Hi,
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 11:59:13PM +0100, Joshua Kite wrote:
> I have just done a dist-upgrade on i386 to attempt to
> resolve this bug and it is certainly not fixed. even
> after upgrading to xserver-xorg-core_1.0.2-4. I still
> get the mesage re missing modules for bitmap and
> pcidata altho
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.16
> merge 362672 362685
Bug#362672: x11-common fails to run post-install scripts
Bug#362685: x11-common: postinst failure
Merged 362672 362685.
>
End of message, stopping processing here
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.16
> tags 361222 + pending
Bug#361222: x11-common: File named /etc/X11/rgb.txt is missing
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> merge 343289 361222
Bug#343289: vim-common: doc/vim
Your message dated Sat, 15 Apr 2006 09:31:33 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line xbase-clients: [setxkbmap] missed /usr/share/X11/xkb directory
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Package: x11-common
Version: 1:7.0.11
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
apt-get dist-upgrade gives the following error and the upgrading stops:
shingouki:~# apt-get dist-upgrade
Luetaan pakettiluetteloita... Valmis
Muodostetaan riippuvuussuhteiden puu... Valmis
Käsitellään p
Package: x11-common
Version: 1:7.0.11
Severity: serious
Setting up x11-common (7.0.11) ...
rmdir: /usr/X11R6/bin: Directory not empty
x11-common postinst error: Could not remove /usr/X11R6/bin. Is not yet empty
dpkg: error processing x11-common (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script r
Package: xserver-xorg-video-s3
Version: 1:0.3.5.4-3
Severity: important
I used to use the S3 driver from XFree86 3.x when running XFree86 4.x
and xorg 6.x, but that no longer seems possible with 7.x. So I tried
to use the S3 driver that comes with 7.x, and that does not seem to
recognise the 88c
Package: xserver-xorg-input-all
Version: 1:7.0.11
This package is supposed to be dependent on all the
xserver-xorg-input-* packages, so that installing this package would
install them all. However, the dependence information is missing in
this package.
Best
Regards,
LIU Xin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 362672 grave
Bug#362672: x11-common fails to run post-install scripts
Bug#362685: x11-common: postinst failure
Severity set to `grave'.
> severity 362685 grave
Bug#362685: x11-common: postinst failure
Bug#362672: x11-common fails to run post-i
Package: xfonts-encodings
Version: 1:1.0.0-2
This package installs all the encoding files into
/usr/share/fonts/X11/encodings/, while the Xorg system ( I don't know
which particular package ) still looks for the encoding files in the
old location /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/encodings/. The result, fo
Package: xserver-xorg-video-all
Version: 1:7.0.11
This package is supposed to be dependent on all the
xserver-xorg-video-* packages, while it is actually not.
Best
Regards,
LIU Xin
Hi Petteri,
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 11:13:20AM +0300, Petteri wrote:
> rmdir: /usr/X11R6/bin: Hakemisto ei ole tyhjä
> x11-common postinst error: Could not remove /usr/X11R6/bin. Is not yet empty
Please forward us a directory listing of /usr/X11R6/bin.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 01:52:30AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Petteri,
>
> On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 11:13:20AM +0300, Petteri wrote:
> > rmdir: /usr/X11R6/bin: Hakemisto ei ole tyhjä
> > x11-common postinst error: Could not remove /usr/X11R6/bin. Is not yet empty
>
> Please forward us a dir
tags 362713 patch
clone 362713 -1
reassign -1 xserver-xorg
thanks
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 10:21:49AM +0200, Joey Hess wrote:
> Package: x11-common
> Version: 1:7.0.11
> Severity: serious
> Setting up x11-common (7.0.11) ...
> rmdir: /usr/X11R6/bin: Directory not empty
> x11-common postinst error:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 362713 grave
Bug#362713: fails to upgrade since /usr/X11R6/bin/X still exists
Severity set to `grave'.
> merge 362713 362672
Bug#362672: x11-common fails to run post-install scripts
Bug#362713: fails to upgrade since /usr/X11R6/bin/X still exi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 362713 patch
Bug#362713: fails to upgrade since /usr/X11R6/bin/X still exists
There were no tags set.
