On 2006-01-23 08:37:32 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> I get the following error:
>
> dixsept:~> man x-terminal-emulator
> man: warning: /usr/share/man/man1/x-terminal-emulator.1.gz is a dangling
> symlink
> No manual entry for x-terminal-emulator
The problem is still there in xterm 210-3.
dixs
Package: xbase-clients
Version: 1:7.0.1-1
Severity: normal
A "man atobm" gives the error:
man: can't open /usr/share/man/man1x/bitmap.1x: No such file or directory
before the man page can be found.
dixsept:~> gunzip -c /usr/share/man/man1/atobm.1x.gz
.so man1x/bitmap.1x
but the man page is:
d
El martes, 9 de mayo de 2006 07:23, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
escribió:
> Author: dnusinow
> Date: 2006-05-09 01:23:38 -0400 (Tue, 09 May 2006)
> New Revision: 2119
>
> Added:
>tags/lib/libfontenc/libfontenc-1:1.0.1-6/
> Log:
> Tag upload of libfontenc-1:1.0.1-6 to unstable
>
> Copie
Global Trade Ventures
18b Charles St, Mayfair
London, W1J 5DU
FAX: 44-870-122-4227
TEL: 44-703-194-6650
Dear Friend,
I am Mr.Alan Wright,Head Of Personnel,Global Trade Ventures,London.We are
searching for representatives who can help us establish a medium of getting to
our customers in Ameri
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 7.0.17
I tried to upgrade from Xserver-xfree86 to xserver-xorg. The
XF86Config-4 file had the mouse device as /dev/input/mice. The
rewritten xorg.conf file had /dev/mouse, which doesn't exist on my
system. It looks as though the info in XF86Config-4 is not consu
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 7.0.17
When I run X, I see a display that has a central section that looks
more-or-less normal, surrounded by a band of weirdness. If I tell
Xserver-xorg to use the vesa driver, all works more or less.
My laptop uses a Cirrus logic GD7548
With Xfree86 I used to us
Package: xdm
Version: 1.0.1-6
Inconsistencies in downgrading from sid to etch lead me to completely
reinstalling Debian. So, this report is about Debian etch as of today.
I installed from the CD image
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/etch_di_beta2/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso.
I de
On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 12:32 +0200, Sven Marnach wrote:
> Michel Dänzer schrieb am Di, 09. Mai 2006, um 09:04:34 +0200:
> >
> > Please provide full(!) X config and log files.
>
> I attached the log with DRI enabled.
Thanks.
Does either of the following options make a difference?
Option
i'm sorry for this. the ati-driver does know 0x5462! it must have been a
version before 1:6.5.8.0-1! this version does know 0x5462!!! i found
out today! suspend, resume seems to work fine too, even with dri and
exa! sorry, sorry, sorry...
yours curt
--
greetings from austria
well, though
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 1:1.0.2-7
Followup-For: Bug #362556
xdm stopped accepting normal english characters as input unless I modified
/etc/X11/xorg.conf like this:
-"XkbModel" "macintosh"
+"XkbModel" "macintosh_vndr"
However, numbers and the special swedish characters (I can't ty
curt manucredo (hansycm) wrote:
> i'm sorry for this. the ati-driver does know 0x5462! it must have been
> a version before 1:6.5.8.0-1! this version does know 0x5462!!! i
> found out today! suspend, resume seems to work fine too, even with dri
> and exa! sorry, sorry, sorry...
>
> yours curt
Your message dated Tue, 09 May 2006 12:15:57 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365259: xfs fails to start
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Package: xnest
Version: 1:1.0.2-8
Severity: minor
Xnest does not set the WM_CLASS property which makes it difficult to
treat it specially by window managers.
Cheers,
ChriS
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (400, 'unstabl
Your message dated Tue, 09 May 2006 19:17:35 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365765: ati-driver does know 0x5462
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 366556 important
Bug#366556: gnucash fails to start
Severity set to `important'.
> reassign 366556 xfonts-encodings
Bug#366556: gnucash fails to start
Bug reassigned from package `gnucash' to `xfonts-encodings'.
> merge 366556 365403
Bug#3654
On Tue, 09 May 2006 the mental interface of
Vincent Lefevre told:
> Package: xbase-clients
> Version: 1:7.0.1-1
> Severity: normal
>
> A "man atobm" gives the error:
>
> man: can't open /usr/share/man/man1x/bitmap.1x: No such file or directory
>
> before the man page can be found.
>
> dixsept:
Michel Dänzer schrieb am Di, 09. Mai 2006, um 15:07:44 +0200:
>
> Does either of the following options make a difference?
>
> Option "SilkenMouse" "off"
> Option "ColorTiling" "off"
> Option "SWcursor"
No.
> Also, if you're using Option "AGPMode" or any other AGP/DRI related
>
Package: xutils
Severity: important
When I attempt to install xutils I get the following error. I manually
installed x11-common (7.0.17) and libfs6 (1.0.0-3) to try to get around
the issue and it had no effect.
here is the output:
web:/usr# apt-get install xutils
Reading package lists... Done
Hire,
i am here sitting in the internet caffe. Found! your email and
decided to write. I might be coming to your place in 14 dayas,
so I decided to email you. May be we can meet? I am 25 y.o.
gi!rl. I ahave a picture if you want. No need to replya here as
this is not my email. Write me at [EMAIL
Package: xdm
Version: 1:1.0.1-6
Severity: normal
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Phil Endecott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: /etc/X11/xdm/Xservers calls /usr/bin/X, but I have /u
Package: xserver-xorg-video-via
Version: 1:0.1.33.2-3
Severity: normal
Relevant snippet of X log file:
(II) VIA(0): vgaHWGetIOBase: hwp->IOBase is 0x03d0, hwp->PIOOffset is
0x
(II) VIA(0): Caught X working around an old VGA limitation
(HBlankStart).
