Author: daniel
Date: 2003-06-13 01:54:16 -0500 (Fri, 13 Jun 2003)
New Revision: 191
Added:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/302_arm_compiler.h.diff
Log:
New patch #302: ARM compiler.h diff from Phil Blundell. Maybe there's a
snowball's chance in hell of ARM completing a build now. We'll see.
Author: daniel
Date: 2003-06-13 01:59:42 -0500 (Fri, 13 Jun 2003)
New Revision: 193
Modified:
people/daniel/STATUS
Log:
update p/d/STATUS with new arm info. i'm going to ping
arm/hppa/ia64/m68k/mipsel/s390, as i think i've resolved their ftbfses.
Modified: people/daniel/STATUS
===
Author: daniel
Date: 2003-06-13 01:56:40 -0500 (Fri, 13 Jun 2003)
New Revision: 192
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog
Log:
changelog: minor, cosmetic, typographical, crap.
Modified: branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog
===
Since the mailing list software has the nice feature of flushing big
messages please check svn logs for changes.
Fabio
--
Our mission: make IPv6 the default IP protocol
"We are on a mission from God" - Elwood Blues
http://www.itojun.org/paper/itojun-nanog-200210-ipv6isp/mgp4.html
--
To
Looking at the build logs you'll see many warnings:
dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules
Is it safe to ignore these warnings? Please could you try to compile
using -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing to see if this is related to the recent
miscompilation using gcc-3.3?
Tha
Author: ishikawa
Date: 2003-06-13 02:34:38 -0500 (Fri, 13 Jun 2003)
New Revision: 194
Modified:
people/ishikawa/debian/MANIFEST.alpha
people/ishikawa/debian/MANIFEST.sparc
Log:
update MANIFEST.alpha and MANIFEST.sparc
Modified: people/ishikawa/debian/MANIFEST.alpha
===
The problem is partly fixed, but there are some programs that still
trigger this (or a similar) bug. I am filing this problems as bug
#196718 since it started as this bug in Enlightenment, but have moved
over to KDE and Gnome after the bugfix.
I file this report with doubt, because of the flame
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Looking at the build logs you'll see many warnings:
>
> dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules
>
> Is it safe to ignore these warnings? Please could you try to compile
> using -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing to see if this is re
On 12.VI.2003 at 15:04 Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 06:33:47PM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> > xbase-clients.postinst should invoke xftcache in font directories.
>
> Why? xbase-clients doesn't ship any fonts.
>
> > The Type1 packages doesn't depend on xbase-clients and xf
On 12.VI.2003 at 14:53 Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 06:31:32PM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> > Thats why packages providing Type1 fonts (as gsfonts and
> > scalable-cyrfonts) have to be doubled -- one version for defoma and
> > another for X.
>
> I do not understand why thi
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 11:33:02AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>
> I don't think so.
> site.def uses site local specific setting.
> Distribution common settings should not into this file.
ok.
> >> - you're moving stuff into debian.cf that isn't actualy debian-specific.
> >> when i said "
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 10:17:14PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
>
> And the NetBSD one is *not* GNU-based,
Actualy I agree with that.
> which is even more reason to split
> the Debian-specific bits into a different file from the GNU-specific bits.
That's fine; then there are only Glibc-specific bit
Author: ishikawa
Date: 2003-06-13 07:29:19 -0500 (Fri, 13 Jun 2003)
New Revision: 195
Added:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/909_debian_piclib_support.diff
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.alpha
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.i386
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.sp
Robert Millan wrote:
ISHIKAWA, what about splitting all common stuff into Debian.cf, and
Glibc-specific stuff into Glibc.cf?
Isn't it right that any glibc-based system is GNU system? Glibc
requires GCC[1], which in turn requires (in most cases[2]) GNU binutils.
[1] http://www.gnu.org/software/l
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 07:30:37AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote:
> - xlibs-pic package rename to xlibs-pic-dev
> - add xlibs-pic-dev entry into debian/control
> - piclib_support.diff reintegrate as
>909_debian_piclib_support.diff
> - update patch #003
>disable StaticNeedsPicFor
Author: daniel
Date: 2003-06-13 08:30:26 -0500 (Fri, 13 Jun 2003)
New Revision: 196
Modified:
people/daniel/STATUS
Log:
another status update; gcc-3.3, ugh. worst. piece. of. software. ever.
does anyone actually test these things?
Modified: people/daniel/STATUS
==
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 04:33:35PM +0300, Ognyan Kulev wrote:
> Robert Millan wrote:
>
> >ISHIKAWA, what about splitting all common stuff into Debian.cf, and
> >Glibc-specific stuff into Glibc.cf?
>
> Isn't it right that any glibc-based system is GNU system?
no. the GNU system is not a set of C
Can someone on debian-x please translate this report into language I can
understand? This person throws around terms like "locked" and all I can
see is red.
