On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 12:36:34PM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
wrote:
> + + udev users will have "/dev/input/mousen" -- configure that as only mouse
> +device? (see #237574)
Interesting. The knoppix script actually sets up a single device in /dev
to run everything through, but
The attached patch has been in the CVS tree for some time (not sure
when it was added, but it definitely has made into XFree86 v4.4.0) and
I was hoping that it could be applied to the Debian/{unstable,testing}
package as well. It shouldn't have any negative effect (in case it
isn't obvious: zx1 is
Author: branden
Date: 2004-03-16 02:30:32 -0500 (Tue, 16 Mar 2004)
New Revision: 1150
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/patches/905_debian_xdm.diff
Log:
Update examples and information in xdm's Xservers file to give sysadmins
more detailed and accurate advice, and to use XFree86
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> retitle 237878 xdm: Xservers file should reflect XFree86 4.0's change from
> -bpp to -depth
Bug#237878: xdm should reflect XFree86 4.0s change from -bpp to -depth
Changed Bug title
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> tags 237878 - sid
Bug#237878: xdm: Xservers file should reflect XFree86 4.0's change from -bpp to
-depth
Tags were: patch sid
Tags removed: sid
>
End of message, stopping processi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> retitle 237877 xdm: stop passing '-dpi 100' option to X server by default
Bug#237877: should xdm still force a dpi 100 by default?
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping pro
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> tags 237877 - sid
Bug#237877: xdm: stop passing '-dpi 100' option to X server by default
Tags were: wontfix patch sid
Tags removed: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> # fixed in Debian X Strike Force XFree86 repository; to view, run "svn diff
> -r 1149:1150 svn://necrotic.deadbeast.net/xfree86"
> tags 237878 + pending
Bug#237878: xdm: Xservers
Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> But frankly, I don't understand why. Does the TMDS specification imply
>> a DVI output instead of analog output ?
>
> It's rather the other way around: analog connector implies treatment as
> a CRT.
As LCD display and LCD/DLP video projectors and getti
I cannot understand what was the problem, but after the weekly
dist-upgrade to today testing, then the problem seems solved.
I will test it with more machines in the next few days and then close
this bug.
Bye,
Giuseppe
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.3.0-5
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch upstream
Notes to self:
Once a bug number is allocated, set submitter to "David Mosberger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>".
Don't forget to check upstream CVS to see if X-Oz/XFree86 1.1 license
has been placed on these files.
Try to g
tag 237509 + wontfix
thanks
(There is no "cantfix" tag.)
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 02:44:35AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> [I am not subscribed to debian-dpkg; please reply to -devel as well.]
>
> Here's a transcript of me testing xft 2.1.2-6, which gets rid of some
> diversions.
>
> As you c
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 03:48:05PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> during the last few months I have created some debian-packages.
>
> 1. xfree86 (4.3.99pre10) - powerpc-only
[...]
> All packages are designed to run on Debian sarge (xfree also runs on sid).
>
> XFree86 was needed fo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 237509 + wontfix
Bug#237509: libxft-dev: upgrading from libxft-dev 2.1.2-[1-5] doesn't work due
to dpkg-divert being run before unpack
Tags were: sid
Bug#237511: libxft-dev: upgrading from libxft-dev 2.1.2-[1-5] doesn't work due
to dpkg-divert bei
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> owner 238276 David Mosberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bug#238276: xserver-xfree86: IA64 zx1 PCI support
Owner recorded as David Mosberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> # don't forget the lice
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 07:29:58PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 06:18, Luke Schierer wrote:
> > yay! you rock! that works. thank you very much :-)
>
> Glad it's working. I defer to yours and Branden's judgement on how to
> proceed with this bug.
I think it can probably be c
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 05:06:21PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Christian Guggenberger wrote:
> > Just for your info - starting with 4.3.0, the i810 driver supports the
> > i865G
> > as well.
> > See, if things work better with the i810 instead of vesa driver.
