On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 07:44:49AM -0500, Francois Isabelle wrote:
> Is that what's happening ?
> 1 - XFree86 changed licensing, which introduced some GPL compatibility
> issues and some deviations to debian DFSG(debian free software
> guidelines).
> 2 - Some are arguing that the new licensing is N
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Don Armstrong wrote:
> I will update with results shortly.
Well, the patch works and appears to do the job, and doesn't appear to
cause any other side effects (like anal leakage or cerebral
hemmorage.)
Don Armstrong
--
Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 07:21:10PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> XFree86 4.3 should be in as soon as it builds and is uploaded on s390.
> There's no other new upstream version IMHO worth actually delaying the
> release for.
XFree86 4.3.0 is now only being help up by weird stuff I don't fully
u
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 02:40:00AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 07:21:10PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > XFree86 4.3 should be in as soon as it builds and is uploaded on s390.
> > There's no other new upstream version IMHO worth actually delaying the
> > release fo
Author: branden
Date: 2004-03-27 03:06:41 -0500 (Sat, 27 Mar 2004)
New Revision: 1195
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
Fix typo.
Modified: trunk/debian/changelog
===
--- trunk/debian/changelog 2004-03-27 00:54:22 UTC (r
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.3.0-2
Severity: normal
Followup-For: Bug #234067
I've had this problem now for a some time, probably since 4.3 came about
in Debian.
The machine is not used often (at least, not via X). It stays logged in
for days/weeks at a time. It runs the following GUI prog
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 11:42:30PM -0800, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 02:40:00AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 07:21:10PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > > XFree86 4.3 should be in as soon as it builds and is uploaded on s390.
> > > There's no othe
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 07:48:05AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> *** xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/ati/radeon_driver.c.orig Sun Feb
> 9 20:19:34 2003
> --- xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/ati/radeon_driver.cSun Feb
> 9 21:50:06 2003
> ***
> ***
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 12:30:00AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> >> Upon starting xdm, I notice a delay, and several messages like
> >> Skipping "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libGLcore.a:m_debug_clip.o":
> >> No symbols found
> >> Skipping "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libspeedo.a:spencode.o"
Author: branden
Date: 2004-03-27 05:04:26 -0500 (Sat, 27 Mar 2004)
New Revision: 1196
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/patches/048_radeon_dpms_on_dvi_support.diff
Log:
Add patch annotation and corresponding historical bug-closer.
Modified: trunk/debian/changelog
==
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 07:48:05AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This bug report was fixed in very early versions of 4.3.x -
> 4.3.0-0ds3v2, I believe.
>
> Daniel Stone
I found it. It's patch #048 that did this.
There were no patch annotations, and Martin Loschwitz, who originally
tag 239617 + moreinfo upstream help
thanks
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 10:16:26AM -0800, Nick Rusnov wrote:
> Package: xserver-xfree86
> Version: 4.3.0-7
>
> I have an interesting problem trying to get DRI working on my Radeon
> 9000, with kernel 2.6.4.
[The following is a form letter.]
Dear bug su
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 02:11:48AM -0500, Chung-chieh Shan wrote:
> Package: libx11-6
> Version: 4.3.0-7
> Severity: grave
> Tags: patch l10n
> Justification: causes non-serious data loss
>
> Hello,
>
> If _XimProtoCreateIC() in xc/lib/X11/imDefIc.c fails to create an
> input context, it cleans u
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 01:23:45PM +, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > 2 - Some are arguing that the new licensing is NOT GPL incompatible, but
> > nobody argues that it is not deviating from DFSG
>
> I do not understand that. There is a consensus that the new license is GPL
> incomatible. Whether i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> # fixed in Debian X Strike Force XFree86 repository; to view, run "svn diff
> -r 1196:1197 svn://necrotic.deadbeast.net/xfree86"
> tags 239988 + pending
Bug#239988: libx11-6-dbg:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> tags 239991 + upstream
Bug#239991: ximcp.so.2: segfault after failure to create XIM input context
Tags were: l10n patch
Tags added: upstream
>
End of message, stopping processing h
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 02:11:48AM -0500, Chung-chieh Shan wrote:
> --- xc/lib/X11/imDefIc.c.orig 2001-01-17 14:41:51.0 -0500
> +++ xc/lib/X11/imDefIc.c 2004-03-24 23:47:54.0 -0500
> @@ -1591,6 +1591,7 @@
> return (XIC)ic;
>
> ErrorOnCreatingIC:
> +_XimUnregisterFil
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 12:34:04AM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> > Log:
> > If using Discover 2.x to scan for hardware in the XFree86 X server
> > packages' config scripts, invoke the discover command such that an
> > abnormal exit on its part does not crash the script.
