reassign 207638 xserver-common,xfree86
severity 207638 important
merge 206790 207638
thanks
[The following is a form letter.]
Hello,
You recently filed a duplicate bug report against Debian's XFree86
packages; that is, the problem had already been reported.
While there is often nothing inherent
Author: branden
Date: 2003-08-28 21:51:23 -0500 (Thu, 28 Aug 2003)
New Revision: 455
Added:
tags/4.2.1-11/
Log:
Tag 4.2.1-11 release.
Copied: tags/4.2.1-11 (from rev 454, trunk)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Oh, balls. Retract my observersation about -n ignoring whitespace. It
> doesn't.
Right; for that, grep -qsv '^[[:space:]]*$' may be your best bet.
> Sigh. Just not my day.
I know the feeling.
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko
Informamos V.Exa. que a SaeR se encontra encerrada para férias durante o período de 15
a 31 de Agosto.
O Vosso e-mail foi, no entanto, bem recepcionado e será respondido oportunamente.
Com os melhores cumprimentos,
SaeR, Lda.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "u
This is an automatic message from the Guinevere
Internet Antivirus Scanner.
A message was received from you with a subject of Re: Thank you!
The message was addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The message probably contains a virus.
You will want to consult with your system administator on how
On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 20:48, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> [...] as I understand it, the new cursor extensions that Keith Packard
> has authored may make more people want to use software cursors, [...]
How does that matter? AFAIK the X server switches to software cursor
automatically if the driver
On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 16:47, Brian Almeida wrote:
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> 0x08649121 in __glXCreateDrawablePrivate (pDraw=0x8bd7f80, drawId=2097154,
> modes=0x0) at glxutil.c:334
Have you verified that Q3A isn't picking up a different libGL? Either
way, you ma
This is an automatic message from the Guinevere
Internet Antivirus Scanner.
A message was received from you with a subject of Re: Details
The message was addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The message probably contains a virus.
You will want to consult with your system administator on how
t
On Friday 29 August 2003 06:21 am, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 16:47, Brian Almeida wrote:
> > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> > 0x08649121 in __glXCreateDrawablePrivate (pDraw=0x8bd7f80,
> > drawId=2097154, modes=0x0) at glxutil.c:334
>
> Have you verified t
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 13:05, Brian Almeida wrote:
> On Friday 29 August 2003 06:21 am, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 16:47, Brian Almeida wrote:
> > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> > > 0x08649121 in __glXCreateDrawablePrivate (pDraw=0x8bd7f80,
> > > drawId=
Package: xserver-common
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-29
Severity: normal
Like xserver-xfree86, the postrm script hangs. It's hard to uninstall.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: sparc
Kernel: Linux mammoth 2.4.21 #1 Thu Aug 7 20:30:12 EDT 2003 sparc
Your message dated Thu, 28 Aug 2003 23:48:48 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#207305: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Thu, 28 Aug 2003 23:48:48 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#206949: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Fri, 29 Aug 2003 11:18:18 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#207760: xserver-common: postrm script hangs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Author: branden
Date: 2003-08-29 15:11:05 -0500 (Fri, 29 Aug 2003)
New Revision: 456
Modified:
trunk/debian/xserver-common.postrm.in
trunk/debian/xserver-xfree86.postrm.in
Log:
debian/xserver-{common,xfree86}.postrm.in: per suggestion from Aaron M.
Ucko, simplify baroque construction "[ -n
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 01:18:10AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 20:48, Branden Robinson wrote:
> >
> > [...] as I understand it, the new cursor extensions that Keith Packard
> > has authored may make more people want to use software cursors, [...]
>
> How does that matter?
What is the ati 128mb ddr radeon 9800 support status in experimental or any other of
the X incarnations?
I think I got my self into a mess by buying this card.
Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello, I solved the problem in my computer by simply updating the kernel to
version 2.4.21.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Thu, 28 Aug 2003 23:48:48 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#207229: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-29
Severity: normal
It's hard to uninstall this package because xserver-xfree86.postrm
hangs.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: sparc
Kernel: Linux mammoth 2.4.21 #1 Thu Aug 7 20:30:12 EDT 2003 sp
Hi,
I've built 4.3.0-0pre1v1 for mips. Should I upload the packages to
experimental?
