Package: xbase-clients
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1
Severity: minor
File: /usr/X11R6/bin/xev
I discovered that xev has an -id option, which I hoped I could use to
debug the behavior of an application by recording the exact events it
received. However, when I run it on, say, an xterm, I don't get any
B
Author: branden
Date: 2004-06-02 01:11:52 -0500 (Wed, 02 Jun 2004)
New Revision: 1501
Modified:
trunk/debian/CHANGESETS
trunk/debian/po/templates.pot
Log:
Revert templates.pot to use nonsense string for file's character set
encoding; accurately identifying it as UTF-8 provokes a bug in po-de
Your message dated Wed, 2 Jun 2004 01:54:06 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#250629: xlibs: AltGr stopped working
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
[I don't know that Joey Hess really needs to be CCed on this, so I have
removed him from the headers.]
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 10:46:46AM +0200, Elrond wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 02:03:52AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Approximately 19% of the file is a list of changes. The remainder
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 06:01:54PM +0200, Sebastian Henschel wrote:
> * Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-31 19:13 +0200]:
> > All you'll need is this for configuration.
> >
> > XkbRulesxfree86
> > XkbModelmacintosh
> > XkbLayout gb
> >
> > I realized that U.K. Macintosh peo
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 03:10:27PM +0200, Daniel wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 02:27:38AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > You're exaggerating my position. In fact I'm tempted to agree with you;
> > the main problem is that the XF86Config-4 file doesn't supposrt a "DPI"
> > configuration opti
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 252201 patch sid upstream
Bug#252201: crashes when starting xine
Tags were: sid
Tags added: patch, sid, upstream
> merge 252201 251307
Bug#251307: xserver-xfree86: [ati/atimisc] XVideo apps crash X server;
complaints of unresolved symbol xf86XVCo
hello...
* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-02 09:02 +0200]:
> On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 06:01:54PM +0200, Sebastian Henschel wrote:
> > * Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-31 19:13 +0200]:
> > > All you'll need is this for configuration.
> > >
> > > XkbRules xfree86
> > >
tags 252201 patch sid upstream
merge 252201 251307
retitle 252201 xserver-xfree86: [ati/atimisc] XVideo apps crash X server;
complaints of unresolved symbol xf86XVCopyYUV12ToPacked on 3D Rage LT Pro
thanks
On 2004-06-02 Martin Wuertele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: xserver-xfree86
> Versi
Author: branden
Date: 2004-06-02 03:02:25 -0500 (Wed, 02 Jun 2004)
New Revision: 1502
Modified:
trunk/debian/CHANGESETS
trunk/debian/patches/000_stolen_from_HEAD.diff
Log:
(cosmetic) Fix silly garbage in diff header.
Modified: trunk/debian/CHANGESETS
===
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> # I didn't backport everything I should have.
> tags 251307 + fixed-upstream
Bug#251307: xserver-xfree86: [ati/atimisc] XVideo apps crash X server;
complaints of unresolved symbol
Author: branden
Date: 2004-06-02 03:45:31 -0500 (Wed, 02 Jun 2004)
New Revision: 1503
Added:
trunk/debian/patches/009_ati_r128_retry_idle_until_timeout.diff
Modified:
trunk/debian/CHANGESETS
trunk/debian/TODO
trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
Attempt to mitigate serious DRI performance probl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> # fixed in Debian X Strike Force XFree86 repository; to view, run "svn diff
> -r 1502:1503 svn://necrotic.deadbeast.net/xfree86"
> tags 223089 + pending
Bug#223089: xserver-xfree8
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 02:06:03PM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > * #251307: xserver-xfree86: [ati/atimisc] XVideo apps crash X server;
> > complaints
> >of unresolved symbol xf86XVCopyYUV12ToPacked on 3D Rage IIC AGP rev 122
> >Mich
On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 10:04:05PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> This lists code by David Dawes which is not in the 'sanitized' tree prepared
> by Branden, but is in the x.org tree. This would be the code with potential
> X-Oz/XFree86 1.1 license issues.
I've sent this on to the freedesktop.or
On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 09:34:12PM -0700, John Gilmore wrote:
> The Debian X FAQ is conspicuously silent about the whole X licensing
> issue.
This is due more to inertia on my part than anything else.
> It does mention X.Org but its commentary dates from 1999,
> saying that X.Org supervised the X
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 11:28:41PM +0100, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> Branden Robinson writes:
> > Please run the attached shell script and mail the output to:
>
> Done. Um, it appears to be buggy...
Sorry. I've now attached a version that should work.
--
G. Branden Robinson|N
On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 10:27:52PM -0700, William Ballard wrote:
> Is Debian going to switch to X.org?
