Bug#111050: my chance

Hi, Hbope I am not writing tob wrong address. I am nice, pretty looking girl. I am planning on visiting your town this month. Can we meet each oather in person? Message me back at [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact

Bug#118863: marked as done (xserver-xfree86: [nv] SEGV when using Konqueror browser at alwahabiya.org website on Riva Ultra 64 rev 21)

Your message dated Sun, 11 Jun 2006 12:12:03 +0200 (CEST) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line unreproducible has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibili

Bug#201855: chance of a lifetime

Hiare, i am here siatating in the internet caffe. Found your email and decided to write. I might be coming to your place in 14 daays, so I decided to email you. May be we can meet? I am 25! y.o. girl. I have a pi!ctaure if you want. No need to reply here as this is not my ema!il. Write me at [EMA

Re: xfig can't find fonts

* Steve Langasek [Sat, 10 Jun 2006 21:47:30 -0700]: > clone 366948 -1 > reassign -1 xfonts-utils 1:1.0.0-4 > retitle -1 update-scale-fonts: fails on empty dirs > tags -1 = patch > thanks (Bounced this to control@, since I can't find the new bug against xfonts-utils.) > Hi Dato, Hey, :) > On Fr

Bug#369167: DRI probably broken: where to reportbug

On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 00:54 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 10:57:52AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 11:48 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > > (II) RADEON(0): [dri] Found DRI library version 1.2.0 and kernel module > > > version 1.25.0

Bug#372753: xfonts-utils: update manpage

Package: xfonts-utils Version: 1:1.0.0-4 Severity: normal Please document the -7 and --x11r7-layout options in the manpage (assuming you can figure out what exactly they do!) -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture

Bug#372756: Should include

Package: libxfixes-dev Version: 1:3.0.1.2-4 Severity: normal /usr/include/X11/extensions/Xfixes.h relies on the "Bool" define from X11/Xlib.h but does not include that header (directly or indirectly). This will break testing for the XFIXES extension through AC_CHECK_HEADER(X11/extensions/X

Bug#369167: DRI probably broken: where to reportbug

On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 01:34:52PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 00:54 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 10:57:52AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 11:48 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > > > > (II) RADEON(0): [

Bug#369167: DRI probably broken: where to reportbug

On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 20:14 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 01:34:52PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > > Does the attached patch help with Option "UseFBDev"? > > Yes. :))) ... Thanks a lot, Michel ... :) Excellent, thanks for testing. Ben, do you think this will al

Annoying warning note in fresh installs

I was today testing the fresh install of Etch with the desktop task (D-I related work) and I have been very surprised to see the warning note about "possible problems during the major upgrade". I seem to remember reading Steve Langasek mentioning this, but this is something that definitely should

Re: Annoying warning note in fresh installs

On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 09:49:04PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > I was today testing the fresh install of Etch with the desktop task > (D-I related work) and I have been very surprised to see the warning > note about "possible problems during the major upgrade". > > I seem to remember reading

Bug#372687: Ordinary user can't start xorg

On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 12:26:03AM -0400, Jack Carroll wrote: > Package: xorg > Version: 1:7.0.20 > > Under Etch, an ordinary user can't start the windowing system. > In this test, /etc/rc2.d has been edited so that it doesn't start > gdm at boot time. > The user "anna" logs in a

Bug#372278: xserver-xorg-input-all: using clipboard with >8 bits characters doesn't work

On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 11:02:01AM +0200, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote: > Package: xserver-xorg-input-all > Severity: normal > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello. > > I'm not sure which package should I choose for this particular problem > cause I'm not aware of intern

Bug#369167: DRI probably broken: where to reportbug

On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 08:31:14PM +0200, Michel D??nzer wrote: > On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 20:14 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 01:34:52PM +0200, Michel D??nzer wrote: > > > > > > Does the attached patch help with Option "UseFBDev"? > > > > Yes. :))) ... Thanks a lot, Mi

Bug#367260: bug appears to be fixed

This bug appears to have been fixed with the xserver-xorg 7.0.20. -- Jeff Jeff Abrahamson +1 215/837-2287 GPG fingerprint: 1A1A BA95 D082 A558 A276 63C6 16BF 8C4C 0D1D AE4B -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". T

Bug#370149: FTBFS: not compatible with FreeType 2.2

On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 10:42:17PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote: > > Yes, a new upstream version of the library was just released dealing with > > this issue. I'll be uploading it to unstable within a day or two hopefully. > > Hate to be a nuisance, but I hope you don't mean 1.1.0. > > This thread u

