notfound 247737 xserver-common/4.3.0.dfsg.1-10
found 247737 xserver-xfree86/4.3.0.dfsg.1-10
thanks
El Martes, 9 de Agosto de 2005 02:08, David Tulloh escribió:
> Package: xserver-common
> Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10
> Followup-For: Bug #247737
>
> I have the same error when using the armagetron game,
Important information regarding your loan: ID FFT9125
Hello, Your refinance application has been accepted. We are ready to give you a
loan.
After further review, our lenders have esstablished your locked rate as low as
3.45%
Please finalize everything by visiting our Secure Web-Form
http://ca
Important information regarding your loan: ID FFT6728
Hello, Your refinance application has been accepted. We are ready to give you a
loan.
After further review, our lenders have esstablished your locked rate as low as
3.45%
Please finalize everything by visiting our Secure Web-Form
http://ya
Important information regarding your loan: ID FFT9164
Hello, Your refinance application has been accepted. We are ready to give you a
loan.
After further review, our lenders have esstablished your locked rate as low as
3.45%
Please finalize everything by visiting our Secure Web-Form
http://ca
Important information regarding your loan: ID FFT2494
Hello, Your refinance application has been accepted. We are ready to give you a
loan.
After further review, our lenders have esstablished your locked rate as low as
3.45%
Please finalize everything by visiting our Secure Web-Form
http://ya
El Miércoles, 10 de Agosto de 2005 03:33, David Nusinow escribió:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 08:46:42PM +0200, Miernik wrote:
> > The Debian packages of X are made in such a way, that you cannot compile
> > only one of them, you have to recompile the whole Xorg set, which is
> > huge download of sou
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-4
Followup-For: Bug #322253
evdev have the same problem with 105-key keyboards, and
Norwegian keyboard layout. The result is that
it is impossible to type the two chaacters < and >, which makes
the unix command line difficult to use.
Running "xev" show
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 01:01:01PM +0200, David Martínez Moreno wrote:
> Not only planning, I already have a semi-clean xterm tree and I need to
> set
> up proper options for configure and check that every thing we shipped with
> X.Org is going to be shipped with latest xterm. After that,
El Miércoles, 10 de Agosto de 2005 06:10, Dale escribió:
> > Hello, Dale. First of all, why don't you use neomagic driver at all? You
> > are using VESA driver, the most generic one, commonly used when there is
> > no driver that works at all for your card.
>
> I normally do and thought I was.
Important information regarding your loan: ID FFT6516
Hello, Your refinance application has been accepted. We are ready to give you a
loan.
After further review, our lenders have esstablished your locked rate as low as
3.45%
Please finalize everything by visiting our Secure Web-Form
http://ya
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2005-08-10 10:40:22 -0500 (Wed, 10 Aug 2005)
New Revision: 515
Added:
branches/6.8.2.dfsg.1-5/
Log:
Tagging 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 release
Copied: branches/6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 (from rev 514, trunk)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
xorg-x11_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
xorg-x11_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5.dsc
xorg-x11_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5.diff.gz
pm-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_all.deb
x-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_all.deb
xfonts-100dpi_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_all.deb
xfonts-100dpi-transcoded_6.8.2.dfsg.1
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318692: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#31: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#306689: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#135768: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#258399: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#306706: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#306707: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320546: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320545: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#319121: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#306709: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318276: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318629: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318348: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318692: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318692: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Accepted:
lbxproxy_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/lbxproxy_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdmx-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdmx1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
li
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#319121: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#319121: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#319121: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#319121: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320469: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Author: branden
Date: 2005-08-10 11:00:39 -0500 (Wed, 10 Aug 2005)
New Revision: 516
Removed:
branches/6.8.2.dfsg.1-5/
Log:
Delete bogus tag.
Tags go in tags/, not branches/.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Author: branden
Date: 2005-08-10 11:01:13 -0500 (Wed, 10 Aug 2005)
New Revision: 517
Added:
tags/6.8.2.dfsg.1-5/
Log:
Tag 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 release.
Copied: tags/6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 (from rev 516, trunk)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
Author: branden
Date: 2005-08-10 11:01:39 -0500 (Wed, 10 Aug 2005)
New Revision: 518
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
Inaugurate 6.8.2.dfsg.1-6 development.
Modified: trunk/debian/changelog
===
--- trunk/debian/changelog
Author: branden
Date: 2005-08-10 11:03:31 -0500 (Wed, 10 Aug 2005)
New Revision: 519
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
(cosmetic) Fix typo in historical changelog entry.
Modified: trunk/debian/changelog
===
--- trunk/debian/c
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 11:00:43AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
wrote:
> Removed:
>branches/6.8.2.dfsg.1-5/
> Log:
> Delete bogus tag.
>
> Tags go in tags/, not branches/.
Crap. Thanks for catching that.
- David Nusinow
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Author: ender
Date: 2005-08-10 11:27:34 -0500 (Wed, 10 Aug 2005)
New Revision: 2289
Modified:
NEWS.xhtml
Log:
Added news about 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 and the backported i810 driver.