Bug#362672: x11-common fails to run post-install scripts
Bug#362685: x11-common: postinst failure
Bug#362711: x11-common: fails to install
Tags ad
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.16
> merge 361222 343389
Bug#343389: x11-common: missing /etc/X11/rgb.txt file
Bug#361222: x11-common: File named /etc/X11/rgb.txt is missing
Merged 343389 361222.
>
End of message, stopp
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 362439 serious
Bug#362439: Imake.tmpl: No such file or directory
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs dat
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.0.11
Severity: serious
While looking at trying to provide smoother upgrade support for changed
XkbRules names between XF86Config and Xorg, I instead found to my surprise
that all support for upgrading from XF86Config-4 to xorg.conf had been lost
in the X11R7 tran
> I'll delete the symlink manually as a workaround.
Very much *not* recommended! This lets x11-common's postinst complete,
making /usr/X11R6/bin a symlink to /usr/bin, but dpkg will think
xserver-xorg still owns /usr/X11R6/bin/X -- so when *that* symlink is
removed in the next version of the pac
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 12:02:02PM +0300, Petteri wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 01:52:30AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Hi Petteri,
> > On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 11:13:20AM +0300, Petteri wrote:
> > > rmdir: /usr/X11R6/bin: Hakemisto ei ole tyhjä
> > > x11-common postinst error: Could not rem
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.0.11
The current xserver-xorg package no longer Provides: the virtual 'xserver'
package, which all xserver packages have done since time immemorial (or at
least since sarge). As there is no mention of this in the xserver-xorg
changelog, I imagine this was remove
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 02:33:49AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 843K 2005-08-18 05:36 xfs-xtt
> And this turns out to be a really sloppy bug in my code to find packages
> that x11-common needs to conflict with, managing to completely miss the
> stable-only packages by g
Package: xorg
Version: 1:7.0.11
Severity: normal
Starting with Xorg 7.0, X server is not setting MTRR range register
for framebuffer to write-combining which means that display output is
twice slower than before (or using twice as much CPU, depending on the
view). Everything worked correctly up to
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 01:53:53AM -0700, Xin Liu wrote:
> This package installs all the encoding files into
> /usr/share/fonts/X11/encodings/, while the Xorg system ( I don't know
> which particular package ) still looks for the encoding files in the
> old location /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/encodin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> tags 356545 - experimental
Bug#356545: libxau-dev: manpages refer to incorrect location (.so man3x/Xau.3x)
Tags were: experimental
Tags removed: experimental
>
End of message, stoppi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # This bug is now also in unstable and causes system administrators to
> # receive daily cron notices about man-db failing.
> found 356545 1:1.0.0-2
Bug#356545: libxau-dev: manpages refer to incorrect location (.so man3x/Xau.3x)
Bug marked as found in v
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 03:05:04AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> The current xserver-xorg package no longer Provides: the virtual 'xserver'
> package, which all xserver packages have done since time immemorial (or at
> least since sarge). As there is no mention of this in the xserver-xorg
> chang
Package: x11-common
Version: 1:7.0.11
Followup-For: Bug #362685
I encountered the same problem as Frans, except in my case I have the
following files in /usr/X11R6/bin
osiris:~# ls -l /usr/X11R6/bin/
total 8
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Apr 13 07:00 X -> ../../bin/X
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 138 Dec
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 02:58:21AM +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
> I just needed to configure an unknown monitor and tried to use your tool
> "xresprobe". Since it missed any manpage or any other documentation, I
> just called it and got asked to specify a driver. Didn't knowing how to
> do thi
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 12:32:59PM +0200, Zlatko Calusic wrote:
> Starting with Xorg 7.0, X server is not setting MTRR range register
> for framebuffer to write-combining which means that display output is
> twice slower than before (or using twice as much CPU, depending on the
> view). Everything
Package: xserver-xorg-video-ati
Version: 1:6.5.7.3-3
Severity: normal
Since I'm using xorg 7.0 instead 6.9, I cant start the xserver.
