Re: X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r1880 - trunk/debian

X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin wrote: > +* Add Debian-specific patch to uxterm to call validlocale(8) before trying to > + launch xterm, per recommendation from Recai Oktas. If a valid locale isn't > + set, bail out (would resolve #246398). (This patch would be > Debian-specific > + beca

Processed: tagging 252873

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.4 > # fixed in Debian X Strike Force XFree86 repository; to view, run "svn diff > -r 1880:1881 svn://necrotic.deadbeast.net/xfree86" > tags 252873 + pending Bug#252873: xterm: cursor col

X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r1883 - branches/debconf-overhaul/debian

Author: branden Date: 2004-09-28 00:47:50 -0500 (Tue, 28 Sep 2004) New Revision: 1883 Modified: branches/debconf-overhaul/debian/TODO Log: Add items. Modified: branches/debconf-overhaul/debian/TODO === --- branches/debconf-overha

X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r1884 - branches/debconf-overhaul/debian

Author: branden Date: 2004-09-28 00:57:01 -0500 (Tue, 28 Sep 2004) New Revision: 1884 Modified: branches/debconf-overhaul/debian/CHANGESETS branches/debconf-overhaul/debian/xserver-xfree86.config.in branches/debconf-overhaul/debian/xserver-xfree86.templates Log: Add new function get_mouse

Re: mouse for x

On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 11:28:31PM -0700, Brad Boyer wrote: > The only type of mouse on a 68k mac is ADB, and the entire ADB layer > got converted over to use the generic input system for 2.4. The old > adbmouse driver doesn't even exist in the tree in 2.6, but it was > still possible to compile it

X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r1885 - trunk/debian

Author: branden Date: 2004-09-28 01:12:42 -0500 (Tue, 28 Sep 2004) New Revision: 1885 Modified: trunk/debian/TODO Log: Fix ass-backwards language in item. Modified: trunk/debian/TODO === --- trunk/debian/TODO 2004-09-28 05:57:0

xf86xv.c patch

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mr Rebe, my apologixes for taking some of your time, but we (as Debian project) are in the need to know under which nature (copyright and licence) the patches you submitted to Xfree86 have been released, for the following related CVS commit, in or

Re: xf86xv.c patch

Hi Fabio, Mr Rebe, my apologixes for taking some of your time, but we (as Debian project) are in the need to know under which nature (copyright and licence) the patches you submitted to Xfree86 have been released, for the following related CVS commit, in order to be able to import the fix in

Re: xf86xv.c patch

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Rene, René Rebe wrote: | Hi Fabio, | |> Mr Rebe, |> my apologixes for taking some of your time, but we (as Debian |> project) |> are in the need to know under which nature (copyright and licence) the |> patches you submitted to Xfree86 have be

X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r1886 - in trunk/debian: . patches

Author: fabbione Date: 2004-09-28 06:06:09 -0500 (Tue, 28 Sep 2004) New Revision: 1886 Modified: trunk/debian/CHANGESETS trunk/debian/TODO trunk/debian/patches/000_stolen_from_HEAD.diff Log: Add patch copyright/licence paragraph from upstream (Rene Rebe). Modified: trunk/debian/CHANGESE

X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r1887 - trunk/debian

Author: fabbione Date: 2004-09-28 06:07:27 -0500 (Tue, 28 Sep 2004) New Revision: 1887 Modified: trunk/debian/CHANGESETS Log: Fix wrong changeset number. Modified: trunk/debian/CHANGESETS === --- trunk/debian/CHANGESETS 2004-

Incomplete upload found in Debian upload queue

Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in the Debian upload queue directory: xfree86_4.3.0.dfsg.1-8.diff.gz xfree86_4.3.0.dfsg.1-8.dsc This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job cannot be processed. If no .changes file arrives within 23:24:29, the fil

Bug#260598: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#260598: Pointer background not updated for i740 X server)