>
> This probably fixes #1589
Author: branden
Date: 2004-03-16 05:06:36 -0500 (Tue, 16 Mar 2004)
New Revision: 1151
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/control
Log:
Drop xlibs's conflicts/replaces relationship with xlib6 (the old,
no-longer-maintained, security-hole-ridden libc5 version of the X
libraries from
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 11:20:38AM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote:
> I mentioned this in #233818 already but I now suspect that the cases of xlib6
> and xlib6g may differ in important respects so I am filing a separate report.
>
> WordPerfect 8 works with xlib6, xpm4.7 and libc5. Until release 4.3 of
>
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 04:53:00PM +0100, Ivan Dodig wrote:
> Where can i find it on the internet for free??? Please help!!!
[The following is a form letter.]
Hello,
You recently sent an off-charter message to the debian-x mailing list.
First, I will offer an explanation of what this mailing lis
Author: branden
Date: 2004-03-16 05:13:46 -0500 (Tue, 16 Mar 2004)
New Revision: 1152
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
Revert r1147. The VT switching problem observed in the referenced bug
report was the result of bad interaction between KDE and xmodmap, and not a
video driver issue. See
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> # fixed in Debian X Strike Force XFree86 repository; to view, run "svn diff
> -r 1150:1151 svn://necrotic.deadbeast.net/xfree86"
> tags 236780 + pending
Bug#236780: No need to Con
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 03:01:08PM +0100, Eric Valette wrote:
> Package: xbase-clients
> Version: 4.3.0-5
> Severity: important
>
> After using xf86cfg, the numeric keypad behavior (used to move
> the mouse in case it is not correctly configurated), the normal
> usage is not restored...
As a wor
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 12:03:25PM +0100, Christian Guggenberger wrote:
> Anyway, now we do a least know, that the VBERestore Option (set to false)
> really prevents X server crashes, while switching VT's.
> Branden you might want do undo "SVN commit: r1147 - trunk/debian"( the bug
> closer), as
retitle 237371 xserver-xfree86: touchpad tap-to-click feature nonfunctional
reassign 237371 xserver-xfree86
tag 237371 + moreinfo upstream
thanks
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 10:46:10AM +0100, Angel Abad (Indio) wrote:
> Package: xfree86-common
> Version: 4.3.0-5
> Severity: normal
> Tags: sid
>
> The
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 237371 xserver-xfree86: touchpad tap-to-click feature nonfunctional
Bug#237371: xfree86-common: The touchpad click not works
Changed Bug title.
> reassign 237371 xserver-xfree86
Bug#237371: xserver-xfree86: touchpad tap-to-click feature nonfunc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> retitle 237393 xserver-xfree86: [vga] screen blanking (e.g. with 'xset s
> blank') doesn't work on Intel Corp. 865G Chipset Graphics Controller rev 2
Bug#237393: xserver-xfree86: S
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> severity 237939 normal
Bug#237939: xbase-clients: xf86cfg does not restore numeric keypad
Severity set to `normal'.
> retitle 237939 xbase-clients: [xf86cfg] does not switch off Mo
tag 234058 + moreinfo
thanks
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 11:18:11PM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > reassign 234058 xserver-xfree86
> Bug#234058: gdm: Capslock warning on sparc warns for numlock, not capslock
> Bug reassigned from package `g
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 234058 + moreinfo
Bug#234058: gdm: Capslock warning on sparc warns for numlock, not capslock
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admi
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 12:04:07AM -0800, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> Package: xfree86
> Severity: minor
> Version: 4.3.0-5
>
> When I was trying to build a custom version of xfree86 using
> IGNORE_MANIFEST_CHANGES, it didn't work. The problem appears to be
> that the diff command is returning an ex
retitle 238100 xserver-xfree86: [sis] XVideo doesn't work on 86C326 5598/6326
rev 11
tag 238100 + upstream
thanks
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 11:11:28AM +0100, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
> Package: xserver-xfree86
> Version: 4.3.0-5
> Severity: normal
> Tags: sid
>
> I use a few applications using
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 238100 xserver-xfree86: [sis] XVideo doesn't work on 86C326 5598/6326
> rev 11
Bug#238100: xserver-xfree86: Xvideo seems broken since upgrade to 4.3.0
Changed Bug title.
