Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> # two different reports here
> clone 407055 -1
Bug#407055: compiz: manages only screen 0 of a multi screen display
Bug 407055 cloned as bug 414987.
> reassign 407055 compiz 0.2.2-1
B
I tried removing 42_build_int10_submodules.diff from the patches and rebuild
everything but I still had the same problem. Was there more to revert than just
taking out this patch? I would be happy to test this if I could revert it back
all the way.
Best Regards.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E
Package: xserver-xorg-video-i810
Version: 2:1.7.2-4
Followup-For: Bug #412275
Hello,
Since a recent update of xorg into Etch I have noticed a similar problem
(without harmful consequences) that I never have before.
Now when I ajust the time (increase or decrease) via the configuration
box of K
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 03:58:49 -0700, C.Y.M wrote:
> I tried removing 42_build_int10_submodules.diff from the patches and rebuild
> everything but I still had the same problem. Was there more to revert
> than just taking out this patch? I would be happy to test this if I
> could revert it back
configure.ac |2
src/common.h |1
src/i830.h |1
src/i830_debug.c | 13 ++
src/i830_display.c | 103 +--
src/i830_dri.c | 10
src/i830_i2c.c |1
src/i830_lvds.c |8
debian/rules | 10 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 33bce0cd304b9b4b2d9da50133aa9109cae940fd
Author: Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu Mar 15 15:35:31 2007 +0100
Don't install files executable if they don't need to be.
Also re
Tag 'xorg-server-2_1.2.99.902-1' created by Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
at 2007-03-15 15:27 +
Tagging upload of xorg-server 2:1.2.99.902-1 to experimental.
Changes since xorg-server-2_1.2.99.901-1:
Brice Goglin:
* Apply patch from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to our xvfb-run wrapper
Drew
I'm following up to a very old debian-x message which I found on google
when my sarge install baffled me by demanding to know my video card's
PCI address. Branden's explanation immediately got me going again,
but since he asks for suggestions to avoid this problem which bothered
me the same way i
Package: xserver-xephyr
Version: 2:1.1.1-20
Severity: normal
Hi,
When using Xephyr, the Caps Lock key does "lock" the shift, but does
not unlock it when pressing for the second time.
This happens in both the testing and unstable versions.
I tried to reproduce it by using no window manager inst
xorg-server_1.2.99.902-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
xorg-server_1.2.99.902-1.dsc
xorg-server_1.2.99.902.orig.tar.gz
xorg-server_1.2.99.902-1.diff.gz
xprint-common_1.2.99.902-1_all.deb
xserver-xorg-core_1.2.99.902-1_i386.deb
xserver-xorg-dev_1.2
xserver-xorg-video-intel_1.9.92-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
xserver-xorg-video-intel_1.9.92-1.dsc
xserver-xorg-video-intel_1.9.92.orig.tar.gz
xserver-xorg-video-intel_1.9.92-1.diff.gz
xserver-xorg-video-intel_1.9.92-1_i386.deb
xserver-xorg-vide
Tag 'xserver-xorg-video-intel-2_1.9.92-1' created by Julien Cristau <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> at 2007-03-15 16:07 +
Tagging upload of xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:1.9.92-1 to experimental.
Changes since xserver-xorg-video-intel-2_1.9.91-2:
Alan Hourihane:
Add some additional checks when XAA is
Accepted:
xdmx-tools_1.2.99.902-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xorg-server/xdmx-tools_1.2.99.902-1_i386.deb
xdmx_1.2.99.902-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xorg-server/xdmx_1.2.99.902-1_i386.deb
xnest_1.2.99.902-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xorg-server/xnest_1.2.99.902-1_i386.deb
xorg-server_1.2.99.902-1.