Here Xorg.0.log :
X Window System Version 7.0.0
Release Date: 21 December 2005
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 7.0
Build Operating System:Linux 2.6.8
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 357713
Bug#357713: xbase-clients: startx in xorg 7.0.4 forgets default wm & session
manager
Bug#361516: xbase-clients: Leaves files after upgrade to experimental
Bug#362122: xbase-clients: package does not contain directories within which it
co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
reopen 357713
thanks
Hi,
I just installed the new xorg packages, and the startx script still has
the wrong paths:
$ grep /usr/lib /usr/bin/startx
sysclientrc=/usr/lib/X11/xinit/xinitrc
sysserverrc=/usr/lib/X11/xinit/xserverrc
Don't know why though,
Package: x11-common
Version: 1:7.0.11
Followup-For: Bug #362672
Hello
I can confirm the problem. The problem was:
# l /usr/X11R6/bin/
./ ../ X@
(sorry, I forgot to do an "ls -l" but I hope this still helps.
bye,
-christian-
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT pre
On Sat, 2006-04-15 at 12:49 +0200, [ATR]Dj-Death wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg-video-ati
> Version: 1:6.5.7.3-3
> Severity: normal
[...]
> (**) FontPath set to
> "unix/:7100,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscale
Hi,
doing my daily upgrage on my Deb/etch I got following error today:
E: x11-common: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit
status 74
Reason found was, that dkpg/x11-common wanted to remove the non empty
directory /usr/X11R6/bin before it replaced it with just a link to
..
Package: x11-common
Version: 1:7.0.11
Severity: normal
It looks like x11-common conflicts with
xfs <= 1:1.0.1-4 , as a part of the /usr/X11R6/bin-run, but it might be
a false positive:
$ dpkg -L xfs
/.
/usr
/usr/share
/usr/share/doc
/usr/share/doc/xfs
/usr/share/doc/xfs/README.Debian
/usr/share
Package: xcursor-themes
Severity: normal
The xcursor-themes package doesn't work for me anymore.
% dpkg --list xserver-xorg libxcursor1 xcursor-themes
[...]
ii libxcursor11.1.5.2-3 X cursor management library
ii xcursor-themes 1.0.1-2Base X cursor themes
ii xserver-xorg 6.9
Hi,
if I understood the bug report correctly, all packages using xcursor should
simply be recompiled, and that is why the bug was closed? So why is
libeventdb failing to build on all arches?
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?&pkg=libeventdb
Please file or reassign whereever this FTBFS belongs to
On Fri, 2006-04-14 at 12:55 +0900, Yasushi SHOJI wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg
> Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6
> Severity: critical
>
> This happend twice on my amd64 system with radeon 7200 while using
> Firefox.
>
> Backtrace:
> 0: /usr/bin/X11/X(xf86SigHandler+0x8e) [0x449b3e]
> 1: /lib/libc.so.6 [
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 02:03:54PM +0200, Michael Prokop wrote:
> The xcursor-themes package doesn't work for me anymore.
>
> % dpkg --list xserver-xorg libxcursor1 xcursor-themes
> [...]
> ii libxcursor11.1.5.2-3 X cursor management library
> ii xcursor-themes 1.0.1-2Base X cur
Thanks for this
It turns out that I had been commenting the wrong
section in Xorg.conf- I had commented out the 'load
modules' lines when it was the module path lines that
needed to be commented out. I have corrected this and
no longer get errors about bitmap and pcmidata
modules. HOWEVER this now
On Sat, 2006-04-15 at 14:03 +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> Hi,
> if I understood the bug report correctly, all packages using xcursor should
> simply be recompiled, and that is why the bug was closed? So why is
> libeventdb failing to build on all arches?
Most likely because not all of its
On Sat, 2006-04-15 at 14:03 +0200, Michael Prokop wrote:
> Package: xcursor-themes
> Severity: normal
>
>
> The xcursor-themes package doesn't work for me anymore.
>
> % dpkg --list xserver-xorg libxcursor1 xcursor-themes
> [...]
