Please send us the output of
/usr/share/bug/xserver-xorg/script 3>&1
Brice
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've experienced this very same problem in my laptop, twice in the last two
hours.
I'm running X from unstable, with the free radeon driver. My card is:
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon Mobility M7 LW
[Radeon Mobility 7500]
Best regards
--
Isaac Clerencia at Warp
> What about xserver-xorg-video-nv? You said you were able to reproduce
> the lockup with this driver in unstable? If you can't anymore with
I do not have the nvidia card any more, so i can't test.
> But, note that we won't be able to actually help you with fglrx or
> nvidia since those are clos
Pulling xserver-xorg-video-ati 6.6.3-5 and deps from experimental, in
combination with linux-image-2.6.18-4-amd64 2.6.18.dfsg.1-12... this problem
is now resolved for me.
Feel free to close this bug once fresher bits hit unstable.
Bdale
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a sub
Package: xorg
Version: 1:7.1.0-16
Well, not really a bug, but rather a missing safety net for
third-party software not designed for the new directory structure.
The present case concerns a high-level commercial program for data
handling and analysis. Other programs may, however, be equally
El Martes, 17 de Abril de 2007, Andreas Höschler escribió:
> Hi,
>
> I installed the xserver-xorg-input-elographics package and it seems to
> work. I can move the mouse by touching the display. However, some
> calibration seems to be needed. Touching the display does not move the
> mouse under my f
Am 2007-04-07 20:45:30, schrieb Russell Coker:
> On Saturday 07 April 2007 17:46, Brice Goglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > Also xutils-dev should probably depend on xutils.
> >
> > Why?
>
> It's what most packages do. Generally you don't want to develop something
> unless you can also us
Am 2007-04-09 18:52:39, schrieb Brice Goglin:
> Hi,
>
> About 9 years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding
> editres displaying some junk within a very big widget tree. Did you
> reproduce this problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? If not, I will close
> this bug in the next weeks.
The
Am 2007-04-09 16:25:25, schrieb Brice Goglin:
> Hi,
>
> About 4 years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding xwd
> locking another display when killed with ctrl-c. I can't reproduce here.
> Did you reproduce this problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? If not, I will
> close this bug in the
Am 2007-04-09 18:54:06, schrieb Brice Goglin:
> Hi,
>
> About 9 years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding xset
> -q falsely assuming that the XFree86-Misc extension is present. Did you
> reproduce this problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? If not, I will close
> this bug in the next we
Am 2007-04-09 17:14:11, schrieb Brice Goglin:
> Hi,
>
> About 6 years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding
> xmessage problems with its widget hierarchy. You provided a sort of
Since I am localizeing and themeing nearly ALL "xbase-clients"
and others using Xresources I have never e
Am 2007-04-09 20:07:03, schrieb Brice Goglin:
> Hi,
>
> About 6 years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding xmag
> crashing in XGetImage. Did you reproduce this problem recently? With
> Xorg/Etch? If not, I will close this bug in the next weeks.
I have never encountered this Bug in
Am 2007-04-09 19:54:53, schrieb Brice Goglin:
> Hi,
>
> About 7 years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding xwd
> dumping the wrong window. Did you reproduce this problem recently? With
> Xorg/Etch? If not, I will close this bug in the next weeks.
I have never had this bug since Woo
Hello Brice,
Am 2007-04-09 15:43:05, schrieb Brice Goglin:
> Hi,
>
> About 5 years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding
> apropos not working, and you said last year that it was still not
> working, even if Denis couldn't reproduce the problem. Did you
> reproduce? With Xorg/Etch?
Am 2007-04-09 16:18:29, schrieb Brice Goglin:
> Hi,
>
> About 4 years ago, you reported (or replied to) a bug in the Debian BTS
> regarding a buffer overflow in MANPATH handling causing xman to
> segfault. Did any of you guys reproduce this problem recently? With
> Xorg/Etch? If not, I will close
Am 2007-04-10 18:11:17, schrieb Julien Cristau:
> /etc/X11/Xsession is a conffile, so modifying it to suit your needs
> locally is just fine. I don't think it's worth it to apply this patch
> in Debian, though. If other XSF members disagree, they should feel free
> to remove the wontfix tag.
