Author: dparsons
Date: 2006-11-05 05:31:54 -0500 (Sun, 05 Nov 2006)
New Revision: 3942
Added:
trunk/driver/xserver-xorg-input-evdev/debian/patches/40-close-fd.patch
Modified:
trunk/driver/xserver-xorg-input-evdev/debian/changelog
trunk/driver/xserver-xorg-input-evdev/debian/patches/series
Author: dparsons
Date: 2006-11-05 05:39:06 -0500 (Sun, 05 Nov 2006)
New Revision: 3943
Added:
trunk/driver/xserver-xorg-input-evdev/debian/xserver-xorg-input-evdev.manpages
Modified:
trunk/driver/xserver-xorg-input-evdev/debian/changelog
trunk/driver/xserver-xorg-input-evdev/debian/rules
xserver-xorg-input-evdev_1.1.2-6_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
xserver-xorg-input-evdev_1.1.2-6.dsc
xserver-xorg-input-evdev_1.1.2-6.diff.gz
xserver-xorg-input-evdev_1.1.2-6_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
Accepted:
xserver-xorg-input-evdev_1.1.2-6.diff.gz
to
pool/main/x/xserver-xorg-input-evdev/xserver-xorg-input-evdev_1.1.2-6.diff.gz
xserver-xorg-input-evdev_1.1.2-6.dsc
to pool/main/x/xserver-xorg-input-evdev/xserver-xorg-input-evdev_1.1.2-6.dsc
xserver-xorg-input-evdev_1.1.2-6_i386.deb
to
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.1.0-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
after the recent xserver-xorg testing upgrade (the system was on testing
before) the xserver rendered unusable. it issues a:
(**) RADEON(0): Initializing DPMS
(**) RADEON(0): Initializing Cursor
(**)
Author: julien
Date: 2006-11-05 08:18:05 -0500 (Sun, 05 Nov 2006)
New Revision: 3944
Modified:
trunk/app/xterm/debian/changelog
trunk/app/xterm/debian/control
Log:
* Add myself to Uploaders.
Modified: trunk/app/xterm/debian/changelog
=
Author: dparsons
Date: 2006-11-05 08:38:03 -0500 (Sun, 05 Nov 2006)
New Revision: 3945
Added:
tags/driver/xserver-xorg-input-evdev/1:1.1.2-6/
Log:
Tag xserver-xorg-input-evdev (1:1.1.2-6) in unstable.
Copied: tags/driver/xserver-xorg-input-evdev/1:1.1.2-6 (from rev 3944,
trunk/driver/xserver
Author: julien
Date: 2006-11-05 08:38:26 -0500 (Sun, 05 Nov 2006)
New Revision: 3946
Modified:
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/xserver-xorg.templates
Log:
Revert change to debconf templates, because I'm afraid of bubulle's wrath.
Modified: trunk/debian/xorg/debian/xserver-xorg.templates
Author: julien
Date: 2006-11-05 08:51:58 -0500 (Sun, 05 Nov 2006)
New Revision: 3947
Modified:
trunk/app/xterm/debian/changelog
trunk/app/xterm/debian/control
trunk/app/xterm/debian/rules
Log:
* Bump Standards-Version to 3.7.2.
* Use "make distclean" instead of "make clean" so that config
Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It doesn't. Writeback is a minor performance optimization, the lack of
> which should not affect operation of the X server.
>
> If you suspect the hardware might be faulty, you could verify that with
> another OS.
I tried on ubuntu 6.06, and it's having
Package: xserver-xorg-video-ati
Version: 1:6.6.3-2
Severity: normal
$ xset q says:
...
DPMS (Energy Star):
Standby: 480Suspend: 600Off: 3000
DPMS is Enabled
Monitor is On
but DPMS does not switch the monitor to anything else but "On."
$ xset dpms force standby
$ xset dpms force su
Package: xorg
Version: N/A
Severity: wishlist
Tags: l10n patch
xserver-xorg_po_ko.po.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
pgpUDo121GGBc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Lets Face a simple Factthe ladies don't like a small (c)ock.
Some may say size doesn't matter, but they are just being nice.
Check out our proven product, and lets resolve your "little" problem.
Product domain: www.spruced.net
*Cut and Paste product domain into browser
Don't have a "little"
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-11-05 20:10:31 -0500 (Sun, 05 Nov 2006)
New Revision: 3948
Modified:
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/xserver-xorg.postinst.in
Log:
* Update xserver-xorg.postinst.in commentary to be more accurate
* Prepare changelog for upload
Modifie
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-11-05 20:21:53 -0500 (Sun, 05 Nov 2006)
New Revision: 3949
Added:
tags/debian/xorg/xorg-1:7.1.0-6/
Log:
Tagging upload of xorg-1:7.1.0-6 to unstable.