> ii libxcursor11.1.5.2-3 X cursor management library
>
Package: libxft-dev
Version: 2.1.8.2-6
Severity: important
Please include /usr/lib/libXft.la in the installation. I use it to link into
some older applications still.
BR.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: libxrender-dev
Version: 0.9.0.2-2
Severity: important
Please include /usr/lib/libXrender.la in the installation. I use it to link into
some older applications still.
BR.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: x11-common
Version: 1:7.0.11
Severity: normal
If I reinstall x11-common (because I wronly removed the X
symlink, see e.g. bug 362685), the post-install script fails:
Setting up x11-common (7.0.11) ...
rmdir: /usr/X11R6/bin: Not a directory
x11-common postinst error: Could not remove /usr/
On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 21:16 +0200, Guillaume Melquiond wrote:
> Package: libxv1
> Version: 1:1.0.1-2
> Severity: important
>
> When playing a movie, the picture stutters a lot, as if the video frames
> were not displayed in the correct order (1,0,3,2,4,etc). Reverting the
> libxv1 package to ver
Dear X-Maintainers and X-Developers,
before I fill up the BTS I want to clarify some (security) problems
on the list.
1st problem
===
Because I am working in a secured environement, XTerm break it,
while droping the TEMP
Package: libxau-dev
Version: 1.0.0-2
Broken manpages
mandb: can't open /usr/share/man/man3x/Xau.3x: No such file or directory
mandb: warning: /usr/share/man/man3/XauGetBestAuthByAddr.3x.gz: bad symlink or
ROFF `.so' request
mandb: can't open /usr/share/man/man3x/Xau.3x: No such file or director
Le samedi 15 avril 2006 à 15:40 +0200, Michel Dänzer a écrit :
> On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 21:16 +0200, Guillaume Melquiond wrote:
> > Package: libxv1
> > Version: 1:1.0.1-2
> > Severity: important
> >
> > When playing a movie, the picture stutters a lot, as if the video frames
> > were not displayed
Hi David,
will you be able to to package XprintUtil (and XprintAppUtil) at the
same time, or would you like me to package them using a copy&paste of
what you did for libXp?
I need XprintUtil (and libXp) to compile xplsprinters.
Drew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Package: xbase-clients
Version: 7.0.0-2
Broken manpages
mandb: can't open /usr/share/man/man1x/bitmap.1x: No such file or directory
mandb: warning: /usr/share/man/man1/atobm.1x.gz: bad symlink or ROFF `.so'
request
mandb: can't open /usr/share/man/man1x/bitmap.1x: No such file or directory
mand
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 08:39:52AM +0200, Norbert Breun wrote:
> Hi,
>
> doing my daily upgrage on my Deb/etch I got following error today:
>
> E: x11-common: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit
> status 74
>
> Reason found was, that dkpg/x11-common wanted to remove the non
I had fixed this problem by shuffling a few directories around, but
upgraded to 7.0.11 and it's back again!
It does seem to be running the main xsession this time though, since it
tries to run twm (which I don't have installed) and opens some xterms and
an xclock. All the standard stuff. But it's
Package: xbase-clients
Version: 7.0.0-3
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
xbase-clients Build-Depends on ssh | rsh, which means it pulls in
openssh-server and openssh-client into the buildd chroot and generate
new host keys. Something that uses up a lot of entropy and takes a
long time on e.g. m68
Ooops. I spoke too soon - it's not running /etc/X11/Xsession at all.
/usr/bin/startx doesn't mention Xsession, and neither does
/usr/lib/X11/xinit/xinitrc. I don't remember where the Xsession was
started with the older version
--
Jon-o Addleman - http://redowl.dyndns.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Imakefile.c:39: error: Imake.tmpl: No such file or directory
is preventing kdebase from building as well. There are probably other
packages affected.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi everyone,
Mike OConner (stew on irc) started a wiki page at
http://wiki.debian.org/Xorg69To7 to document common problems with the
upgrade from 6.9 to 7.0. Note that this is mainly for bugs we can't
automatically handle, but ideally this sort of page won't be necessary once
we get the package
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 07:20:55AM -0700, C.Y.M wrote:
> mandb: can't open /usr/share/man/man1x/bitmap.1x: No such file or directory
> mandb: warning: /usr/share/man/man1/atobm.1x.gz: bad symlink or ROFF `.so'
> request
> mandb: can't open /usr/share/man/man1x/bitmap.1x: No such file or directory
Your message dated Sat, 15 Apr 2006 11:31:30 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362576: xserver-xorg: custom config breaks xorg, md5sums
not found, more deps needed.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-04-15 11:38:05 -0400 (Sat, 15 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1792
Modified:
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/control
Log:
* Move hardware autodetection stuff to Recommends rather than Depends.
