Author: julien
Date: 2007-01-22 03:24:30 -0500 (Mon, 22 Jan 2007)
New Revision: 4213
Modified:
branches/etch/app/xdm/debian/xdm.postinst.in
Log:
Use the FIRSTINST variable from xsfbs.mk to test for initial installation.
Modified: branches/etch/app/xdm/debian/xdm.postinst.in
==
Author: julien
Date: 2007-01-22 03:29:33 -0500 (Mon, 22 Jan 2007)
New Revision: 4214
Modified:
branches/etch/app/xdm/debian/changelog
branches/etch/app/xdm/debian/control
Log:
* Add myself to Uploaders, and remove Fabio and Branden with their
permission. They're welcome back whenever they
Author: julien
Date: 2007-01-22 03:42:23 -0500 (Mon, 22 Jan 2007)
New Revision: 4215
Added:
tags/app/xdm/xdm-1:1.0.5-2/
Log:
Tagging upload of xdm 1:1.0.5-2 to unstable.
Copied: tags/app/xdm/xdm-1:1.0.5-2 (from rev 4214, branches/etch/app/xdm)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
xdm_1.0.5-2_alpha.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
xdm_1.0.5-2.dsc
xdm_1.0.5-2.diff.gz
xdm_1.0.5-2_alpha.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Accepted:
xdm_1.0.5-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/x/xdm/xdm_1.0.5-2.diff.gz
xdm_1.0.5-2.dsc
to pool/main/x/xdm/xdm_1.0.5-2.dsc
xdm_1.0.5-2_alpha.deb
to pool/main/x/xdm/xdm_1.0.5-2_alpha.deb
Override entries for your package:
xdm_1.0.5-2.dsc - source x11
xdm_1.0.5-2_alpha.deb - optional x11
Annou
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jan 2007 08:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#407342: fixed in xdm 1:1.0.5-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Drew Parsons wrote:
> Johannes wrote:
>> Since some time (unfortunately I don't remember the exact version of the
>> change), the cursor disappears after resuming from suspend-to-ram. It's
>> still possible to use the cursor (clicking things on the desktop or in the
>> menu if you manage to find
No, I haven't tried recently. Please close if you cannot reproduce.
It was a real PITA when I discovered it, but I cannot test it now.
Regards,
Micce
B E G I N : V C A R D
V E R S I O N : 3 . 0
N : H e d i n ; M i k a e l ; ; ;
F N : M i k a e l H e d i n
N I C K N A M E
I haven't got easy access to that hardware any more, so cannot re-test. It's
fine to close the bug report.
-Jason
On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 00:15:06 +0100 , Brice Goglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi Jason,
>
>About 3 years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding the X
>server rejecting a
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jan 2007 21:57:35 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#348224: x11-common: leaves /etc/init.d/x11-common on disk
after purge
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jan 2007 22:56:41 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#308699: [AMD64] X eat big memory,maybe memory leak.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jan 2007 22:55:28 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#224637: incorrect HorizSync used for NEC LCD1700M+NEC
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jan 2007 22:57:44 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#113992: xlibmesa-gl: glXChooseVisual() only tries to use
server :0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jan 2007 22:58:29 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#250915: xserver-xfree86: [s3] X server rejected all
built-in modelines on 86c764/765 [Trio32/64/64V+]
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Nowadays all I know is xorg.conf should in its comments, say the best
way to regenerate this file. E.g.,
# mv xorg.conf xorg.conf.old
# xdebcofigureator #or what ever it is called, that probes hardware
and makes a new xorg.conf.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "un
The bug seems to be fixed...
After some update the problem has gone away.
Andriy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Nowadays all I know is xorg.conf should in its comments, say the best
> way to regenerate this file. E.g.,
> # mv xorg.conf xorg.conf.old
> # xdebcofigureator #or what ever it is called, that probes hardware
> and makes a new xorg.conf
dexconf currently inserts the following
reassign 222932 xserver-xorg-core
tag 222932 + fixed-upstream
thank you
Hi,
The problem is still in xserver-xorg-core 1.1.1-15. But it looks it's
been fixed upstream by the following commit:
http://gitweb.freedesktop.org/?p=xorg/xserver.git;a=commit;h=62d24097932708fbbb62a23614fe63b4b7acf3bd
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 222932 xserver-xorg-core
Bug#222932: /usr/X11R6/man/man5/XF86Config-4.5x.gz: example file not there
Bug reassigned from package `xserver-xfree86' to `xserver-xorg-core'.
> tag 222932 + fixed-upstream
Bug#222932: /usr/X11R6/man/man5/XF86Config-
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.1.0-10
I upgraded my xwindows system from stable to testing and ran into three
problems which took awhile to solve.
First, simply clicking on "+" in aptitude over package "xorg" produced
broken packages. i had to manually look through the broken packages, se
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 08:40:32PM +0100, Brice Goglin wrote:
> About 2 years ago, you reported (or replied to) a bug in the Debian BTS
> regarding a failure of the X server on a nVidia GeForce RX Go2500 board.
> Did any of you guys reproduce this problem recently?
This hardware is long gone for m
New branch 'debian-experimental' available with the following commits:
commit e6e289a17a81a0300d01278709f1dae408005d93
Author: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon Jan 22 22:29:32 2007 -0500
Move unreleased changelog to above the current unstable unreleased.
Also set it for UNRELE
New branch 'svn-7.1' available with the following commits:
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
New branch 'svn-X11R7.1' available with the following commits:
commit fe96fa5af396f0357007aebe484f1eec39ed199c
Author: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon Jul 3 18:03:08 2006 +
Vendor drop of libx11 1.0.3
commit 3d31dd13e86358327380d7f1c40959ed3c87ff69
Author: David Nusinow <[EM
New branch 'debian-unstable' available with the following commits:
commit e1af2d59b0d908b33ddcca4729ad43c82123bb4a
Author: Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri Dec 8 01:22:56 2006 +
* Add patch 021_compose_fclose.diff to fix file descriptor leak when a
Compose file uses the
Brice Goglin wrote:
About 3 years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding
general problems with XFree86 on a Dell Latitude D400.
Do you still have problems running X on this laptop? If not, I will
close this bug in the next weeks.
Brice,
ît remains a pita.
I dunno exactly what was
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 02:59:38AM +0100, Brice Goglin wrote:
> About 3 years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding font
> resolution not following the rules. Did you reproduce this problem
> recently? If not, I will close this bug in the next weeks.
Well, I can confirm the same beha
Uwe Dippel wrote:
> Brice Goglin wrote:
>
>> About 3 years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding
>> general problems with XFree86 on a Dell Latitude D400.
>> Do you still have problems running X on this laptop? If not, I will
>> close this bug in the next weeks.
>
> Brice,
>
> ît rema
Brice Goglin wrote:
Did you have a chance to try Etch instead of Sarge? There have been lots
of changes regarding the support of this hardware between XFree86/Sarge
and Xorg/Etch. It would be great if you could try.
What is 855wrap ? Is it the 855resolution package?
No. It is a wrapper for th
On 1/17/07, Brice Goglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Jason,
Did you manage to get X back to work since you reported this bug 4 month
ago? You could eventually try Xorg 7.1 currently in testing. But it is
strange that this machine breaks with sarge r3 while it worked with r2.
No. I never hear
30 matches
Mail list logo