>
> You forgot to close #23
Author: branden
Date: 2004-03-27 05:25:23 -0500 (Sat, 27 Mar 2004)
New Revision: 1197
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/control
Log:
Correct the package description of libx11-6-dbg to accurately identify the
location of Xlib's loadable modules (thanks, Chung-chieh Shan).
(Closes:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> retitle 240169 xserver-xfree86: [s3virge] 'Rotate' option crashes when set to
> 'CCW', misbehaves with 'CW' on ViRGE/DX or /GX rev 1
Bug#240169: xserver-xfree86: [s3virge] Option R
Your message dated Sat, 27 Mar 2004 05:39:32 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#240146: xserver-xfree86: crashes on ATi Radeon IGP340M
during start
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Sat, 27 Mar 2004 05:32:56 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#240013: xext wasn't forced off my system
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 240302 important
Bug#240302: libxft2-dev doesn't install
Severity set to `important'.
> merge 240302 237509
Bug#237509: libxft-dev: upgrading from libxft-dev 2.1.2-[1-5] doesn't work due
to dpkg-divert being run before unpack
Bug#240302: libx
On Sat, 2004-03-27 at 09:13, Cameron Kerr wrote:
>
> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND
> 824 root 5 -10 1547m 671m 84m S 6.0 66.4 74:53.90 XFree86
Have you verified with xrestop that this isn't on behalf of a client?
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer
On Fri, 26 Mar 2004, Daniel Stone wrote:
try to keep the politics on forum.
--
Thomas E. Dickey
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 01:55:28AM -0500, Chung-chieh Shan wrote:
> Package: libx11-6-dbg
> Version: 4.3.0-7
> Severity: minor
>
> The package description says:
>
> Unstripped versions of Xlib's loadable modules for internationalization
> support are provided in /usr/X11R6/lib/debug/X11/locale/
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 11:42:30PM -0800, Daniel Stone wrote:
>...
> Kamion said the only thing holding it up yesterday was an RC bug, which
> I promptly downgraded; if it didn't go in today, I expect that will be
> because of the new sppc upload, making it a transitive problem.
Please don't forge
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 02:18:03PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 11:42:30PM -0800, Daniel Stone wrote:
> >...
> > Kamion said the only thing holding it up yesterday was an RC bug, which
> > I promptly downgraded; if it didn't go in today, I expect that will be
> > because of t
Around 5 o'clock on Mar 27, Branden Robinson wrote:
> OK, but how about the new ~20 second delay from the starting of X when the
> screen goes black, till one finally gets the xdm login screen? With
> no per-line time stamps in /var/log/xdm.log, who knows just what line
> there is responsible, i
X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> +environments where lixbext-dev is not installed, since the Xft1 library
^^
*cough*
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail ad
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 06:39:47AM -0800, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 02:18:03PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 11:42:30PM -0800, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > >...
> > > Kamion said the only thing holding it up yesterday was an RC bug, which
> > > I promptly down
Author: branden
Date: 2004-03-27 13:35:33 -0500 (Sat, 27 Mar 2004)
New Revision: 1198
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
Fix typo (and don't replace it with another one).