But
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2
> reassign 419907 x11-common
Bug#419907: Note on xorg
Bug reassigned from package `xorg' to `x11-common'.
> severity 419907 wishlist
Bug#419907: Note on xorg
Severity set to `wishlist'
Your message dated Thu, 19 Apr 2007 00:10:50 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318849: XFree86 random crash
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Package: xserver-xorg-video-vesa
Version: 1:1.3.0-1
When I run `xset dpms force ???', where ??? is standby, suspend, off, or
on, nothing happens. Here's the lines from /var/log/Xorg.0.log that
contain "DPMS":
> (II) Loading extension DPMS
> (II) VESA(0): No DPMS capabilities specified; RGB/Col
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 10:25:29AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-04-15 at 17:11 +, David Nusinow wrote:
> >
> > commit 7901afcce99a8af97e560d34e3685fd55eaa9c1a
> > Author: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Sun Apr 15 13:11:06 2007 -0400
> >
> > * Add myself to upl
debian/changelog|7 +++
debian/libdrm2.NEWS |8
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
New commits:
commit 851a9fd0e56d4bba68aba0073ef7017f79156e76
Author: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed Apr 18 22:50:39 2007 -0400
* Add NEWS.Debian explaining the change in
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 2:1.1.1-21
Followup-For: Bug #414782
Upon doing an Apt-get dist-upgrade of Etch and updating Nvidia Drivers Xorg
will load but will not
show any screen.
(WW) NVIDIA(0): Unable to load "xf86ExecX86int10".
(EE) NVIDIA(0): Unable to initialize the X Int10 modul
.gitignore| 22
COPYING | 26
Makefile.am | 12
Makefile.in | 20
README.G80| 16
aclocal.m4| 147 +++-
autogen.sh| 12
config.h.in | 24
configure | 1607 +++--
COPYING | 26 +
Makefile.am |2
README.G80| 16
configure.ac | 16
man/Makefile.am |9
man/nv.man| 80 ++--
src/Makefile.am | 24 +
src/g80_cursor.c | 185 ++
src/g80_cursor.h |3
src/g80_ddc.c | 230 +
Tag 'nv-1.99.1' created by Aaron Plattner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at 2007-03-09
02:43 +
Add G80 support. Version 2.0rc1.
Changes since nv-1.2.2.1:
Aaron Plattner (3):
Remove the riva128 submodule. Link Riva support into nv_drv.so directly.
Initial G80 support. Bump to 1.99.1.
Tag 'nv-2.0.0' created by Aaron Plattner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at 2007-03-19
03:54 +
G80 support, bug fixes
Changes since nv-1.99.1:
Aaron Plattner (7):
Use DAC load detection to decide which OR to use instead of trusting the
EDID.
Get rid of non-portable := assignments.
Fix
Tag 'nv-2.0.1' created by Aaron Plattner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at 2007-03-27
23:02 +
Fix a modeswitching hang on pre-G80.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBGCaKM9WrMjwm6ljURAoGRAKD/KwVAKLhOaS71hC4M2QZbPM2UPQCdHJ/Z
Isttrgm/WfzroMABo/PjFQE=
=IWs7
-END PGP
Tag 'nv-2.0.2' created by Aaron Plattner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at 2007-04-17
22:05 +
New products, bug fix
Changes since nv-2.0.1:
Aaron Plattner (4):
Remove extraneous DisplayModeRec allocation.
Add GeForce 8600 and 8500 PCI IDs.
G80: Add a basic README.
Bump to 2.0.2.
Tag 'xserver-xorg-video-nv-1_2.0.2-1' created by David Nusinow <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> at 2007-04-19 03:33 +
Tagging upload of xserver-xorg-video-nv-1_2.0.2-1 to unstable.
Changes since nv-2.0.2:
Branden Robinson (3):
Set svn:keywords property to "Id" (keyword already present).
Note
29 matches
Mail list logo