>
> This Slashdot article says Slackware is:
> http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/05/31/2317246&mode=nested&tid=104&tid=106&tid=185&tid=189
>
> Ananamous Coward writes "Some big distros had a
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 02:16:11PM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> > +In general, Debconf template translations may be incorporated without being
> > +scheduled. However, the package release manager can put an explicit
> > freeze on
> > +those by marking the package version section accordi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> tags 249022 + moreinfo
Bug#249022: monitor sync rates misdetected
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> retitle 249022 xserver-xfree86: monitor sync rates misdetected on Dell
> Latitude 800
Bug#249022: monitor sync rates misdetected
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping proc
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 02:53:28PM -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> According to the information I have seen, this bug probably does not affect
> woody, but I would appreciate confirmation, and to bring it to your
> attention for unstable:
>
> http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1376
> http://ww
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 07:01:20PM +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> Hello,
> here at work we have several alphas (XP1000) which have the same
> graphics board. They also run woody. Is there any sense to check if
> the error is reproducible or, given the age of woody, should this bug
> be closed (or
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 02:32:06AM +0200, Filip Sneppe wrote:
> This is a "me too" shout on this bug report. My AltGr also stopped
> working after an upgrade.
>
> I normally run testing, but after finding out about #250629, I
> tried to dpkg --purge --force-depends xlibs and then remove
> everythi
Package: xterm
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2
Severity: normal
there is a line in /etc/X11/app-defaults/XTerm
# Debian package customizations follow.
its meant as a comment, but instead is a preprocessor directive;
comments start with !
regards,
peter
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testin
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Instead we can try to be slightly more proactive in this direction,
> > asking translators to keep an eye on trunk when there are changes to
> > templates. I used this approch for apache and it worked quite well.
>
> Yes. I'd like to hold off the pu
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 02:06:03PM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> > On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > * #251307: xserver-xfree86: [ati/atimisc] XVideo apps crash X server;
> > > complaints
> > >of unresolved symbol xf86XVC
Am Di, den 01.06.2004 schrieb Zephaniah E. Hull um 16:20:
> On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 03:44:36AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 09:55:58PM +0200, Sebastian Kapfer wrote:
> > > CC'ing Zephaniah E. Hull, who seems to be the person who contributed the
> > > patch in question.
Helge Kreutzmann,
1) I don't appreciate being characterized as a spammer by your ISP.
2) I don't appreciate received SEVEN (and counting...) bounces for the
same message from your ISP, each of which claims I am a spammer.
3) It's good to see that clues are plentiful at your ISP, which happens
Package: xdm
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1
Hello,
i am not able to login local using xdm. With kdm everything works fine. I
think there ist some problem verifying the passwort, because
my /var/log/auth.log says:
Jun 2 19:19:03 hermes : (pam_unix) authentication failure; logname=
uid=0 euid=0
Hi Branden,
I just finished debugging a very similar issue to bug 251690, where the
preinst of xserver-xfree86 failed with exit code 127. As in the
submitter's case, there was no useful debugging output, even with variables
DEBUG_XFREE86_PACKAGE=true and DEBIAN_FRONTEND=readline
exported as you r
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 01:51:57AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> [I don't know that Joey Hess really needs to be CCed on this, so I have
Some year ago or so, the submitter of a bug didn't get mail
for [EMAIL PROTECTED], might have changed, not to
mention, that this mail isn't terribly relevant
Branden Robinson wrote:
> This leaves a few questions open:
>
> A) What does David Dawes regard as "attribution to [him]"?[1] If the
>responsibility for the CVS commit is attributed to him, as it appears
>to be in several of the above, does he consider the XFree86 1.1
>license to att
Action Taken:
The attachment was quarantined from the message and replaced with
a text file informing the recipient of the action taken. The infected
attachment
has been placed in the designated quarantine folder.
Please exercise extreme caution when handling the quarantined attachment
To:
[EMAIL
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4
Severity: normal
when trying to install xserver-xfree86 from .deb I get this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/cache/apt/archives$ dpkg -i -D777
xserver-xfree86_4.3.0.dfsg.1-4_i386.deb
dpkg: requested operation requires superuser privilege
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/
Hi
guys,
I
guess this is an FAQ, but here I go anyway.
After
several tries, I have successfully installed debian ‘Sarge’ on my Toshiba Satellite laptop.
The
problem I have is that it is not using the whole screen. I mean, the screen
displayed is too small and I have a black fr
Author: branden
Date: 2004-06-02 23:15:26 -0500 (Wed, 02 Jun 2004)
New Revision: 1504
Modified:
trunk/debian/CHANGESETS
trunk/debian/TODO
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/patches/000_stolen_from_HEAD.diff
Log:
Grab missing part of updated XVideo (Xv) server-side implementation from
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> # fixed in Debian X Strike Force XFree86 repository; to view, run "svn diff
> -r 1503:1504 svn://necrotic.deadbeast.net/xfree86"
> tags 251307 + pending
Bug#251307: xserver-xfree8
38 matches
Mail list logo