Hello, Sorry for being unresponsive. Since I have a new laptop, I don't really use the other computer at all anymore, so I couldn't do much testing. Anyway, it has been behaving weird, so I'm thinking it might be a hardware problem. Especially if nobody else experiences it. Thanks, Bas De

Processing of xfree86_4.3.0.dfsg.1-8_i386.changes

xfree86_4.3.0.dfsg.1-8_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: xfree86_4.3.0.dfsg.1-8.dsc xfree86_4.3.0.dfsg.1-8.diff.gz pm-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-8_all.deb x-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-8_all.deb xfonts-100dpi_4.3.0.dfsg.1-8_all.deb xfonts-100dpi-transcoded_4.3.0.dfsg.1-8_

Accepted xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 (i386 source all)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:14:12 +0200 Source: xfree86 Binary: libx11-6-dbg libxtst6-dbg xserver-common xlibs-static-dev libxp6-dbg xbase-clients xlibmesa3-dbg libxtrap6-dbg xfonts-75dpi libxt6 libice6-dbg xmh libxaw6-dbg x-dev libxv1 libx

Bug#252895: xbase-clients apps crash

I have the same problem with every app from xbase-clients package that needs to display some font (xmessage, xfontsel, xcalc, etc.). They hang immediately after launching: $ xcalc X Error of failed request: BadValue (integer parameter out of range for operation) Major opcode of failed request:

xfree86_4.3.0.dfsg.1-8_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: lbxproxy_4.3.0.dfsg.1-8_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/lbxproxy_4.3.0.dfsg.1-8_i386.deb libdps-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-8_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-8_i386.deb libdps1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-8_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-8_i386.deb libdp

Bug#273516: marked as done ([l10n] Updated Czech translation of XFree86 debconf messages)

Your message dated Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:47:51 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#273516: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#272493: marked as done (libxpm4: Three exploitable overflows in XPM handling)

Your message dated Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:47:51 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#272493: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#271071: marked as done (xserver-xfree86 : nv_drv.o cause screen corruption)

Your message dated Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:47:51 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#271071: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#270810: marked as done (/etc/X11/xkb/rules/xfree86 does not list all old layout files)

Your message dated Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:47:51 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#270810: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#270714: marked as done (Video not working with XVideo)

Your message dated Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:47:51 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#270714: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#268759: marked as done ([nv] Sarge xserver-xfree86 breaks display)

Your message dated Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:47:51 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#268759: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#259740: marked as done (xlibs: Windows key no longer treated as modifer, just as Super_L)

Your message dated Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:47:51 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#259740: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#252873: marked as done (xterm: cursor color uses colors of previous character cell, not the current one)

Your message dated Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:47:51 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#252873: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#247463: marked as done (xlibs: hu_US needs to be listed in xfree86 rules file's 'oldlayouts')

Your message dated Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:47:50 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#247463: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#234085: marked as done (xlibs: [xkb] aring, oslash, and ae keys don't work on Danish Happy Hacking keyboard)

Your message dated Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:47:50 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#234085: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#271326: marked as done (Please add a multi-layout version of us_intl)

Your message dated Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:47:51 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#271326: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#271259: marked as done (xlibs: wrong altwin options listed in /etc/X11/xkb/rules/xfree86.lst)

Your message dated Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:47:51 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#271259: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#269025: marked as done (xserver-xfree86: nv driver from svn trunk doesn't work properly)

Your message dated Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:47:51 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#269025: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#260471: marked as done (xterm: text cursor sometimes retains color of previous position)

Your message dated Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:47:51 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#252873: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#270228: marked as done ([nv] GeForce FX 5200 Ultra DVI output messed up)

Your message dated Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:47:51 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#270228: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#271235: marked as done (xserver-xfree86: [nv] XVideo fails silently (but visually) in mplayer)

Your message dated Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:47:51 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#270714: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r1889 - tags

Author: branden Date: 2004-09-28 11:43:25 -0500 (Tue, 28 Sep 2004) New Revision: 1889 Added: tags/4.3.0.dfsg.1-8/ Log: Tag 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 release (per Fabio's request). Copied: tags/4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 (from rev 1888, branches/4.3.0/sid)

