging upload of xfonts-cyrillic 1:1.0.0-5 to unstable.
Changes since the dawn of time:
Branden Robinson (4):
Set svn:keywords property to "Id" (keyword already present).
Note pro
debian/changelog |7
debian/control |2
debian/copyright |4
debian/xsfbs/xsfbs-autoreconf.mk | 150 ++
debian/xsfbs/xsfbs.mk| 388
debian/xsfbs/xsfbs.sh| 907 ++
Accepted:
xfonts-base_1.0.0-5.diff.gz
to pool/main/x/xfonts-base/xfonts-base_1.0.0-5.diff.gz
xfonts-base_1.0.0-5.dsc
to pool/main/x/xfonts-base/xfonts-base_1.0.0-5.dsc
xfonts-base_1.0.0-5_all.deb
to pool/main/x/xfonts-base/xfonts-base_1.0.0-5_all.deb
Override entries for your package:
xfon
xfonts-cyrillic_1.0.0-5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
xfonts-cyrillic_1.0.0-5.dsc
xfonts-cyrillic_1.0.0-5.diff.gz
xfonts-cyrillic_1.0.0-5_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
Folkert van Heusden wrote:
> Package: compiz-kde
> Version: 0.5.0.dfsg-2
> Severity: normal
>
>
> compiz-kde: when starting compiz, the screen goes totally white only the
> borders(!) of the alt-tab window are visible and the icons of that one
> i used compiz --replace and tried compiz --replace --
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jul 2007 17:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#434288: fixed in xfonts-base 1:1.0.0-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Accepted:
xfonts-cyrillic_1.0.0-5.diff.gz
to pool/main/x/xfonts-cyrillic/xfonts-cyrillic_1.0.0-5.diff.gz
xfonts-cyrillic_1.0.0-5.dsc
to pool/main/x/xfonts-cyrillic/xfonts-cyrillic_1.0.0-5.dsc
xfonts-cyrillic_1.0.0-5_all.deb
to pool/main/x/xfonts-cyrillic/xfonts-cyrillic_1.0.0-5_all.deb
Ove
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 05:39:04PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> xfonts-base (1:1.0.0-5) unstable; urgency=low
> .
>[ Branden Robinson ]
>* Update package description.
> + Stop claiming that the package also provides font file manipulation
>utilities. It no long
> > Package: compiz-kde
> > Version: 0.5.0.dfsg-2
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > compiz-kde: when starting compiz, the screen goes totally white only the
> > borders(!) of the alt-tab window are visible and the icons of that one
> > i used compiz --replace and tried compiz --replace --indirect-render
Have you ever hoped to have a high dollar Watch?
We have the problem solved for you!
We provide all the big names
for a low fraction of the expense.
www.wehequis.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 19:45:47 +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> It would be good if someone also addressed the description problems I
> mentioned in my mail to debian-x the other day - particularly this
> paragraph which still exists in 1.0.0-5:
>
> This package contains primarily fonts in the ISO
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jul 2007 17:17:13 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#434287: fixed in xfonts-75dpi 1:1.0.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Hello, Brice,
I did reply to your ping. But it seems that this bug is n-plicated. The last
stage of things is here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=425882
so the bug is not solved yet.
Maybe you are not paying too much attention here because 425882 is against
the obsolete xser
debian/changelog| 11 +++
debian/control |2 +-
debian/copyright|3 +++
debian/rules|2 --
debian/xfonts-encodings.install |1 -
debian/xfonts-encodings.links |2 --
debian/xfonts-encodings.lintian
debian/changelog |8
debian/control |5 -
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 14d45b1c1de7641fbb1e76d7e4aa3b572ab565bf
Author: Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue Jul 24 20:00:06 2007 +0200
Drop paragraph about xfonts-base-tr
Package: compiz
Version: 0.5.0.dfsg-2
Severity: normal
Hi,
It seems that the most functionality of compiz doesn't work.
Only the fancy alt+tab works but that's it.
Dragging de desktop (ctrl+alt & move mouse), the cube, the wobbling
windows, nothing. Also kde-window-decorator fail but for that is
Package: compiz-gtk
Version: 0.5.0.dfsg-2
Severity: normal
compiz-gtk: needs clearlook theme but is not included
Window manager warning: Failed to load theme "Clearlooks": Failed to
find a valid file for theme Clearlooks
according to apt-cache search clear one needs:
kde-style-klearlook - Clone
debian/changelog | 14
debian/patches/05_module_defaults.diff | 25
debian/patches/07_stolen_from_HEAD_xorgconf_manpage.diff | 2299 +++
debian/patches/07_xorgconf_manpage_overhaul.diff | 2213 --
debia
Tag 'xfonts-encodings-1_1.0.2-2' created by Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
at 2007-07-24 19:48 +
Tagging upload of xfonts-encodings 1:1.0.2-2 to unstable.