Also allow discover in addition to discover1. Tha
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-04-15 11:42:41 -0400 (Sat, 15 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1793
Modified:
trunk/app/xdm-X11R7.0-1.0.1/debian/changelog
trunk/app/xdm-X11R7.0-1.0.1/debian/control
Log:
* Swap the dependency on xmessage | xbase-clients to xbase-clients |
xmessage. xmessage as a package
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-04-15 11:55:09 -0400 (Sat, 15 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1794
Modified:
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/control
Log:
* Update list of x11-common conflicts. Thanks Steve Langasek.
(closes: #362711)
Modified: trunk/debian/xorg/debian/chan
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 353356 serious
Bug#353356: xlibmesa-gl-dev: trying to overwrite `/usr/include/GL/glext.h',
which is also in package mesa-common-dev
Severity set to `serious'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debi
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-04-15 11:57:38 -0400 (Sat, 15 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1795
Modified:
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/x11-common.postinst.in
Log:
* Better document what can be done in the event that x11-common isn't empty
on upgrade. Tell people in th
Hi,
Today, "apt-get dselect-upgrade" wants to remove several packages,
e.g. "xfs", presumably due to new conflicts by xorg.
I checked for a bug report on "xfs" and found none. Have all the
maintainers of newly-uninstallable packages been notified
about this change?
Or should I file bug reports?
severity 353356 serious
thanks
See also #362063
--
++
| Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7 |
|| Fingerprint: c1f5 f24c d514 3fec 8bf6 |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROT
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-04-15 12:04:24 -0400 (Sat, 15 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1796
Modified:
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/control
Log:
* Make xserver-xorg-(input|video)-all arch: any rather than all, to let them
build properly. Thanks Eugene Konev.
Modif
Your message dated Sat, 15 Apr 2006 17:56:55 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362756: xserver-xorg-video-ati: radeon driver broken
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-04-15 12:08:39 -0400 (Sat, 15 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1797
Modified:
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog
Log:
Add closers and thanks
Modified: trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog
===
--- trunk/debian/xorg
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-04-15 12:15:38 -0400 (Sat, 15 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1798
Removed:
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/xserver-xorg.links
Modified:
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/control
Log:
build properly. Thanks Eugene Konev for the fix. Thanks Paul Wis
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-04-15 12:17:55 -0400 (Sat, 15 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1799
Modified:
trunk/lib/libfontenc-X11R7.0-1.0.1/debian/changelog
trunk/lib/libfontenc-X11R7.0-1.0.1/debian/rules
Log:
* Build with --with-encodingsdir=${datadir}/X11/fonts/encodings to account
for where we
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 11:40:38AM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Today, "apt-get dselect-upgrade" wants to remove several packages,
> e.g. "xfs", presumably due to new conflicts by xorg.
>
> I checked for a bug report on "xfs" and found none. Have all the
> maintainers of newly-uninstallable p
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-04-15 12:22:12 -0400 (Sat, 15 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1800
Modified:
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/control
Log:
* Add pgaccess to the list of packages to conflict with. Thanks Bas
Couwenberg. (closes: #362685)
Modified: trunk/debia
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-04-15 12:22:53 -0400 (Sat, 15 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1801
Modified:
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog
Log:
and Christian Hammers. Thanks to Steve Langasek for the fix.
(closes: #362713, #362672)
Modified: trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog
===
Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Because I am working in a secured environement, XTerm break it,
> while droping the TEMPDIR variable which was set from /etc/profile,
> ~/.bash_login or ~/.xsession.