X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r1890 - trunk/debian

Author: branden Date: 2004-09-28 12:04:05 -0500 (Tue, 28 Sep 2004) New Revision: 1890 Modified: trunk/debian/changelog Log: Merge 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8's final changelog entry from branches/4.3.0/sid (r1870, r1888). Modified: trunk/debian/changelog ===

X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r1891 - branches/4.3.0/sid/debian

Author: branden Date: 2004-09-28 12:14:09 -0500 (Tue, 28 Sep 2004) New Revision: 1891 Modified: branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/README Log: Merge r1439 from trunk, which somehow had been overlooked before. Fortunately, it is just a very minor cosmetic fix to the source package's README file. Modifi

X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r1892 - trunk/debian

Author: branden Date: 2004-09-28 12:17:38 -0500 (Tue, 28 Sep 2004) New Revision: 1892 Modified: trunk/debian/CHANGESETS trunk/debian/changelog Log: Inaugurate post-4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 development. Modified: trunk/debian/CHANGESETS

X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r1893 - /

Author: branden Date: 2004-09-28 12:24:12 -0500 (Tue, 28 Sep 2004) New Revision: 1893 Modified: NEWS.xhtml Log: Add item announcing release of 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8. Modified: NEWS.xhtml === --- NEWS.xhtml 2004-09-28 17:17:38 UTC (rev

X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r1894 - /

Author: branden Date: 2004-09-28 12:51:34 -0500 (Tue, 28 Sep 2004) New Revision: 1894 Modified: HACKING Log: Add "Release Checklist" section. Modified: HACKING === --- HACKING 2004-09-28 17:24:12 UTC (rev 1893) +++ HACKING

X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r1895 - /

Author: branden Date: 2004-09-28 13:01:56 -0500 (Tue, 28 Sep 2004) New Revision: 1895 Modified: HACKING Log: Add a step to the release checklist. Modified: HACKING === --- HACKING 2004-09-28 17:51:34 UTC (rev 1894) +++ HACKIN

Bug#236198: This is an alert from eSafe

*** eSafe detected hostile content in this email. *** Time: 28 Sep 2004 10:54:36 Scan result: Mail rejected Protocol: SMTP in File Name\Mail Subject: mail_1096366102: Mail Delivery (failure [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Source: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Destination: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Details: Mail infected with x

Re: Fresh installation: Keymap broken under X

[Adding -boot and -x to CC list. Sorry for the crossposting. Perhaps this can move away from -devel.] On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 08:37:04AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > (Joeyh, Kostas, Branden keyboard issues with X when using non-US > keyboard...see -devel and bugs 238778 239827 242321 242605

Re: Fresh installation: Keymap broken under X

> If I feel myself getting bogged down, I might do this: > > * If the answer to d-i/keymap is whatever the value for a typical US PC > keyboard is, leave the question priority at medium. > * Otherwise, kick the priority up to high. > > It makes the install more interactive, which people don't

Bug#252895: /usr/X11R6/bin/xfontsel: [xfontsel] crash

Hi, Branden, Hallo, Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Let's try to nail down if these are all really the same problem. > > Mr. Schaber, Mr. Girault: > > Does the problem go away if you invoke xfontsel as follows?: > > LC_ALL=C xfontsel Seems not the case: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$

Bug#256475: Acknowledgement (xserver-xfree86: [i810] Need to use external program to get a sharp 1400x1050 resolution)

An upload for this "program" can be gotten at: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/apoirier/ The program has now a public domain license. Cheers, -- Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalmente

Bug#165146: Yes, if the business Debt is an extension of debt you may be able to eliminate it

Bring to a standstill the annoying letters and calls. We have pioneered an advanced system of proven strategies that will get the creditors and debt collectors off your back for good Our debt termination program has legally stopped millions of dollars worth of debt from being collected. check o