On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 17:02, Nathan Poznick wrote:
> Thus spake Michel Dänzer:
> > Does removing ddc from this list make a difference?
>
> Upon closer investigation, even when I remove the line to load the ddc
> module, it still appears to load it right before the crash; this is the
> last thing b
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 08:31:19PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> The debian/scripts/patch.{apply,unapply} scripts explicitly set
> LC_COLLATE=C, which is the fix for this known problem.
>
> In fact, this fix was made in xfree86 4.2.1-10.
>
> I cannot do anything about this bug until I find o
On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 09:54:48AM +, Edward Betts wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 12:42:33AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 06:33:14PM +0100, Fabrice Lorrain (home) wrote:
> > > Out of curiosity, I would appreciate if someone could summup the current
> > > state o
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 09:38:59PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 03:46:05AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
> wrote:
> > Use hardlinks instead of symlinks when copying build tree for debugging
> > server build in build-server target (thanks, David Schmitt).
>
> I
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 03:47:54PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> From the 4.3.0 TODO
Thanks a lot for doing this, Nathanael.
> 001_linux_cf.diff
> ---
> Most of this is present upstream in 4.3.0 branch.
> Essentially all of the rest is in 003_linux.cf_and_xfree86.cf.diff.
>
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 12:18:40PM +0100, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> Le lun 05/01/2004 à 12:10, Michel Dänzer a écrit :
> > On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 22:10, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> > > Le dim 04/01/2004 à 16:20, Jean-Christophe Dubacq a écrit :
> > > > At one point, it was necessary to have also libxcursor
What is the version of svn running on necrotic? Is there any chance of
getting it bumped to a version that supports the blame command?
wt
--
Warren Turkal
President, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
When last we looked at this we were stuck until I could get an unstripped
mga_dri.so and I have a hankering to be playing Quake so I wouldn't mind if I
could get this going again. What would it take for me to build such a thing?
--
greg
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 01:46:51PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> I'm a bit confused by the bug log. Is this a bug in
> linux-kernel-headers, and if so, could you give me a testcase for it?
James Troup is one who asserted that it was a bug in
linux-kernel-headers.
I took his word for it.
>
Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am loading an xmodmap using
*snip*
I don't think debian X packages respect .Xmodmap files by default. Please
see the Debian X Faq. I think there is something in there about this issue.
wt
--
Warren Turkal
President, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
Patch 004 is overkill for making the manpages appears with the right names
in the right places. Here is a replacement for it that does the same thing.
As an added bonus, it also applies to the 4.4 release candidate.
This patch goes in after #900 on my system which is why DebianMaintainer is
allrea
On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 12:48:57PM +0100, Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I was happily using 4.3.0-0pre1v4 on my i830 based laptop and when I
> upgraded to 4.3.0-0pre1v5 VT switching broke.
>
> It is the typical effect descrived by David Dawes in his pages, this is:
> going from X to t
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 02:47:49PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> doctormoo:~> svn co svn://necrotic.deadbeast.net/xfree86/branches/4.3.0/sid
> svn: Berkeley DB error
> svn: Berkeley DB error while opening 'nodes' table for filesystem
> /var/lib/svn/xfree86/db:
> Cannot allocate memory
I've sin
Author: branden
Date: 2004-01-08 07:57:32 -0500 (Thu, 08 Jan 2004)
New Revision: 885
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/TODO
Log:
Update status of xfs patches thanks to Nathanael Nerode.
Modified: branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/TODO
Author: branden
Date: 2004-01-08 07:54:41 -0500 (Thu, 08 Jan 2004)
New Revision: 884
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/TODO
Log:
Update patch status with (much) help from Nathanael Nerode.
Add Vim modeline.
Modified: branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/TODO
==
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 14:01, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 12:18:40PM +0100, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> > Le lun 05/01/2004 à 12:10, Michel Dänzer a écrit :
> > > On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 22:10, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> > > > Le dim 04/01/2004 à 16:20, Jean-Christophe Dubacq a écrit :
>
Author: branden
Date: 2004-01-08 07:45:42 -0500 (Thu, 08 Jan 2004)
New Revision: 883
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/001_kernel_version_in_banner.diff
Log:
Copyedit patch description.
Add authorship and upstream submission status.
Whitespace police.
Modified: branches/4.3.0/sid/
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 13:41, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 03:47:54PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> >
> > * In xfree86.cf, DefaultGcc2i386Opt, DefaultGcc2AxpOpt, and
> > DefaultGcc2PpcOpt
> > are defined to contain GccAliasingArgs. But in linux.cf, they're defined
> > to
Your message dated Thu, 8 Jan 2004 07:22:35 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing this fixed bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 03:53, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 05:00:33PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > You can add the following to your apt preferences file
> > (/etc/apt/preferences):
> >
> > Package: *
> > Pin: release a=xfree86
> > Pin-Priority: 1002
> >
> > Please let me kn
On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 22:54, Alwin Meschede wrote:
> Michel Dänzer wrote:
> >>The Xvideo support for my ATI Mobility Radeon LY seems to be broken in
> >>4.3.0-pre1v5. Instead of the video playback, I only get a blue window.
> >
> > On which head?
>
> Cool. You just pointed me to a workaround for
Warren,
I could not find a reference in the Debian X FAQ to the problem. Please note,
I do load my xmodmap using
$ xmodmap .Xmodmap
and even after that it does not work
It is most likely a very subtile problem since I use that method since 1994
and it worked on all Debian systems since ve
OK, here's what I think is happening.
X is working around a changed type in kd.h by #define rate period.
Then there's something in kbio.h which uses rate.
I don't see this as a kernel headers bug. Fix the rates to be periods
properly. Or do something like
#if defined(LINUX_VERSION_CODE) && def
Your message dated Thu, 8 Jan 2004 07:27:20 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#225685: xfree86-common: Xsession does not perform a proper
login
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
Package: xbase-clients
Version: 4.2.1-15
Severity: important
Tags: sid
Hi!
First, this bug might be similar to the one described in
Bug#189298 and followups.
Maybe this bug is the same or has reappeared.
1.: After upgrading my system to the latest "unstable"-version about a week
ago (it was f
Branden Robinson wrote:
> Hmm. I thought I did this.
>
> Actually, I do. Except I'm asking at medium, not high. It's a "normal
> item that has a reasonable default" (see debconf-devel(7)). A correct
> answer is important for the user to have a good computing experience, so
> it cannot be low p
011_chinese_locale_fixups
-
Present upstream on 4.3 branch.
There are additional Chinese locale bugfixes (for zh_CN.GB2312) on HEAD,
though, which you may want to steal.
011a_recognize_glibc_2.3.2_locale_names
---
Merged (basically un
Hi all, was wondering if anyone could offer some
assistance. I just installed Debian Woody on an IBM
Thinkpad (specs below). I believe I have XF86Config-4
configured properly for my video setup, because I've
found other users with the same machine and used the
same applicable settings (driver, Ho
Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 05:46:46PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Package: xserver-xfree86
> > Version: 4.2.1-14
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > If my debconf priority is high, I do not want to be bothered by
> > questions that have a reasonable default.
>
> In my opinion, mon
000_stolen_from_HEAD_xlib
-
This patch is *ing huge, and took a tediously long time to check,
just due to the need to go through so many files.
Entirely present in upstream 4.3.
A number of the files have additional bug fixes in HEAD, but I'm not
going to even think abou
30 matches
Mail list logo