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2299 - trunk/app/xutils/debian

Author: dnusinow Date: 2006-06-11 19:01:07 -0400 (Sun, 11 Jun 2006) New Revision: 2299 Modified: trunk/app/xutils/debian/changelog trunk/app/xutils/debian/rules trunk/app/xutils/debian/xutils.install Log: + We can drop the explicit shipping of rstart's commands in the .install file

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2300 - trunk/app/xutils/debian

Author: dnusinow Date: 2006-06-11 19:11:52 -0400 (Sun, 11 Jun 2006) New Revision: 2300 Modified: trunk/app/xutils/debian/changelog trunk/app/xutils/debian/compat trunk/app/xutils/debian/control trunk/app/xutils/debian/rules Log: * Bump debhelper compat to version 5 Modified: trunk/app

Bug#367260: marked as done (xorg-server: server fails to start at 2048x1536 but starts at 1920x1440 (then crashes))

Your message dated Sun, 11 Jun 2006 18:49:41 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#367260: bug appears to be fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#369167: DRI probably broken: where to reportbug

On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 20:31 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 20:14 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 01:34:52PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > > > > Does the attached patch help with Option "UseFBDev"? > > > > Yes. :))) ... Thanks a lot, Michel ...

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2301 - trunk/app/xutils/debian

Author: dnusinow Date: 2006-06-11 19:15:31 -0400 (Sun, 11 Jun 2006) New Revision: 2301 Modified: trunk/app/xutils/debian/changelog trunk/app/xutils/debian/control Log: * Version pre-depends on x11-common * Bump policy version to 3.7.2.0 Modified: trunk/app/xutils/debian/changelog ==

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2302 - in trunk/app/xutils: debian fslsfonts-X11R7.0-1.0.1 fslsfonts-X11R7.0-1.0.1/autom4te.cache luit-X11R7.0-1.0.1 luit-X11R7.0-1.0.1/autom4te.cache rstart rsta

Author: dnusinow Date: 2006-06-11 19:36:01 -0400 (Sun, 11 Jun 2006) New Revision: 2302 Added: trunk/app/xutils/fslsfonts-X11R7.0-1.0.1/autom4te.cache/ trunk/app/xutils/fslsfonts-X11R7.0-1.0.1/autom4te.cache/output.0 trunk/app/xutils/fslsfonts-X11R7.0-1.0.1/autom4te.cache/requests trunk

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2303 - trunk/app/xutils/debian

Author: dnusinow Date: 2006-06-11 19:43:29 -0400 (Sun, 11 Jun 2006) New Revision: 2303 Modified: trunk/app/xutils/debian/changelog trunk/app/xutils/debian/control Log: * Add suggests on pdksh because the xauth_switch_to_sun-des-1 script is a ksh script. Document this requirement in the pac

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2304 - trunk/app/xutils/debian

Author: dnusinow Date: 2006-06-11 20:22:23 -0400 (Sun, 11 Jun 2006) New Revision: 2304 Modified: trunk/app/xutils/debian/changelog Log: Prepare changelog for upload to unstable Modified: trunk/app/xutils/debian/changelog === --- t

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2305 - tags/app/xutils

Author: dnusinow Date: 2006-06-11 20:25:31 -0400 (Sun, 11 Jun 2006) New Revision: 2305 Added: tags/app/xutils/xutils-7.1.ds-1/ Log: Tag upload of xutils-7.1.ds-1 to unstable Copied: tags/app/xutils/xutils-7.1.ds-1 (from rev 2304, trunk/app/xutils) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECT

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2306 - trunk/app/xbase-clients/xdbedizzy-X11R7.0-1.0.1

Author: dnusinow Date: 2006-06-11 21:04:38 -0400 (Sun, 11 Jun 2006) New Revision: 2306 Modified: trunk/app/xbase-clients/xdbedizzy-X11R7.0-1.0.1/configure Log: autoreconf with vorlon's patch applied to let xdbedizzy build without xprint Modified: trunk/app/xbase-clients/xdbedizzy-X11R7.0-1.0.1

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2307 - in trunk/app/xbase-clients/debian: . patches

Author: dnusinow Date: 2006-06-11 21:12:29 -0400 (Sun, 11 Jun 2006) New Revision: 2307 Modified: trunk/app/xbase-clients/debian/changelog trunk/app/xbase-clients/debian/patches/11_xkb_documentation_updates.diff Log: * Update 11_xkb_documentation_updates.diff to not use __manpagesuffix__ im