Copied: tags/debian/xorg/xorg-1:7.1.0-6 (from rev 3948, trunk/debian/xorg)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
Lets Face a simple Factthe ladies don't like a small (c)ock.
Some may say size doesn't matter, but they are just being nice.
Check out our proven product, and lets resolve your "little" problem.
Product domain: www.spruced.net
*Cut and Paste product domain into browser
Don't have a "little"
Your message dated Sun, 05 Nov 2006 17:32:39 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365358: fixed in xorg 1:7.1.0-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Sun, 05 Nov 2006 17:32:39 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#364965: fixed in xorg 1:7.1.0-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
I believe that this is the same bug as #291137.
Juliusz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Sun, 05 Nov 2006 17:32:39 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#391602: fixed in xorg 1:7.1.0-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Sun, 05 Nov 2006 17:32:39 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365358: fixed in xorg 1:7.1.0-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Sun, 05 Nov 2006 17:32:39 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365358: fixed in xorg 1:7.1.0-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Sun, 05 Nov 2006 17:32:39 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396279: fixed in xorg 1:7.1.0-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
I've just fixed this upstream.
Juliusz
pgpdsFjNFquic.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Your message dated Sun, 05 Nov 2006 17:32:39 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396484: fixed in xorg 1:7.1.0-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Sun, 05 Nov 2006 17:32:39 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365358: fixed in xorg 1:7.1.0-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-11-05 21:29:52 -0500 (Sun, 05 Nov 2006)
New Revision: 3950
Added:
tags/app/xterm/xterm-222-1/
Log:
Tagging upload of xterm-222-1 to unstable.
Copied: tags/app/xterm/xterm-222-1 (from rev 3949, trunk/app/xterm)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Your message dated Sun, 05 Nov 2006 18:32:28 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#381591: fixed in xterm 222-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Sun, 05 Nov 2006 18:32:29 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#384925: fixed in xterm 222-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Sun, 05 Nov 2006 18:32:29 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#395764: fixed in xterm 222-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Author: julien
Date: 2006-11-05 22:03:44 -0500 (Sun, 05 Nov 2006)
New Revision: 3951
Added:
trunk/app/xutils/debian/patches/02_luit_fix_race_condition.diff
Modified:
trunk/app/xutils/debian/changelog
trunk/app/xutils/debian/patches/series
Log:
* Add patch from upstream git to fix race con
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.22
> forcemerge 291137 381476
Bug#291137: /usr/X11R6/bin/luit: luit sometimes doesn't restore terminal
settings or hangs
Bug#381476: luit behave strangely with some programs
Forcibly Merg
> Could not init font path element /usr/local/share/fonts, removing from list!
> Could not init font path element /usr/share/fonts, removing from list!
> Could not init font path element /usr/share/fonts/truetype, removing from
> list!
> Could not init font path element /usr/share/fonts/type1, re
Author: julien
Date: 2006-11-06 00:42:40 -0500 (Mon, 06 Nov 2006)
New Revision: 3952
Added:
trunk/app/xutils/rgb/
trunk/app/xutils/rgb/AUTHORS
trunk/app/xutils/rgb/COPYING
trunk/app/xutils/rgb/ChangeLog
trunk/app/xutils/rgb/INSTALL
trunk/app/xutils/rgb/Makefile.am
trunk/app/xu
Author: bubulle
Date: 2006-11-06 02:12:25 -0500 (Mon, 06 Nov 2006)
New Revision: 3953
Modified:
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/po/ar.po
Log:
Arabic translation completed
Modified: trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog
==
Author: bubulle
Date: 2006-11-06 02:13:58 -0500 (Mon, 06 Nov 2006)
New Revision: 3954
Added:
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/po/ko.po
Modified:
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog
Log:
Added Korean translation
Modified: trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog
tags 397218 pending
thanks
Quoting Sunjae Park ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: xorg
> Version: N/A
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: l10n patch
Committed. It unfortunately missed the release by a few hours, but
there are chances that another upload in 10 days includes it.
--
signature.asc
De
Your message dated Mon, 06 Nov 2006 18:12:50 +1100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gnome-applets: gnome-keyboard-applet cannot load XKB
configuration registry
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 397218 pending
Bug#397218: [INTL:ko] xorg d-i translation
Tags were: l10n patch
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Juliusz Chroboczek 写道:
> I believe that this is the same bug as #291137.
>
> Juliusz
>
Thank you for the information!
The patch mentioned in http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1093
do fix my problem. So maybe the strike force should make it into
next
40 matches
Mail list logo
