Bug#88054: James Block wrote:

hi James i hope this is your mailbox. I was glad to see you the other day. I expect you was excited about New York. So much so much happening all the time, lots of great opportunities. And speaking of opportunities, the deal I was speaking you about yesterday involves a company named Tex-Homa

Processed: reassign 393815 to xorg

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > reassign 393815 xorg Bug#393815: [INTL:wo] Wolof xserver-xorg templates translation Warning: Unknown package 'x.org' Bug reassigned from package `x.org' to `xorg'. > End of message,

Bug#24192: Work has been closed permanently

, Learn how to generate 1.5 - 3.5k per day from your house. 800.691.4528 Contact me at my number if you can return phone calls. Thank you, Raphael Philips -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: new mail address

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > submitter 302240 ! Bug#302240: kaddressbook: strange handling of vcard-directory as address-ressource Changed Bug submitter from Bastian Venthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Bastian Venthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > submitter 327113 ! Bug#327113: setterm -pow

Bug#390943: tries to overwrite '/usr/X11R6/bin', which is in package xgl

Hi It looks like I still have the same problem as David Nusinow reportet in bugreport 390943. When I try to upgrading x11-common from 1:7.1.0-3 to 1:7.1.0-4 I get an error The error aptitude returned are in Danish, but I hope you can make a mening out of it. I have made som translations Gør k

Bug#393929: dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg possibly uses a bashism

Package: xserver-xorg Version: 1:7.1.0-4 Severity: minor Here is what happens when sh is linked to dash: # dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg [: 31: ==: unexpected operator xserver-xorg postinst warning: overwriting possibly-customised configuration file; backup in /etc/X11/xorg.conf.20061018161248

Bug#390943: tries to overwrite '/usr/X11R6/bin', which is in package xgl

Thomas Ter-Borch wrote: Hi It looks like I still have the same problem as David Nusinow reportet in bugreport 390943. When I try to upgrading x11-common from 1:7.1.0-3 to 1:7.1.0-4 I get an error Gør klar til at erstatte x11-common 1:7.1.0-3 (med .../x11-common_1% 3a7.1.0-4_i386.deb)... Udpak

Bug#389864: xserver-xorg-core: Default RgbPath broken

Package: xserver-xorg-core Version: 2:1.1.1-9 Followup-For: Bug #389864 to clarify the issue, i'll report to you an excerpt from /usr/share/doc/xserver-xorg-core/changelog.gz 2006-02-15 Keith Packard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Makefile.am: * Xext/Makefile.am: [...]

Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#393815: [INTL:wo] Wolof xserver-xorg templates translation

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 393815 xorg Bug#393815: [INTL:wo] Wolof xserver-xorg templates translation Bug reassigned from package `xorg' to `xorg'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (a

Processed: [bts-link] source package xserver-xorg-video-ati

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package xserver-xorg-video-ati > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). > # remote

Bug#393991: xdmxconfig binary is missing

Package: xdmx Version: 2:1.1.1-9 Severity: normal The xdmx package contains the manpage for xdmxconfig, but not the binary! cheers, Phil -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked

[bts-link] source package xserver-xorg-video-ati

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package xserver-xorg-video-ati # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #385942 # * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6966 # * remote status changed: REOP

Bug#390287: Remove xawtv?

Hi Mario, > Did xawtv ever work for you? And if so: can you trace back when it > stopped to do so? It did not work for me, but I haven't tried it a longer time ago. I can do a binary search with some packages from snapshot.debian.net if you think that's useful. > Oh, and what exactly do you mean

Bug#327690: marked as done (breaks /etc/X11/X symlink)

Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:30:36 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#327690: xserver-xorg-dbg: package structure botched has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not th

Bug#374052: marked as done (xorg: Please package X11R7.1)

Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:32:51 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#374052: xorg: Please package X11R7.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#358253: marked as done (pkg-config files in /usr/X11R6, should be in /usr/lib)

Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:31:20 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#358253: pkg-config files in /usr/X11R6, should be in /usr/lib has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If thi

Bug#349236: marked as done (xorg-x11: "debuild clean" leaves debian/*-dbg directories)

Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:34:17 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#349236: xorg-x11: "debuild clean" leaves debian/*-dbg directories has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#326238: marked as done (cannot sensibly run find /usr in config script)

Your message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:45:29 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#326238: cannot sensibly run find /usr in config script has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not