Modified: NEWS.xhtml
===
(Binary files differ)
--
To
Dainel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 07:24:12PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
>> xlibs contains more than 300 dpkg-conffiles, and moving them from one
>> package to another requires lots of manual md5summing in the
>> package maintainer scripts as dpkg does not ha
> "David M" == David Martínez Moreno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
David M> [1 ] notfound
David M> 247737 xserver-common/4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 found 247737
David M> xserver-xfree86/4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 thanks
David M> El Martes, 9 de Agosto de 2005 02:08, David Tulloh
David M> escribió
On 2005-08-07 01:15:17 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Package: xserver-xfree86
> Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14
> Severity: important
>
> I don't know if this is related to the crash: I had network problems
> (lost packets + following packets that arrived several seconds late,
> as shown by a ping). Af
I see this error too, but when I switch my profile to non utf-8, xawtv
runs. Same problem I has with motv.
Bey
--
Pavel Mlčoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
reinfection
Insiders Pick Of The Week- ORTE .Pk
Company: Oretech, Inc.
Ticker: ORTE . Pk
Current-Price: .57
52Wk High: 1. 60
Estimated 3-5 Day target: 1.10+
Estimated-6months-target: 2.32
Oretech Announces Cost Effective and Environmentally
Friendly Method of Extracting Oil from Tar Sand.
X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Modified: NEWS.xhtml
> ===
> (Binary files differ)
It would be nice if svn could be told that this is a text file, and as
such reasonable to diff conventionally.
--
Hi folks,
I'm expecting to bring Subversion services down on necrotic at some point
soon, possibly this evening.
Now that there's a known fix for bug #314381[1], I have successfully built
and used a patched Subversion 1.2.0-1 package for client-side operations
against the XSF repositories.
I now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 318162 xterm: bold text became incredibly ugly after upgrading to
> X.Org
Bug#318162: xterm bold text became incredibly ugly after upgrading to x.org
Changed Bug title.
(By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.)
> retitle 318513 xterm
OK, changed to this:
$ grep -i ddc XF86Config
# Load"ddc"
Option "NoDDCValue" "true"
P.S., but why still loading and reloading, even though I commented it out above?
# grep -i ddc /var/log/XFree86.0.log
(**) VIA(0): Option "NoDDCValue" "true"
(**) VIA(0): Option: Not using DDC pro
I also have a local multi-user setup like Helge and use evdev for that
reason. However I didn't know about the evdev keyboard driver before
and always modified the XFree86 source package with another patch for
my second keyboard. I started using the evdev driver when I upgraded
to X.Org. I send thi
Package: x11-common
Followup-For: Bug #322284
Apparently dbus has provided a session bus for X since Feb of 2004, as
detailed in:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-changes/2004/02/msg00194.html
Anyone know whether Debian's xorg is suddenly going to inherit a dbus
dependency? It'd be a show-s
Hello Porfirio ,
Would you like at least $1500.00 to $3500.00 per day just for returning phone
calls?
I do! If you have a telephone and can return calls you are fully qualified for
this program.
Give Us A Call 800-671-9012
convivial gateway compressible horatio mossy sieglinda anselm mal
Hello Mariano ,
Would you like at least $1500.00 to $3500.00 per day just for returning phone
calls?
I do! If you have a telephone and can return calls you are fully qualified for
this program.
Give Us A Call 800-671-9012
algeria artificial bradbury fealty larkin quadrature carcinoma ilyu
Hello Tanner ,
Would you like at least $1500.00 to $3500.00 per day just for returning phone
calls?
I do! If you have a telephone and can return calls you are fully qualified for
this program.
Give Us A Call 800-671-9012
choctaw jam nearest salient amra target werther coverlet denunciate
Hello Matilda ,
Would you like at least $1500.00 to $3500.00 per day just for returning phone
calls?
I do! If you have a telephone and can return calls you are fully qualified for
this program.
Give Us A Call 800-671-9012
arbitrage bladdernut desperate albrecht affair billiken cola glans
Hello Gena ,
Would you like at least $1500.00 to $3500.00 per day just for returning phone
calls?
I do! If you have a telephone and can return calls you are fully qualified for
this program.
Give Us A Call 800-671-9012
brow scrounge swarthy haven jacobian ordnance option parentheses taffy
Hello Josefina ,
Would you like at least $1500.00 to $3500.00 per day just for returning phone
calls?
I do! If you have a telephone and can return calls you are fully qualified for
this program.
Give Us A Call 800-671-9012
pent judicable amos bedspread spoilage repository scion bloodstai
Hello Millie ,
Would you like at least $1500.00 to $3500.00 per day just for returning phone
calls?
I do! If you have a telephone and can return calls you are fully qualified for
this program.
Give Us A Call 800-671-9012
hippocrates cortland gallant bushnell jehovah alginate incredulous
58 matches
Mail list logo