Regards,
-- Guido
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 10:14:27 -0500
Source: xfree86
Binary: xlibs-static-pic xserver-common libxaw7-dbg xlibmesa-glu-dev xlibmesa-drm-
Package: xserver-common
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-29
Severity: normal
Like xserver-xfree86, the postrm script hangs. It's hard to uninstall.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: sparc
Kernel: Linux mammoth 2.4.21 #1 Thu Aug 7 20:30:12 EDT 2003 sparc
Your message dated Thu, 28 Aug 2003 23:48:48 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#206949: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
[Please CC me as I am not subscribed to debian-x]
Hi,
I was playing around with the 4.3.0-0pre1v1 debs from experimental last
night, and after upgrading and compiling/installing the new dri kernel modules
from xlibmesa-drm-src, quake3 1.32b reliably crashes X with a signal 11.
DRI was enabled (ve
Author: branden
Date: 2003-08-28 13:23:51 -0500 (Thu, 28 Aug 2003)
New Revision: 454
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/xserver-xfree86.preinst.in
trunk/debian/xserver-xfree86.prerm.in
Log:
debian/xserver-xfree86.preinst.in: when installing (not upgrading)
xserver-xfree86*, p
This is an automatic message from the Guinevere
Internet Antivirus Scanner.
A message was received from you with a subject of Re: Details
The message was addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The message probably contains a virus.
You will want to consult with your system administator on how
t
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 02:37:13PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > - if [ -n "$(cat "$XWRAPPER_CONFIG_ROSTER.dpkg-tmp")" ]; then
> > + if [ -n "$(cat "$XWRAPPER_CONFIG_ROSTER.dpkg-tmp" 2> /dev/null)" ];
> > then
>
> Incidentally,
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 13:05, Brian Almeida wrote:
> On Friday 29 August 2003 06:21 am, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 16:47, Brian Almeida wrote:
> > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> > > 0x08649121 in __glXCreateDrawablePrivate (pDraw=0x8bd7f80,
> > > drawId=
Your message dated Thu, 28 Aug 2003 23:48:48 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#207305: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
This is an automatic message from the Guinevere
Internet Antivirus Scanner.
A message was received from you with a subject of Re: Thank you!
The message was addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The message probably contains a virus.
You will want to consult with your system administator on how
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 02:37:13PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > - if [ -n "$(cat "$XWRAPPER_CONFIG_ROSTER.dpkg-tmp")" ]; then
> > + if [ -n "$(cat "$XWRAPPER_CONFIG_ROSTER.dpkg-tmp" 2> /dev/null)" ];
> > then
>
> Incidentally,
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 02:51:07AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > > Option "SWcursor" is only needed in a minority of cases as well (and
> > > then it's a driver bug which should simply be fixed), but you even want
>
> Of course it is a driver but, but not giving it a chance to appear is
> IMO a b
Author: branden
Date: 2003-08-28 21:51:23 -0500 (Thu, 28 Aug 2003)
New Revision: 455
Added:
tags/4.2.1-11/
Log:
Tag 4.2.1-11 release.
Copied: tags/4.2.1-11 (from rev 454, trunk)
Your message dated Fri, 29 Aug 2003 11:18:18 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#207760: xserver-common: postrm script hangs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Oh, balls. Retract my observersation about -n ignoring whitespace. It
doesn't.
Sigh. Just not my day.
--
G. Branden Robinson|I am sorry, but what you have
Debian GNU/Linux |mistaken for malicious intent is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |nothin
i get "Couldn't load XKB keymap, falling back to pre-XKB keymap". the error
does not tell, which
one it tries to load.
i use 4.2.1-9, 4.2.1-10.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 20:48, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> [...] as I understand it, the new cursor extensions that Keith Packard
> has authored may make more people want to use software cursors, [...]
How does that matter? AFAIK the X server switches to software cursor
automatically if the driver
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Oh, balls. Retract my observersation about -n ignoring whitespace. It
> doesn't.
Right; for that, grep -qsv '^[[:space:]]*$' may be your best bet.
> Sigh. Just not my day.
I know the feeling.
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko
Informamos V.Exa. que a SaeR se encontra encerrada para férias durante o
período de 15 a 31 de Agosto.
O Vosso e-mail foi, no entanto, bem recepcionado e será respondido
oportunamente.
Com os melhores cumprimentos,
SaeR, Lda.