>
> Generaly it is set using:
>
> mkdir -p /tmp/$USER
> chmod 700 /tmp/$USER
> expor
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 11:40:38AM -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Today, "apt-get dselect-upgrade" wants to remove several packages,
> e.g. "xfs", presumably due to new conflicts by xorg.
>
> I checked for a bug report on "xfs" and found none. Have all the
> maintainers of newly-uninst
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-04-15 12:29:21 -0400 (Sat, 15 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1802
Modified:
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/x11-common.postinst.in
Log:
and Christian Hammers. Thanks to Steve Langasek for the fix.
* Have safer and better logic for replacing
Hi, H r u? Please send new bugs in loan Information sysyem, I hope you will defenately give replay ASAP, Thanking you, Warm Regards, Sri.
Jiyo cricket on Yahoo! India cricket
Yahoo! Messenger Mobile Stay in touch with your buddies all the time.
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-04-15 12:41:53 -0400 (Sat, 15 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1803
Modified:
trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog
Log:
Add closer
Modified: trunk/debian/xorg/debian/changelog
===
--- trunk/debian/xorg/debian/chan
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.16
> severity 362678 grave
Bug#362678: xutils-dev: missing Imake.tmpl
Severity set to `grave'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.16
> severity 362686 grave
Bug#362686: xbase-clients: .xsession and .Xresources not honored
Severity set to `grave'.
> merge 362686 362069
Bug#362069: xbase-clients: xinit broken - X sess
Your message dated Sat, 15 Apr 2006 12:39:06 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362643: xserver-xorg: abnt2 keyboard broken
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Your message dated Sat, 15 Apr 2006 12:40:18 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362659: xserver-common install requirements not met?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Package: x11-common
Severity: normal
All I know is these days on sid I see:
Package x11-common has broken dep on xfree86-common
Considering xfree86-common 0 as a solution to x11-common 1611
Added xfree86-common to the remove list
Fixing x11-common via keep of xfree86-common
--
To UNSUBSCR
Your message dated Sat, 15 Apr 2006 12:38:08 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#346098: xserver-xorg: middle clicking works with xorg 7.0
packages
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Hi
i noticed the file libxrender.la is usually not provided by this
package: should i look for it in a different package or is it missing?
thanks
Attilio Fiandrotti
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.0.11
Followup-For: Bug #362672
FYI:
I figured that the X symlink was probably just a left over and not all that
important, so I tried deleting it and doing a reconfigure of the x packages.
This caused the /usr/X11R6/bin folder to be deleted and a new symlink to
Package: xdm
Version: 1:1.0.1-5
Followup-For: Bug #362149
Debian patches don't go in unless quilt is installed.
quilt was not installed even after I did 'apt-get build-dep xdm'.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Archite
Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hmm, this was supposed to have been fixed in xserver-xorg 1:7.0.11 by
> removing the symlink in question. :/ So there are two bugs here --
> xserver-xorg needs to drop the symlink, and x11-common needs to bump its
> versioned conflict with xserver-xorg...
Just to add to th
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2006-04-15 13:14:12 -0400 (Sat, 15 Apr 2006)
New Revision: 1804
Modified:
trunk/app/xdm-X11R7.0-1.0.1/debian/changelog
trunk/app/xdm-X11R7.0-1.0.1/debian/control
Log:
* Add build-depends on quilt. Thanks Peter Jordan. (closes: #362149)
Modified: trunk/app/xdm-X11R7.0-
Your message dated Sat, 15 Apr 2006 13:10:00 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362797: x11-common has broken dep on xfree86-common
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Your message dated Sat, 15 Apr 2006 10:17:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362672: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 15 Apr 2006 10:17:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362780: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 15 Apr 2006 10:17:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362713: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 15 Apr 2006 10:17:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362685: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 15 Apr 2006 10:17:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362694: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 15 Apr 2006 10:17:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362685: fixed in xorg 1:7.0.12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
1 - 100 of 169 matches
Mail list logo