Changes since xfonts-encodings-1_1.0.2-1:
Brice Goglin (3):
Fix displaying of patches applied by quilt.
Minor fixes in th
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 01:48:30PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> any news on this bug? I'm trying to close or reassign bugs filed
> against xserver-xfree86 before removing the package from unstable.
Not yet, sorry. I still haven't bought an extra keyboard.
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell
xfonts-encodings_1.0.2-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
xfonts-encodings_1.0.2-2.dsc
xfonts-encodings_1.0.2-2.diff.gz
xfonts-encodings_1.0.2-2_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a s
David wrote:
> I did reply to your ping.
I closed the bug because I didn't see any reply in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=425451
Maybe your replied to me without keeping the bug in CC and I missed your
mail, sorry if this is the case.
> But it seems that this bug is n-plicated.
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jul 2007 22:18:00 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#434539: compiz doesn't work at all, only fancy alt+tab
functionality
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Folkert van Heusden wrote:
> Package: compiz-gtk
> Version: 0.5.0.dfsg-2
> Severity: normal
>
>
> compiz-gtk: needs clearlook theme but is not included
>
> Window manager warning: Failed to load theme "Clearlooks": Failed to
> find a valid file for theme Clearlooks
>
> according to apt-cache search
Accepted:
xfonts-encodings_1.0.2-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/x/xfonts-encodings/xfonts-encodings_1.0.2-2.diff.gz
xfonts-encodings_1.0.2-2.dsc
to pool/main/x/xfonts-encodings/xfonts-encodings_1.0.2-2.dsc
xfonts-encodings_1.0.2-2_all.deb
to pool/main/x/xfonts-encodings/xfonts-encodings_1.0.2-2_all.
> > compiz-gtk: needs clearlook theme but is not included
> > Window manager warning: Failed to load theme "Clearlooks": Failed to
> > find a valid file for theme Clearlooks
> > according to apt-cache search clear one needs:
> > kde-style-klearlook - Clone of GNOME's Clearlooks theme for KDE
> > no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> notfound 403822 2:1.2.0-2
Bug#403822: xserver-xorg-core: repeating keystrokes on time skew
Bug marked as not found in version 2:1.2.0-2.
(By the way, this Bug is currently marked as d
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:48:21 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#434290: fixed in xfonts-encodings 1:1.0.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Your message dated Tue, 24 Jul 2007 23:07:57 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#434545: compiz-gtk: needs clearlook theme but is not
included also windows miss borders and cannot be moved/resized by this
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as don
Folkert van Heusden wrote:
>>> Package: compiz-kde
>>> Version: 0.5.0.dfsg-2
>>> Severity: normal
>>>
>>> compiz-kde: when starting compiz, the screen goes totally white only the
>>> borders(!) of the alt-tab window are visible and the icons of that one
>>> i used compiz --replace and tried compiz
> >> I guess you are using the nvidia binary driver, right? We had several
> >> bug reports about compiz on nvidia recently, do you have another machine
> >> with another vendor's graphic board and a free 3D driver to try to
> >> reproduce without nvidia-glx?
> >
> > I tried it initially without th
Folkert van Heusden wrote:
> I should've written that I already fixed it half an hour ago, sorry for
> that. It seems I needed to use the binary nvidia driver instead of the
> 'nv' one.
>
Do you mean the original bug is fixed when using nvidia-glx? No while
screen anymore?
The nv driver cannot
Thank you for your very kind reply. So, maybe you would like to forward the
bug 425882 to the latest version of the package?
On 24/07/07, Brice Goglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
David wrote:
> I did reply to your ping.
I closed the bug because I didn't see any reply in
http://bugs.debian.org/c
tags 432064 +fixed-upstream
thank you
Thanks, committed in upstream git
http://gitweb.freedesktop.org/?p=xorg/driver/xf86-video-via.git;a=commitdiff;h=cbe2b78e671133c5808fc339cbfdb5f1a87da1dc
I'll take care of all your other reports like this one in the near future.
Brice
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 432064 +fixed-upstream
Bug#432064: 'man via' typos: "downlads" & s/it's/its/
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed-upstream
> thank you
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
On Fri, May 4, 2007 at 19:27:03 +0100, Robert de Bath wrote:
> Well, looks like I was wrong, the current unstable (1:7.2-3) locks up
> with 100% cpu. The process can be kill -9'd and the attached log is what
> remains. In addition after resetting the console I can see the messages:
>
> " f000:505
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