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
xserver-xorg-video-i810_1.9.92-1_all.deb: package says section is oldlibs,
override says x11.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct a
Accepted:
xserver-xorg-video-i810_1.9.92-1_all.deb
to
pool/main/x/xserver-xorg-video-intel/xserver-xorg-video-i810_1.9.92-1_all.deb
xserver-xorg-video-intel_1.9.92-1.diff.gz
to
pool/main/x/xserver-xorg-video-intel/xserver-xorg-video-intel_1.9.92-1.diff.gz
xserver-xorg-video-intel_1.9.92-1.ds
Your message dated Thu, 15 Mar 2007 16:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#410879: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.2.99.902-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Your message dated Thu, 15 Mar 2007 16:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#351042: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.2.99.902-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Your message dated Thu, 15 Mar 2007 16:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#410879: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.2.99.902-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 415025 confirmed
Bug#415025: xserver-xephyr: caps lock does not work correctly in Xephyr
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed
> found 415025 2:1.2.99.902-1
Bug#415025: xserver-xephyr: caps lock does not work correctly in Xephyr
Bug marked
tags 415025 confirmed
found 415025 2:1.2.99.902-1
thanks
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 17:10:22 +0100, Jochem Berndsen wrote:
> When using Xephyr, the Caps Lock key does "lock" the shift, but does
> not unlock it when pressing for the second time.
>
> This happens in both the testing and unstable vers
> Jeroen N. Witmond wrote:
> Is the X process consuming lots of CPU when the freeze occur?
>
I don't know. I have no access to the system when X freezes.
>>> can you setup sshd so you can login from another machine when the
>>> interface freezes?
>>>
>>
>> What do I look for? CPU
Hi,
> Since upgrading to the experimental version of the intel driver, my
> screen remains dark after starting. Neither gdm nor startx brings any
> content on the screen. Backlight is on, but no pixels.
I noticed the following:
downgrading to the previous driver version works, BUT if I switch to t
Hi,
I forgot to forward this to the bug, but the reason I reopened it is:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=413040;msg=59
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 06:03:37PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> thanks for your report, I can reproduce this behaviour. Would you mind
> reporting this problem upstream at http://bugs.freedesktop.org/ ?
I've reported the bug there. For your reference:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 415025 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10313
Bug#415025: xserver-xephyr: caps lock does not work correctly in Xephyr
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10313.
> kthxb
forwarded 415025 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10313
kthxbye
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 00:50:55 +0100, Jochem Berndsen wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 06:03:37PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > thanks for your report, I can reproduce this behaviour. Would you mind
> > reporting th
Hi,
Apparently there is an issue with the intel modesetting driver and
certain LVDS panel resolutions.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9076
has the same symptoms as I had, and getting the current Debian package
source from experimental and changing the value of
I9XX_P2_LVDS_SLOW_LIMIT
reassign 368165 libxau-dev
close 368165 1:1.0.0-4
thanks
Hi,
this bug was fixed last august, but never properly closed. I'm doing so
with this message. For reference, the relevant changelog entry is
included below:
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 14:18:07 -0700, Denis Barbier wrote:
> libxau (1:1.0.
Your message dated Fri, 16 Mar 2007 03:19:51 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in NMU of compiz 0.2.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Your message dated Fri, 16 Mar 2007 03:19:51 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in NMU of compiz 0.2.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> # provided patch doesn't seem to fix the issue completely
> tags 414046 - patch
Bug#414046: libX11: Buffer overflow in XGetPixel().
Tags were: security patch
Tags removed: patch
>
En
debian/changelog | 16 +++-
debian/scripts/vars.kfreebsd-amd64 |9 +
debian/scripts/vars.kfreebsd-i386 | 10 ++
3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
New commits:
commit fe5a6822c22760c3dcf3843efd930850f9460a0e
Author: Julien Crist
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> tags 363910 pending
Bug#363910: xorg: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD (missing vars.kfreebsd-i386 and
vars.kfreebsd-amd64)
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping proc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 368165 libxau-dev
Bug#368165: man-db in cron.daily returns errors and warnings
Bug#378828: xlibs-static-dev: Man pages point to non-existing man3x directory
Bug reassigned from package `xorg' to `libxau-dev'.
> close 368165 1:1.0.0-4
Bug#36816
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> forwarded 415061 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9076
Bug#415061: xserver-xorg-video-i810: Screen remains dark after upgrade to
experimental versions
Noted your statemen
35 matches
Mail list logo