On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 16:47, Brian Almeida wrote:
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> 0x08649121 in __glXCreateDrawablePrivate (pDraw=0x8bd7f80, drawId=2097154,
> modes=0x0) at glxutil.c:334
Have you verified that Q3A isn't picking up a different libGL? Either
way, you ma
This is an automatic message from the Guinevere
Internet Antivirus Scanner.
A message was received from you with a subject of Re: That movie
The message was addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The message probably contains a virus.
You will want to consult with your system administator on how
Author: branden
Date: 2003-08-29 15:11:05 -0500 (Fri, 29 Aug 2003)
New Revision: 456
Modified:
trunk/debian/xserver-common.postrm.in
trunk/debian/xserver-xfree86.postrm.in
Log:
debian/xserver-{common,xfree86}.postrm.in: per suggestion from Aaron M.
Ucko, simplify baroque construction "[ -n
On Friday 29 August 2003 06:21 am, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 16:47, Brian Almeida wrote:
> > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> > 0x08649121 in __glXCreateDrawablePrivate (pDraw=0x8bd7f80,
> > drawId=2097154, modes=0x0) at glxutil.c:334
>
> Have you verified t
reassign 207638 xserver-common,xfree86
severity 207638 important
merge 206790 207638
thanks
[The following is a form letter.]
Hello,
You recently filed a duplicate bug report against Debian's XFree86
packages; that is, the problem had already been reported.
While there is often nothing inherent
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 01:18:10AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 20:48, Branden Robinson wrote:
> >
> > [...] as I understand it, the new cursor extensions that Keith Packard
> > has authored may make more people want to use software cursors, [...]
>
> How does that matter?
What is the ati 128mb ddr radeon 9800 support status in experimental or any
other of the X incarnations?
I think I got my self into a mess by buying this card.
Thanks.
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-29
Severity: normal
It's hard to uninstall this package because xserver-xfree86.postrm
hangs.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: sparc
Kernel: Linux mammoth 2.4.21 #1 Thu Aug 7 20:30:12 EDT 2003 sp
Hello, I solved the problem in my computer by simply updating the kernel to
version 2.4.21.
Hi,
I've built 4.3.0-0pre1v1 for mips. Should I upload the packages to
experimental?
Regards,
-- Guido
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 10:14:27 -0500
Source: xfree86
Binary: xlibs-static-pic xserver-common libxaw7-dbg xlibmesa-glu-dev
xlibmesa-drm
Your message dated Thu, 28 Aug 2003 23:48:48 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#206971: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 13:17:07 -0500
Source: xfree86
Binary: xlibmesa3-gl xserver-common libxaw7-dbg xlibmesa-glu-dev xbase-clients
twm xlibmesa3-dbg xfonts-scalable xfonts-75dpi libdps1-dbg xmh libxaw6-dbg xfwp
xlibs xlibosmesa3-dbg xli
Your message dated Thu, 28 Aug 2003 23:48:48 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#207229: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Thu, 28 Aug 2003 23:48:47 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#206929: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Subject: xserver-xfree86: autoconfiguration like knoppix
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-10
Severity: wishlist
Tags: sid
it would be very nice, if ther would be an autoconfiguration like knoppix does
it. i think many of
the problem reports would disappear by itself then.
mostly it is not
Your message dated Thu, 28 Aug 2003 23:48:47 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#204148: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Fri, 29 Aug 2003 18:58:54 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#207809: xserver-xfree86: postrm script hangs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Fri, 29 Aug 2003 18:59:35 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#200170: 200170 xserver-xfree86: keyboard occasionally
ignored
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
Your message dated Thu, 28 Aug 2003 23:48:48 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#207268: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Thu, 28 Aug 2003 23:48:47 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#206790: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Thu, 28 Aug 2003 23:48:47 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#206790: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Thu, 28 Aug 2003 23:48:48 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#207239: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-10
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Please find attached the dutch po-debconf translation. Please add it to your
next package revision, it should be inserted in your package build-tree as
debian/po/nl.po, TIA.
Feel free
Your message dated Thu, 28 Aug 2003 23:48:47 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#172579: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Thu, 28 Aug 2003 23:48:47 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#206524: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Thu, 28 Aug 2003 23:48:47 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#206790: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
65 matches
Mail list logo
