On Mon, 30 Aug 2004, Denis Barbier wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 02:30:32AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
> wrote:
> > Author: fabbione
> > Date: 2004-08-30 02:30:28 -0500 (Mon, 30 Aug 2004)
> > New Revision: 1762
> >
> > Modified:
> >trunk/debian/CHANGESETS
> >trunk/debia
Adding this patch:
--- xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/common/xf86Priv.h2004-08-31
15:50:38.0 +1000
+++ xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/common/xf86Priv.h2004-08-31
15:49:51.0 +1000
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@
#define DEFAULT_LOG_VERBOSE3
#endif
#ifndef DEFAULT_DPI
-#define DEF
Author: branden
Date: 2004-08-31 01:36:29 -0500 (Tue, 31 Aug 2004)
New Revision: 1776
Modified:
trunk/debian/CHANGESETS
trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
Add bug-closer to historical changelog entry.
Modified: trunk/debian/CHANGESETS
==
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.4
> severity 257515 wishlist
Bug#257515: xserver-xfree86: [debconf] keyboard layout template should tell
U.K. users to use 'gb'
Severity set to `wishlist'.
> merge 133344 257515
Bug#1333
Your message dated Tue, 31 Aug 2004 01:38:45 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing old fixed bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Today is a new day for your residence. With levels
at their headline-making historic lows, our programs
are better now than ever before. Even if you've recently
closed on a property, now is the time to check your
numbers.
Our advisors are here to help you decide your options.
In fact, did you
No comment?
I have tried to do some debugging and anlysis - am I on the right track?
Thanks :)
David
David Greaves wrote:
Hi
I have a problem with get_rotate_fontname() in omGeneric.c.
I think there's a bug there.
I'm using libx11-6[-dbg] 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6
Line 561:
for(field_num = 0 ; fie
I'm still seeing this bug with XFree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6ubuntu11 (synced to
SVN trunk @ r1777). Fabio M. Di Nitto told me to follow up as this
should have been fixed.
I have a normal British "Windows" keyboard with the Windows/Menu keys,
configured like this:
Section "InputDevice"
Identifie
The most interesting information from your log file /var/log/XFree86.0.log
is
"Couldn't load XKB keymap, falling back to pre-XKB keymap"
I had the same problem and could solve it by installing the xlibs package.
Though the description of xlibs says that you don't need that package for
Debian 3
Hello X Strike Force,
Pursuing to a previous thread, I reported a wishlist item
against pciutils asking for an option for lspci for XF86Config
style output:
Remco van de Meent has implemented it in 1:2.1.11-13.
Now lspci -X output:
PCI:0:20:0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rag
REALLY need those cd’s ( J) !! (windows xp & photoshop
Now ,I’m getting “page
expired” & when I got thru to THIS page…couldn’t find the
faq list.
Just let me know if you have all the info you need.
Nan Guardineer 3246 Casa Grande Dr.
San Ramon, CA. 94583 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
925-829-513
Author: branden
Date: 2004-08-31 14:02:35 -0500 (Tue, 31 Aug 2004)
New Revision: 1778
Modified:
branches/debconf-overhaul/debian/changelog
Log:
Add bug-closer.
Modified: branches/debconf-overhaul/debian/changelog
===
--- branches
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 253607 xserver-xfree86: [debconf] don't set monitor sync ranges in
> config file at all; just rely on DDC/EDID to work
Bug#253607: xserver-xfree86: (debconf) X >4.3.0 is perfectly capable of
detecting monitor resolutions, debconf should ask on
Your message dated Tue, 31 Aug 2004 14:38:54 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Processed: Re: Bug#130191: xserver-xfree86: debconf BusID
question could have better default and explanation
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
retitle 253607 xserver-xfree86: [debconf] don't set monitor sync ranges in
config file at all; just rely on DDC/EDID to work
severity 253607 wishlist
thanks
> Like said, since XFree 4.3.0, Xfree, at least on the graphic drivers
> that support it, is capable to run without monitor timings, and abl
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 02:39:45PM +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
[...]
> When I go to the GNOME keybindings applet to configure a super-key
> combination, when I press the super key it doesn't wait for a key along
> with the modifier, but stops at "Super_L". If I use Meta it waits for
> me to hit anot
Author: branden
Date: 2004-08-31 16:39:08 -0500 (Tue, 31 Aug 2004)
New Revision: 1779
Modified:
branches/debconf-overhaul/debian/TODO
Log:
Add sub-items.
Modified: branches/debconf-overhaul/debian/TODO
===
--- branches/debconf-ov
On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 12:08:07PM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
[...]
> Interestingly, I had thought that the absence of Alt_R in mod2 was the
> problem with the Dvorak/switched layout. But it's also missing in the
> default US/no switch layout, in which right Alt works just fine...
>
> FYI, in
Author: branden
Date: 2004-08-31 17:26:23 -0500 (Tue, 31 Aug 2004)
New Revision: 1780
Modified:
branches/debconf-overhaul/debian/CHANGESETS
branches/debconf-overhaul/debian/changelog
branches/debconf-overhaul/debian/xserver-xfree86.config.in
branches/debconf-overhaul/debian/xserver-xfr
Your message dated Wed, 1 Sep 2004 00:48:38 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#234082: xbase-clients: [xkb] can't switch vt's when
-compat group_led is set
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Believe it or not, I have tried several sites to b"-"uy presription
medication. I should say that currently you are still be the best amony
them. Gary M. --PA
Cqd http://vrnu.o.gait1492pinn.com/f74m/
d^r'ugs from u,s.a & 0v^ernight d-e-liver
`Have you found Heathcliff, you ass?' interru`pted
Your message dated Wed, 1 Sep 2004 00:53:26 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#234530: setxkbmap -layout "us,lt" assigns Alt_R to
modifiers Mod1 and Mod5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Author: branden
Date: 2004-08-31 18:45:40 -0500 (Tue, 31 Aug 2004)
New Revision: 1781
Modified:
branches/debconf-overhaul/debian/CHANGESETS
branches/debconf-overhaul/debian/TODO
branches/debconf-overhaul/debian/changelog
branches/debconf-overhaul/debian/xserver-xfree86.config.in
Log:
A
On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 18:08, Denis Barbier wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 12:08:07PM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> [...]
> > Interestingly, I had thought that the absence of Alt_R in mod2 was the
> > problem with the Dvorak/switched layout. But it's also missing in the
> > default US/no switc
Author: branden
Date: 2004-08-31 19:03:28 -0500 (Tue, 31 Aug 2004)
New Revision: 1782
Modified:
branches/debconf-overhaul/debian/CHANGESETS
branches/debconf-overhaul/debian/TODO
branches/debconf-overhaul/debian/changelog
branches/debconf-overhaul/debian/xserver-xfree86.config.in
Log:
M
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 02:32:49PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> retitle 253607 xserver-xfree86: [debconf] don't set monitor sync ranges in
> config file at all; just rely on DDC/EDID to work
> severity 253607 wishlist
> thanks
>
> > Like said, since XFree 4.3.0, Xfree, at least on the graphic
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 02:32:49PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Yes, "somehow". You don't provide any code, or anything beyond the barest
> sketch of a design really, so this is going to have to wait until after
> sarge.
http://www.google.com/search?q=ddcprobe+source
--
Daniel Stone
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 02:32:49PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> My only concern about that approach is we'd better be damn sure starting X
> doesn't lock up people's machines, especially on our more exotic
> architectures. discover and mdetect don't, and read-edid only seems to
> hurt x86 user
28 matches
Mail list logo