> tag 238100 + upstream
Bug#238100: xserver-xfree86: [sis] XVideo doesn't
On 16.03.2004 11:22 Branden Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 05:06:21PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Christian Guggenberger wrote:
> > Just for your info - starting with 4.3.0, the i810 driver supports the
i865G
> > as well.
> > See, if things work better with the i810 instead of v
Just FYI, I don't see any problems with screen blanking here on my i865G.
xset s 10 10
xset s blank
works as expected.
(and does with other video cards as well: radeon-7000, r128-ultra, i845G)
- Christian
On 16.03.2004 12:18 Christian Guggenberger wrote:
Just FYI, I don't see any problems with screen blanking here on my i865G.
xset s 10 10
xset s blank
works as expected.
(and does with other video cards as well: radeon-7000, r128-ultra, i845G)
I should add, that I'm using the i810 driver on
On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 10:59, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 07:29:58PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 06:18, Luke Schierer wrote:
> > > yay! you rock! that works. thank you very much :-)
> >
> > Glad it's working. I defer to yours and Branden's judgement o
It's not as simple as "dpkg -r libxft-dev" because a heap of GNOME
-dev libraries depend on that package directly or indirectly.
Is it necessary to divert a file to a name used by a previous version of
the package?
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 16.03.2004 14:15 Hamish Moffatt wrote:
It's not as simple as "dpkg -r libxft-dev" because a heap of GNOME
-dev libraries depend on that package directly or indirectly.
you can avoid this by:
$ dpkg - r --force-depends libxft-dev
$ apt-get -f install
and probably a :
$ apt-get install lib
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 11:59:05PM +0100, Christian Guggenberger wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 16:44, Mark Zimmerman wrote:
> > Greetings:
> >
> > I am running a mixed testing/unstable setup on a Dell system with the
> > Intel 865G onboard graphics device. I installed the latest Xfree86
> > packa
On 16.03.2004 17:15 Mark Zimmerman wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 11:59:05PM +0100, Christian Guggenberger wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 16:44, Mark Zimmerman wrote:
> > Greetings:
> >
> > I am running a mixed testing/unstable setup on a Dell system with the
> > Intel 865G onboard graphics dev
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.3.0-5
Severity: normal
The xserver-xfree86.config file tests if the driver is a i810, and if it is,
sets the default VideoRam to 8192. This will prevent dri from working since
it needs more ram. I think the VideoRam option should not be set by default
when th
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 01:45:26AM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> reassign 238189 kcontrol
> thanks
Please do not play pingpong with bugs. Branden, do you have an opionion
about this bug? should we split the setxkbmap stuff and kcontrol
having keyboard options that do nothing?
> > kcontrol uses it
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.3.0-5
Severity: normal
Tags: sid
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Since upgrading to the xserver my "< >" key is not available any more.
I read the bugreports with all the people having wrongly pc104 instead
of pc105. I belonged to them, so I cha
my ati radeon Mobility M6 LY rev 0 card hooked up to a single Gateway
EV500 did not pay attention to the horizontal and vertical sync rates
specified in the XF86Config-4 file resulting in its defaulting to a very
low resolution. This appears to have happened because it defaulted to
thinking th
This bug no longer applies to the Xfree 4.3.
Thanks,
Rafael Ávila de Espíndola
On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 18:08, Jens Nachtigall wrote:
> Package: xserver-xfree86
> Version: 4.3.0-5
> Severity: normal
> Tags: sid
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Since upgrading to the xserver my "< >" key is not available any more.