(II) VIA(0): 3D Engine has been initialize
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 04:51:25PM +0200, Hans Ekbrand wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg-core
> Version: 1:1.0.2-7
> Followup-For: Bug #362556
>
>
> xdm stopped accepting normal english characters as input unless I modified
> /etc/X11/xorg.conf like this:
>
> -"XkbModel" "macintosh"
> +"XkbModel"
Package: xkb-data
Version: 0.8-5
Severity: important
Tags: l10n
Here is an excerpt from my xorg.conf
Section "InputDevice"
Identifier "Generic Keyboard"
Driver "keyboard"
Option "CoreKeyboard"
# Option "XkbRules" "xfree86"
package xdm
severity 366599 grave
merge 365134 366599
thanks
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 08:23:55PM +0100, Phil Endecott wrote:
> Package: xdm
> Version: 1:1.0.1-6
> Severity: normal
>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> From: Phil
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package xdm
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: xdm
> severity 366599 grave
Bug#366599: xdm looks for /usr/bin/X, but I have /usr/X11R6/bin/X
Severity set to `grave'.
> merge 365134 366599
Bug#365134: wrong paths to executables or executables in wrong plac
Hello Debian X Developers,
Would it be possible to add the "libxpm-dev" package also to the
"testing" distribution for "amd64"? According to
http://packages.debian.org/testing/libdevel/libxpm-dev
this package is not yet available for AMD64, although it seems to be
already in the "unstable" d
package xdm
severity 366516 grave
merge 366516 365134
thanks
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 01:01:43PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> (1) At some stage, startx failed because some scripts expect xdm to reside
> in /usr/bin/X11 whereas etch installed it in /usr/bin. A symbolic link
> helped.
>
> At th
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 10:33:44AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Alberto Maurizi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Package: gnucash
> > Version: 1.8.12-8
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
> > below is the result of
> > $ gnucash &> gnuchas.log
> > hope
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package xdm
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: xdm
> severity 366516 grave
Bug#366516: boot process of fresh etch installation does not lead to graphic
login: inconsistent paths /usr/bin vs /usr/bin/X11
Severity set to `grave'.
> merge 366516 365134
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A workaround with the side-effect that anyone with a FontPath of
> /usr/lib/X11/fonts/foo will be unable to see those fonts in
> /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/foo, though.
Yes. It's not a perfect workaround, merely a solution to that one
problem, in one ca
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 11:05:03PM +0200, Hans Blom wrote:
> Hello Debian X Developers,
>
> Would it be possible to add the "libxpm-dev" package also to the
> "testing" distribution for "amd64"? According to
>
> http://packages.debian.org/testing/libdevel/libxpm-dev
>
> this package is not y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> merge 356539 366500
Bug#356539: xbase-clients: same manpages refer to incorrect location (.so
man1x/manpage.1x)
Bug#366500: xbase-clients: bad ROFF .so request in some man pages
Bug#361911: xbase-clients: Man page links to dir man1x instead of man1
Bug
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-05-10 00:00:35 -0400 (Wed, 10 May 2006)
New Revision: 2120
Added:
trunk/font/xfonts-encodings/debian/patches/
trunk/font/xfonts-encodings/debian/patches/01_encodings_dir_absolute_paths.diff
trunk/font/xfonts-encodings/debian/patches/series
trunk/font/xfonts
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-05-10 00:13:00 -0400 (Wed, 10 May 2006)
New Revision: 2121
Modified:
trunk/font/xfonts-encodings/debian/changelog
Log:
Replace missing changelog entry and bump version for new upload
Modified: trunk/font/xfonts-encodings/debian/changelog
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-05-10 00:20:42 -0400 (Wed, 10 May 2006)
New Revision: 2122
Added:
tags/font/xfonts-encodings/xfonts-encodings-1:1.0.0-3/
Log:
Tag upload of xfonts-encodings-1:1.0.0-3 to unstable
Copied: tags/font/xfonts-encodings/xfonts-encodings-1:1.0.0-3 (from rev 2121,
trunk/f
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 03:46:53PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > A workaround with the side-effect that anyone with a FontPath of
> > /usr/lib/X11/fonts/foo will be unable to see those fonts in
> > /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/foo, though.
After
Your message dated Tue, 09 May 2006 21:32:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365403: fixed in xfonts-encodings 1:1.0.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Your message dated Tue, 09 May 2006 21:32:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365403: fixed in xfonts-encodings 1:1.0.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Your message dated Tue, 09 May 2006 21:32:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365403: fixed in xfonts-encodings 1:1.0.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Your message dated Tue, 09 May 2006 21:32:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365403: fixed in xfonts-encodings 1:1.0.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Your message dated Tue, 09 May 2006 21:32:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365403: fixed in xfonts-encodings 1:1.0.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Your message dated Tue, 09 May 2006 21:32:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#365403: fixed in xfonts-encodings 1:1.0.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
I already mentioned here and there that the xorg package debconf
templates do not follow the recommendations given in the developer's
reference, which are mostly aimed at achieving overall writing style
consistency in questions seen by users.
Attached to this mail is a rewrite of the two .template
43 matches
Mail list logo
