On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 10:18:03PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> Thanks for the ellaboration. This sounds like a strange race, though. It
> would require the user to launch the client before the server has finished its
> startup, which AFAICT can only be done from a shell that doesn't belong to
>
Package: libx11
Version: 2:1.0.0-8
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Hi, when I try to build libx11 under etch or sid I get the following error:
make[3]: Leaving directory
`/scratch/build/amd64/etch-biarch/xorg/libx11/libx11-1.0.0/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/src/util'
../src
Package: xorg-server
Version: 2:1.1.1-5
Severity: normal
The configure script in xorg-server barfs if x11proto-fixes-dev is less
than version 4.0 anyway, so might as well enforce it with versioned
build-depends...
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
A
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 02:01:59PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Package: libx11
> Version: 2:1.0.0-8
> Severity: serious
> Justification: no longer builds from source
>
> Hi, when I try to build libx11 under etch or sid I get the following error:
>
> make[3]: Leaving directory
> `/scratc
Package: xserver-xorg-input-keyboard
Version: 1:1.1.0-1
Severity: normal
The configure script in xserver-xorg-input-keyboard barfs if xserver-xorg-dev
is less than version 1.0.99.901 anyway, so might as well enforce it with
versioned build-depends...
I imagine this sort of build-dependancy exists
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 02:01:59PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Package: libx11
>> Version: 2:1.0.0-8
>> Severity: serious
>> Justification: no longer builds from source
>>
>> Hi, when I try to build libx11 under etch or sid I get the following
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006, Robert Millan wrote:
> Thanks for the ellaboration. This sounds like a strange race, though. It
> would require the user to launch the client before the server has finished its
> startup, which AFAICT can only be done from a shell that doesn't belong to
> this server session
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 10:23:15AM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2006, Robert Millan wrote:
> > Thanks for the ellaboration. This sounds like a strange race, though. It
> > would require the user to launch the client before the server has finished
> > its
> > startup, which AFAICT
Title: ITA/ITP compiz
I would like to take maintainership of compiz seeing the big progress we've made wrt AIGLX and Mesa.
I am working with the debian mentors to get the requirements delt with. However, I would like to have the package remain (as mentioned by David) with the Debian X Strik
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 07:09:36PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2006, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > My opinion is that whoever creates the environment variable which lists
> > > the socket should make sure the socket is available before spreading
> > > the news,
> > It did, and at th
reassign 385976 xtrans
tag 385976 + patch
stop
Hi,
Please find a proposed patch attached (both the patch for the Debian
package and the actual patch file are attached). (Reassigning to
xtrans because it's what the patch is against.)
Bye,
--
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -u
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006, Robert Millan wrote:
> > My opinion is that whoever creates the environment variable which lists
> > the socket should make sure the socket is available before spreading
> > the news,
> It did, and at that time the socket was present. It's just that the socket
> is not the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 385976 xtrans
Bug#385976: SocketUNIXConnect shouldn't return TRANS_TRY_CONNECT_AGAIN when the
socket file doesn't exist
Bug reassigned from package `libice6' to `xtrans'.
> tag 385976 + patch
Bug#385976: SocketUNIXConnect shouldn't return TRA
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 03:50:04PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 02:01:59PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Package: libx11
> > Version: 2:1.0.0-8
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification: no longer builds from source
> > Hi, when I try to build libx11 under etch or si
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 01:23:52PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 03:50:04PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 02:01:59PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > > Hi, when I try to build libx11 under etch or sid I get the following
> > > error:
>
> > >
Package: xdm
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1
Severity: important
xdm has a password length limit of 32, as seen in
xc/programs/xdm/greeter/Login.h
Note that I'm not sure about the version, since I run some backports stuff,
but the source was from sarge, not backports.
And don't say "nobody needs passw
On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 16:23 +0200, Jan Willem Stumpel wrote:
> Hmm.. this is a keyboard thing, not a display thing, so how could
> a URL help? xev can be used to verify the fix, of course.
>
> The bug itself has been reported already in Ubuntu and SuSE,
> though not in Debian, e.g.
>
> http://ww
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Crap, I checked for this sort of thing more than once,
> # must have been looking in the wrong place...
> # I blame the querybts script in reportbug... ^_^
> merge 383778 387145
Bug#383778: xorg-server: x11proto-fixes-dev build-depends is too weak
Bug
18 matches
Mail list logo