> I read the bugreports with all the peo
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 02:30:50AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 03:45:45PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > Colin Watson wrote:
> > > The problem appears to be that the sunffb patch added in 4.3.0-3
> > > declares and uses FFBDPMSSet, but doesn't actually provide a new
> >
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 07:02:55PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 02:30:50AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 03:45:45PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > Colin Watson wrote:
> > > > The problem appears to be that the sunffb patch added in 4.3.0-3
> > >
On Friday 12 March 2004 20:49, Christian Guggenberger wrote:
[snip]
>
> in the meantime, do a:
>
> $ apt-get -f install
> $ dpkg -r --force-depends libxft-dev
> $ apt-get -f install
>
> and probably a:
> $ apt-get install libxft-dev
>
> - Christian
"apt-get -f install" will uninstall any packages
Package: xutils
Version: 4.1.0-16woody3
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
(xutils seems to own lndir; why is that?)
I discovered a flaw in lndir.
First, please observe the following, correct, behaviour.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ mkdir sourcedir; cd sourcedir
[EMAIL P
Author: branden
Date: 2004-03-16 15:37:47 -0500 (Tue, 16 Mar 2004)
New Revision: 1153
Added:
trunk/debian/patches/072_Xserver_fb_convert_RGB_to_BGR.diff
Removed:
trunk/debian/patches/072_Xserver_fb_convert_RGB_to_BGR.diff
trunk/debian/patches/073_sunffb_xaa_render_fb_support.diff
Modified
Author: branden
Date: 2004-03-16 15:46:39 -0500 (Tue, 16 Mar 2004)
New Revision: 1154
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/rules
Log:
Fix IGNORE_MANFIEST_CHANGES logic to properly distinguish diff's exit
codes, and work as intended. Thanks to Daniel Schepler for bringing this
probl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> # fixed in Debian X Strike Force XFree86 repository; to view, run "svn diff
> -r 1153:1154 svn://necrotic.deadbeast.net/xfree86"
> tags 238080 + pending
Bug#238080: xfree86: IGNOR
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> # fixed in Debian X Strike Force XFree86 repository; to view, run "svn diff
> -r 1152:1153 svn://necrotic.deadbeast.net/xfree86"
> tags 236705 + pending
Bug#236705: xfree86: FTBFS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
The bug is gone with the -5 version of xfree86.
Regard
Klaus
- --
Klaus Ethgenhttp://www.ethgen.de/
pub 2048R/D1A4EDE5 2000-02-26 Klaus Ethgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fingerprint: D7 67 71 C4 99 A6 D4 FE EA 40 30 57 3C 88 26 2B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Package: xfree86
Severity: critical
Tags: sid
Justification: breaks unrelated software
I had to search for long to adress this problem to the X.
When I start on my system vmware (locales dosn't mater) or audacity
(only with non US locales) the applications do n
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 06:56:50PM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote:
[...]
> > I do not know what kcontrol is supposed to do, but AFAICT CapsLock can
> > not be emulated as on typewriters. The 'Shift cancels Caps' idiom means
> > that Shift+Caps prints lowercase letters (roughly); when Shift is
> > releas
Package: xserver-xfree86
Severity: important
Version: 4.3.0-5
Backtrace at http://rzlab.ucr.edu/debian/xfree86_core_20040316
corefile at http://rzlab.ucr.edu/debian/xfree86_core_20040316 [for ppc]
14:14:54 yeah, I"m running 2.6.3 right now...
14:15:12 H
14:15:15 dondelelcaro:
http
On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 11:10, Branden Robinson wrote:
> You've convinced me, and I've committed a reversion of this decision as
> r1151. The change should appear in XFree86 4.3.0-6.
Thank you kindly.
--
Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 01:02:57AM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote:
[...]
> > If this is still not clear, type
> > $ setxkbmap -option caps:shift
> > [Press CapsLock, followed by '' then Shift+'' and CapsLock again]
> >
> > $ setxkbmap -option caps:shift_nocancel
> > [Press Caps
61 matches
Mail list logo
