Bug#249399: xserver-common: drm with ati128 doesn't work reliably anymore

Package: xserver-common Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 Severity: normal Since a few days now I'm having dire problems with X11 and my ati128 card: X starts up, after some time it crashes with: May 17 09:47:58 shawarma kernel: [drm:r128_cce_indirect] *ERROR* reusing indirect: start=0x0 actual=0x108 May

Re: X11R6.7

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 El Martes, 13 de Abril de 2004 22:59, Keith Packard escribió: > Around 15 o'clock on Apr 13, Branden Robinson wrote: > > I think it might be easier to transition our developers and users if we > > packaged the X.Org monolithic tree, adding stuff from m

Bug#249154: Slow start time of many applications after X upgrade.

On Sat, 2004-05-15 at 15:05, Axel Grau wrote: > > After upgrading X from 4.3.0-7 many applications > (kde/gnome programs, mozilla) take a very long time to > start. Others (xemacs, xfig, xmms) work fine. I can't > find any useful information in the logs. > Downgrading to 4.3.0-7 didn't solve the p

Re: X11R6.7

On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 12:32:36PM +0200, David Mart?nez Moreno wrote: > El Martes, 13 de Abril de 2004 22:59, Keith Packard escribi?: > > Around 15 o'clock on Apr 13, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > I think it might be easier to transition our developers and users if we > > > packaged the X.Org mono

Freedom at last

Thank you for your mor tg age application, which we received yesterday. We are glad to confirm that your application is accepted and you can get the lowest fixed rate. Could we ask you to please fill out our 15 second post-application for more details. http://esecurefinance.com/?partid=savin

Bug#249154: [Fwd: Re: Bug#249154: Slow start time of many applications after X upgrade.]

-- Earthling Michel Dänzer | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer Libre software enthusiast| http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer --- Begin Message --- --- Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:lem. > Could be a duplicate of bug #242664? Running fc-cache solved the problem.

Bug#249447: xserver-xfree86: Problem when upgrading from 4.3.0-7 to 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 on Unstable

Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: 4.3.0-7 Severity: normal Getting the error bellow when updating xserver-xfree86 Setting up xserver-xfree86 (4.3.0-7) ... dpkg: error processing xserver-xfree86 (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 127 dpkg: dependency probl

Attention, Get CSRZ Immediately Monday

+ HOT STOCK FOR MONDAY MORNING May 17th, 2004 CSRZ.PK IS EXPECTED TO EXPLODE, GET IT IMMEDIATELY! + Our last profitable offers: > DCZ - we profiled at 60 cents and it went to $1.20

Re: lots of problems with X after upgrade

On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 12:21:23PM +0200, Roberto Lumbreras wrote: > Well... I managed to solve all problems: fc-cache was hanging in fonts > from the gsfonts package, so I purged it, then all started to work. > Then, I reinstalled gsfonts, and it still works. > > All of this is very very weak, is

Bug#233653: xlibmesa-gl-dev conflicts with itself

On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 09:51:05AM +0200, David Riebenbauer wrote: > The problem is afaik that xlibmesa-gl-dev provides libgl-dev _and_ > also collides with libgl-dev at the same time. > It collides with itself, which may confuse apt. > > Or should this be possible ad this is a bug in apt? Should

X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r1407 - trunk/debian

Author: branden Date: 2004-05-17 12:43:58 -0500 (Mon, 17 May 2004) New Revision: 1407 Modified: trunk/debian/TODO Log: Delete item because there is no exactly corresponding fix in XFree86 CVS to obtain. Modified: trunk/debian/TODO ==

ATI and SiS users: please test SVN trunk

Some large changes have been incorporated into the XSF XFree86 SVN trunk recently: Grab updated XFree86 X server I2C code from XFree86 CVS as of 2003-08-29. Implements and exposes xf86I2CGetScreenBuses() function. This aids in backporting updated drivers that use this function (e.g., ati/at

X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r1409 - trunk/debian

Author: branden Date: 2004-05-17 13:23:46 -0500 (Mon, 17 May 2004) New Revision: 1409 Modified: trunk/debian/TODO Log: Move item up in the priority list. Modified: trunk/debian/TODO === --- trunk/debian/TODO 2004-05-17 17:55:10

Bug#249025: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=249025

> Debian Bug report logs - #249025 > xterm: crashes when X-resource XTerm*openIm set to false This is fixed in xterm patch #189. -- Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net

Bug#249502: sis_drv.so is not included

Package: xlibmesa-dri Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 Severity: normal Hello, I don't know if it's intentional or not, but the driver for SIS chipsets is not included in the package, although it seems to exist upstream. Bye, Enrico -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers

Re: disciplinarian

New unique offer! You can get 0% mor`tgage  ra'te for this week only! 0% means ZER0. No percent at all!!! Can you find the better offers? Minimum info required. Up to $ 1,000,000 1oan available. 0nly 3 days left! Refi.nance or Buy a home of your dr.eam now! ktsnstbs xsoawfii qzmptetow hemdrd

X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r1410 - in trunk/debian: . patches

Author: branden Date: 2004-05-17 17:03:45 -0500 (Mon, 17 May 2004) New Revision: 1410 Added: trunk/debian/patches/006_ati_radeon_fix_eternal_initialization.diff Modified: trunk/debian/CHANGESETS trunk/debian/TODO trunk/debian/changelog trunk/debian/patches/024_ati_r128_and_radeon_en

Re: Bug#249502: sis_drv.so is not included

Enrico Zini wrote: > I don't know if it's intentional or not, but the driver for SIS chipsets > is not included in the package, although it seems to exist upstream. It certainly is, I'm using it on my notebook. It's called sis_drv.o, though: /usr/X11/lib/modules/drivers/sis_drv.o (from xserver-xf

Re: Potential future licensing issues with X.org (code merged from XFree86)

Daniel Stone wrote: >Replying from my PDA is hard, so I'll just briefly say that I have one >hundred per cent confidence in the tree as it stands, Um, in the X.org tree, you mean? (Or in the Debian tree, in which I have confidence as well?) If you refer to the X.org tree, well, I am specifically

it has been arranged

Believe in soul mates? A friend has set you up with someone special. http://nothingbutdate.com/confirm/?oc=50795656 The FREE dating web site CREATED BY WOMEN Don't want these notifications? http://nothingbutdate.com/remove/?oc=50795656 aabsenteeharass bettor cog tri

pocus

Aurelio Hannah,{ The [EMAIL PROTECTED] will all0w you to receive all the [EMAIL PROTECTED] that you 0rder with your remote contr0l,+ payperviews,XXX-movies,sp0rt events,special-events%,RND_SYB http://www.9006hosting.com/cable/ ytterbium ,functor ,puddly ,daybreak .

Processed: tagging 246901

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > # fixed in Debian X Strike Force XFree86 repository; to view, run "svn diff > -r 1409:1410 svn://necrotic.deadbeast.net/xfree86" > tags 246901 + pending Bug#246901: xserver-xfree8

Re: Potential future licensing issues with X.org (code merged from XFree86)

On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 06:25:42PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > Daniel Stone wrote: > >Replying from my PDA is hard, so I'll just briefly say that I have one > >hundred per cent confidence in the tree as it stands, > Um, in the X.org tree, you mean? (Or in the Debian tree, in which I have > c