Bug#369504: xbase-clients: use /usr/bin/Xorg instead of /usr/bin/X in /usr/bin/startx and /etc/X11/xinit/xserverrc

On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:18:55AM +0200, Attila Kinali wrote: > On Tue, 30 May 2006 11:11:27 +0200 > Michel D??nzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 11:02 +0200, Attila Kinali wrote: > > > Package: xbase-clients > > > Version: 1:7.0.1-2 > > > Severity: important > > > > > >

Processed: Setting severity

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 372079 important Bug#372079: xserver-xorg-video-mga: strange frequency behavior with dvi Severity set to `important' from `grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system adminis

Processed: hehe

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 354577 minor Bug#354577: xbase-clients: [xfontsel] xfontsel doesn't see all fonts if there's more than 32768 of them Severity set to `minor' from `important' > tags 354577 + wontfix Bug#354577: xbase-clients: [xfontsel] xfontsel doesn't see a

Bug#371874: x11-common postinst error: trouble with /usr/include/X11

On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 10:48:44PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Package: x11-common > > Version: 1:7.0.20 > > Severity: grave > > X-Debbugs-CC: "Henk Boom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > x11-common postinst error: trouble with /usr/include/X11 > > > > > > We get this

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2308 - trunk/app/xbase-clients/debian

Author: dnusinow Date: 2006-06-11 21:51:42 -0400 (Sun, 11 Jun 2006) New Revision: 2308 Modified: trunk/app/xbase-clients/debian/changelog trunk/app/xbase-clients/debian/compat trunk/app/xbase-clients/debian/control trunk/app/xbase-clients/debian/rules Log: * Bump standards version to 3

Bug#356539: Script to fix it while waiting on upstream.

Use this rather then doing it manually while we wait for * upstream to fix it. * upstream to release the fix * Debian to package the fixed upstream release. I have no idea why this doesn't qualify as a Debian-fixable bug rather then an upstream. If it is a Debian packaging issue, in that upstr

Bug#356539: Script to fix it while waiting on upstream.

On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 09:56:12PM -0400, Dan Merillat wrote: > > Use this rather then doing it manually while we wait for > > * upstream to fix it. > * upstream to release the fix > * Debian to package the fixed upstream release. > > I have no idea why this doesn't qualify as a Debian-fixable b

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2309 - trunk/app/xbase-clients/debian

Author: dnusinow Date: 2006-06-11 22:50:43 -0400 (Sun, 11 Jun 2006) New Revision: 2309 Modified: trunk/app/xbase-clients/debian/changelog Log: Prepare changelog for upload Modified: trunk/app/xbase-clients/debian/changelog === ---

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2310 - tags/app/xbase-clients

Author: dnusinow Date: 2006-06-11 22:57:06 -0400 (Sun, 11 Jun 2006) New Revision: 2310 Added: tags/app/xbase-clients/xbase-clients-7.1.ds-1/ Log: Tag upload of xbase-clients-7.1.ds-1 to unstable Copied: tags/app/xbase-clients/xbase-clients-7.1.ds-1 (from rev 2309, trunk/app/xbase-clients)

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2311 - branches

Author: dnusinow Date: 2006-06-11 23:02:48 -0400 (Sun, 11 Jun 2006) New Revision: 2311 Added: branches/7.1/ Log: Create branch for 7.1 work Copied: branches/7.1 (from rev 2310, trunk) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PRO

Bug#371874: x11-common postinst error: trouble with /usr/include/X11

David Nusinow wrote: > Ok, this is an extremely troubling bug. The previous x11-common's postinst > gets called when the new x11-common's postinst fails with the /usr/bin/X11 > switch. No the problem is not that the new postinst is failing (nor does dpkg do any error-unwind involving the old posti

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2312 - trunk/debian/xorg/debian

Author: dnusinow Date: 2006-06-11 23:35:55 -0400 (Sun, 11 Jun 2006) New Revision: 2312 Modified: trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog Log: * Correct the sections on the transitional packages (closes: #371874) Modified: trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog ==

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2301 - trunk/app/xutils/debian

On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 07:15:32PM -0400, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin wrote: > Author: dnusinow > Date: 2006-06-11 19:15:31 -0400 (Sun, 11 Jun 2006) > New Revision: 2301 > + * Version pre-depends on x11-common There is no pre-depends in the diff: > -Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:D

