Bug#56179: sinkhole

ALERT: Third and FINAL Notification: Although you were not accepted initially, we are now happy to present you with three deals from two different brokers. Remember, there is absolutely No commitment required on your part and past credit is a non-issue. Please validate your information with ou

Bug#318319: xserver-xorg: radeon driver troubles

El Jueves, 14 de Julio de 2005 19:52, Michael Bonhomme escribió: > Package: xserver-xorg > Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-2 > Severity: important > > > Graphic card : VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon > Mobility U1 (this bug is resolved if I replace > /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/rade

Bug#320828: xserver-xorg: Sometimes crashes in ATI driver when resizing XV window

El lunes, 1 de agosto de 2005 22:00, Marcel Moreaux escribió: > The X server sometimes crashes when resizing XV windows (e.g. mplayer). > > The problem _seems_ to occur more often when mplayer is run remotely > over a ssh-tunnel; sometimes just starting mplayer remotely already > crashes the X serv

Bug#323954: updating x11-common

Package: x11-common Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 Severity: important Tags: experimental dpkg: error at /var/cache/apt/archives/x11-common_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_all.deb (--unpack) usage error: replace_conffile_with_symlink_rollback() called with wrong number of arguments; expected 2; got 1 so

Bug#323977: Can't install xlibs_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_all.deb

Package: xlibs Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 In Debian/sid I want to upgrade from 4.3.0 to xlibs_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_all.deb but get the following errors: Die folgenden Pakete werden aktualisiert: xlibs 1 aktualisiert, 0 neu installiert, 0 zu entfernen und 0 nicht aktualisiert. Es müssen noch 0B von 477k

Bug#318319: xserver-xorg: radeon driver troubles

David Martínez Moreno a écrit : >El Jueves, 14 de Julio de 2005 19:52, Michael Bonhomme escribió: > > >>Package: xserver-xorg >>Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-2 >>Severity: important >> >> >>Graphic card : VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon >>Mobility U1 (this bug is resolved if I rep

Bug#318319: xserver-xorg: radeon driver troubles

Michael Bonhomme a écrit : >David Martínez Moreno a écrit : > > > >>El Jueves, 14 de Julio de 2005 19:52, Michael Bonhomme escribió: >> >> >> >> >>>Package: xserver-xorg >>>Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-2 >>>Severity: important >>> >>> >>>Graphic card : VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies I

Bug#320828: xserver-xorg: Sometimes crashes in ATI driver when resizing XV window

On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 01:00:59PM +0200, David Mart?nez Moreno wrote: > El lunes, 1 de agosto de 2005 22:00, Marcel Moreaux escribi?: > > The X server sometimes crashes when resizing XV windows (e.g. mplayer). > > > > [...] > > > > The hardware is an ATI rage mobility P/M, using the "ati" driver >

Processed: clone

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 256376 -1 Bug#256376: procps: top segfaults, if the xterm is to small Bug 256376 cloned as bug 324001. > reassign -1 xterm Bug#324001: procps: top segfaults, if the xterm is to small Bug reassigned from package `procps' to `xterm'. > retitle -1

Bug#323994: xterm: valgrind reports overlapping memory in memcpy()

Package: xterm Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 Severity: normal Immediately after starting xterm: ==6726== Source and destination overlap in memcpy(0x1BD8A4F8, 0x1BD8A4F8, 4) ... ==6726==by 0x1BAAD617: XtVaCreateManagedWidget (in /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6.0) ==6726==by 0x8074265: (withi

Bug#324002: x-window-system-core: please depend on xserver instead of xserver-xorg

Package: x-window-system-core Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 Severity: wishlist Hello, currently, x-window-system-core depends on xserver-xorg, which denies the alternative installation of xserver-xfree86. Is this intentional? Would it instead be possible to depend on the virtual package xserver and let

Bug#323994: xterm: valgrind reports overlapping memory in memcpy()

On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 08:20:10PM +0200, Justin Pryzby wrote: > Package: xterm > Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 > Severity: normal It's a bug in libXt, not xterm. I fixed it in XFree86 source when I ANSIfy'd it over a year ago. -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.n

Processed: fixing severity

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 314990 important Bug#314990: xdm: cannot log in Severity set to `important'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To

Bug#321313: marked as done (FTBFS (unstable): cannot find -lselinux)

Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:02:17 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#323168: fixed in snmpkit 0.9-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#323168: marked as done (larswm: ftbfs [sparc] cannot find -lselinux)

Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:02:17 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#323168: fixed in snmpkit 0.9-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#320473: marked as done (isdnutils: FTBFS: Missing build depedency on libselinux1-dev.)

Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:02:17 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#323168: fixed in snmpkit 0.9-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#319121: marked as done (FTBFS: Missing build-dependency on libselinux1-dev)

Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:02:17 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#323168: fixed in snmpkit 0.9-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#319410: marked as done (imake assumes availability of selinux)

Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:02:17 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#323168: fixed in snmpkit 0.9-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#321819: marked as done (FTBFS: missing build-depends on libselinux1-dev)

Your message dated Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:02:17 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#323168: fixed in snmpkit 0.9-10 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#323168: fixed in snmpkit 0.9-10

On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 02:18:13PM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Changes: > snmpkit (0.9-10) unstable; urgency=low > . >* for some misterious reasons, the Conflict line that is in the source > did not reach the libsnmpkit2c2 deb ; so I am rebuilding it > (closes: #3231

Processed: reopening 323168

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 323168 Bug#323168: larswm: ftbfs [sparc] cannot find -lselinux Bug#319121: FTBFS: Missing build-dependency on libselinux1-dev Bug#319410: imake assumes availability of selinux Bug#320473: isdnutils: FTBFS: Missing build depedency on libselinux1-

Processed: ok, try again

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 319121 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 Bug#319121: FTBFS: Missing build-dependency on libselinux1-dev 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug#319410: imake assumes availability of selinux Bug#320473: isdnutils: FTBFS: Missing b

Bug#207832: Earn Your Degree Now

Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED], A Genuine College Degree in 2 weeks ! 1-206-350-5982 < - ccall n0ww ! Have you ever thought that the only thing stopping you from a great job and better pay was a few letters behind your name?  Well now you can get them! BA   BSc    MAMScMBA   PhD Within 2 we