Modified: trunk/debian/changelog
===
--- trunk/debian/c
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> reassign 240491 discover
Bug#240491: installation scripts "don't work"
Bug reassigned from package `xserver-xfree86' to `discover'.
> severity 240491 important
Bug#240491: installa
Hello!
You've been successfully added to pianoladynancy, hosted at Topica.
Please take a moment to read the information below and save it for
future reference.
If you believe someone has used your email address without your
consent, please contact Topica's Abuse Team at: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A
On Fri, 2004-03-26 at 23:14, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Package: xserver-xfree86
> Version: 4.3.0-7
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi XSF!
>
> Since some days/weeks (maybe since 4.3.0-6/-7) the Alt-Gr key does not
> work anymore (pc105-de-nodeadkeys keyboard layout). This is pretty
> annoying since it is not p
On Fri, 2004-03-26 at 22:33, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> > reopen 234575
> Bug#234575: ati mobility radeon 9000 igp
> Bug reopened, originator not changed.
>
Hmm, I do
Hi Christian!
On 2004-03-27 22:24 +0100, Christian Guggenberger wrote:
> Do you use login managers like xdm, kdm or gdm?
> if so, let us know, if things like []}\ work there, or not?
Oh, I forgot to mention: I use xdm and I also tried that out there: it
does not work, neither in xdm, nor in xterm
Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 06:51:03PM +0300, Dan Korostelev wrote:
>> Is there any plans to replace XFree86 with XOrg
>> (http://freedesktop.org/Software/xorg), which is actually a fork of
>> XFree 4.4 with free licence.
>>
>> Sorry for my english. Bye.
>
> No, but there are
On Sun, 2004-03-28 at 00:01, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hi again!
>
> After purging and reinstalling several X11-related packages, I finally
> found that reinstalling xbase-clients solves the problem. So this bug
> seems to be a transition problem, therefore I don't close the bug.
glad to hear that it'
Hi again!
After purging and reinstalling several X11-related packages, I finally
found that reinstalling xbase-clients solves the problem. So this bug
seems to be a transition problem, therefore I don't close the bug.
Unfortunately I did not save the files of the old package, so I guess
debugging
Hi!
On 2004-03-28 0:13 +0100, Christian Guggenberger wrote:
> Have you ever had the prerelease packages from experimental installed (
> or DanielS' unofficial 4.3 packages)?
> That could explain transition problems.
About two months ago I had a Radeon 9200 Card to try out and I
installed 4.3.0 f
On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 12:01:40AM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
[...]
> At least I'm happy that I can enter all characters again :-) (Well,
> all but the Euro sign)
About the Euro sign, I can display it in xterm, but only if the
XTerm*locale is not set to true.
Denis
Hi Denis!
On 2004-03-28 0:36 +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> About the Euro sign, I can display it in xterm, but only if the
> XTerm*locale is not set to true.
Don't worry, I already fixed this. This one was a leftover from 4.2.x,
I called xmodmap in /etc/X11/xdm/Xsetup. Now it works everywhere :-
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 12:48:02PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-03-27 at 09:13, Cameron Kerr wrote:
> >
> > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND
> > 824 root 5 -10 1547m 671m 84m S 6.0 66.4 74:53.90 XFree86
>
> Have you verified with xresto
Package: xfree86
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi!
I have found that my Radeon card as well as many others, says that it can
work from 20Mhz to 400Mhz, this would mean that it is not capable of
producing TV frequencies, which it is, I have found that this problem had
been reported on xfree86 bug
Around 17 o'clock on Mar 27, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> for some reason Peter's invited talk proposal "vanished" . What do
> you think? I don't know if there's a spot in freenix for something
> like this if you are interested. He's a good guy (don't know if you
> know him- very active in ou
Around 17 o'clock on Mar 27, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> What are the differences between XOrg's monolithic tree and
> freedesktop.org's modular trees? Are they basically the same code apart
> from the (large) configuration differences, or is one behind/ahead of the
> other regarding drivers, core
52 matches
Mail list logo