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2313 - trunk/debian/xorg/debian

Author: dnusinow Date: 2006-06-11 23:38:10 -0400 (Sun, 11 Jun 2006) New Revision: 2313 Modified: trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog Log: Fix closer and thank the appropriate parties Modified: trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog ===

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2314 - trunk/debian/xorg/debian

Author: dnusinow Date: 2006-06-11 23:38:56 -0400 (Sun, 11 Jun 2006) New Revision: 2314 Modified: trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog Log: Add more thank you's Modified: trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog === --- trunk/debian/xorg/d

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2301 - trunk/app/xutils/debian

On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 08:34:57AM +0500, Stepan Golosunov wrote: > On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 07:15:32PM -0400, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin > wrote: > > Author: dnusinow > > Date: 2006-06-11 19:15:31 -0400 (Sun, 11 Jun 2006) > > New Revision: 2301 > > > + * Version pre-depends on x11-commo

Bug#372839: problem with x11-common

Package: x11-common Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 Hi, I just tried to do an apt-get dist-upgrade. When it came to upgrading x11-common I got the message that /usr/X11R6/bin is not empty and that I should empty it and run the installation again. So I did and got the following error message: Preparing

Bug#371874: x11-common postinst error: trouble with /usr/include/X11

On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 10:30:21PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > David Nusinow wrote: > > Ok, this is an extremely troubling bug. The previous x11-common's postinst > > gets called when the new x11-common's postinst fails with the /usr/bin/X11 > > switch. > > No the problem is not that the new postins

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2315 - trunk/debian/xorg/debian

Author: dnusinow Date: 2006-06-11 23:52:02 -0400 (Sun, 11 Jun 2006) New Revision: 2315 Modified: trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog Log: Prepare changelog for upload to unstable Modified: trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog === ---

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2316 - tags/debian/xorg

Author: dnusinow Date: 2006-06-11 23:54:57 -0400 (Sun, 11 Jun 2006) New Revision: 2316 Added: tags/debian/xorg/xorg-7.0.22/ Log: Tag upload of xorg-7.0.22 to unstable Copied: tags/debian/xorg/xorg-7.0.22 (from rev 2315, trunk/debian/xorg) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Bug#371874: x11-common postinst error: trouble with /usr/include/X11

On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 10:30:21PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > David Nusinow wrote: > > Ok, this is an extremely troubling bug. The previous x11-common's postinst > > gets called when the new x11-common's postinst fails with the /usr/bin/X11 > > switch. > No the problem is not that the new postinst

Bug#371152: marked as done (upgrade failure determining smoking_guns)

Your message dated Sun, 11 Jun 2006 21:02:11 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#371152: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.22 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#371874: marked as done (x11-common postinst error: trouble with /usr/include/X11)

Your message dated Sun, 11 Jun 2006 21:02:11 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#371874: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.22 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Re: Annoying warning note in fresh installs

> Right, I don't like it but I don't have a clean fix for it yet. The reason > being that x11-common didn't exist in sarge so I can't simply check for an > upgrade. Ideally I would look for xserver-common being on the system and > put the note up in that case, but that package should be removed p

Bug#356539: Script to fix it while waiting on upstream.

David Nusinow wrote: I am currently in the process of fixing it, but it requires a lot of rebuilds and is not so critical as hosing people's systems on upgrade. Calm down. It'll be fixed with 7.1, which is what I'm working on right now. Hey, I provided a fix for it rather then just complaining

Re: Annoying warning note in fresh installs

David Nusinow wrote: > Right, I don't like it but I don't have a clean fix for it yet. The reason > being that x11-common didn't exist in sarge so I can't simply check for an > upgrade. Ideally I would look for xserver-common being on the system and > put the note up in that case, but that package

Bug#369167: DRI probably broken: where to reportbug

On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 17:45 -0400, David Nusinow wrote: > On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 08:31:14PM +0200, Michel D??nzer wrote: > > On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 20:14 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > > > On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 01:34:52PM +0200, Michel D??nzer wrote: > > > > > > > > Does the attached patch he

Bug#356539: Script to fix it while waiting on upstream.

On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 01:52 -0400, Dan Merillat wrote: > David Nusinow wrote: > > > I am currently in the process of fixing it, but it requires a lot of > > rebuilds and is not so critical as hosing people's systems on upgrade. Calm > > down. It'll be fixed with 7.1, which is what I'm working on r