I don't know what's wrong with his system but I'm pretty sure that
XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 is fixed. If it weren't I'd still be getting 10--20
retitle 119297 xlibmesa3-gl: would like package to Suggest libglide3
thanks
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 12:33:09AM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > reassign 119297 xlibmesa3-gl
> Bug#119297: libglide3 is reported useless by deborphan
> Bug re
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 119297 xlibmesa3-gl: would like package to Suggest libglide3
Bug#119297: libglide3 is reported useless by deborphan
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adm
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > - you're moving stuff into debian.cf that isn't actualy debian-specific.
>> > when i said "gnu-common.cf" i meant stuff common to GNUish systems
>> > (mostly related to Glibc and userland), but not debian-sp
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 12:57:09PM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On 12.VI.2003 at 15:04 Branden Robinson wrote:
> > xbase-clients neither knows what place in the installation sequence it
> > has relative to font packages, nor can it affect that place.
>
> Exactly. When it happens xbase-clients t
On Fri, 2003-06-13 at 18:32, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Can someone on debian-x please translate this report into language I can
> understand? This person throws around terms like "locked" and all I can
> see is red.
Sounds to me like it could be a driver problem, but it's very hard to
tell withou
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 07:30:37AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote:
>> > - xlibs-pic package rename to xlibs-pic-dev
>> > - add xlibs-pic-dev entry into debian/control
>> > - piclib_support.diff reintegrate a
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 02:02:37PM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> Type1 fonts can be usable without X. One example is a print server
> which uses ghostscript. Defoma provides ghostscript with fonts.
> Another example can be TeX. The font packages only provide fonts and
> they should not depend o
Author: ishikawa
Date: 2003-06-13 13:04:01 -0500 (Fri, 13 Jun 2003)
New Revision: 197
Added:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/xlibs-pic-dev.install
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/xlibs-pic-dev.install.netbsd-i386
Log:
I forget to add xlibs-pic-dev.install and xlibs-pic-dev.install.netbsd-i386
Added:
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Fri, 2003-06-13 at 18:32, Branden Robinson wrote:
Can someone on debian-x please translate this report into language I can
understand? This person throws around terms like "locked" and all I can
see is red.
Sounds to me like it could be a driver problem, but it's v
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 07:30:37AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote:
> Log:
> xlibs-pic-dev reintegrate
>
> - xlibs-pic package rename to xlibs-pic-dev
Uh, why is this package being renamed?
--
G. Branden Robinson| Measure with micrometer,
Debian GNU/Linux
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 01:48:42PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 10:17:14PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
> >
> > And the NetBSD one is *not* GNU-based,
>
> Actualy I agree with that.
>
> > which is even more reason to split
> > the Debian-specific bits into a different file f
Author: ishikawa
Date: 2003-06-13 13:31:39 -0500 (Fri, 13 Jun 2003)
New Revision: 198
Added:
people/ishikawa/debian/xlibs-pic-dev.install
people/ishikawa/debian/xlibs-pic-dev.install.netbsd-i386
Removed:
people/ishikawa/debian/xlibs-pic.install
people/ishikawa/debian/xlibs-pic.install.
On 13.VI.2003 at 11:43 Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> Let me mull over this. I don't want xbase-clients to go poking around
> the file system looking for fonts to configure. There should be one and
> only one directory it has to traverse. (My preference is
> /etc/X11/fonts.)
As minimum this will
On 13.VI2003 at 11:48 Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> I am unhappy with defoma.
Me too. I discovered that I am not able to remove some fonts from my
packages. This is a design flaw, though it can be fixed.
But I am not very embarassed about Defoma because I feel that I if
some problem of Defoma s
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 08:09:51PM +0200, ketil V wrote:
> I used the term "locked" to describe a unresponding, "freezed" state
> where not even the clock - applet and mouse pointer is responding.
That's fine, but that means this bug has absolutely nothing to do with
the XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 proble
On Fri, 2003-06-13 at 22:36, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 08:09:51PM +0200, ketil V wrote:
> > I used the term "locked" to describe a unresponding, "freezed" state
> > where not even the clock - applet and mouse pointer is responding.
>
> That's fine, but that means this bug h
Package: xlibmesa3
Version: 4.2.1-6
Followup-For: Bug #158198
No textures can be uploaded, but the 3D acceleration works fine
otherwise. (such as glxgears). Any game using 3D Textures such as
quake, tuxracer, etc, produces garbled output and spews texture upload
failure messages in the stderr.
Package: xlibmesa3
Version: 4.2.1-6
Followup-For: Bug #158198
Here is xfree86 log:
This is a pre-release version of XFree86, and is not supported in any
way. Bugs may be reported to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and patches submitted
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Before reporting bugs in pre-release versions,
p
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 07:30:37AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote:
>> > Log:
>> > xlibs-pic-dev reintegrate
>> >
>> > - xlibs-pic package rename to xlibs-pic-dev
>>
>> Uh, why is this package being rename
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 119297 xlibmesa3-gl
Bug#119297: libglide3 is reported useless by deborphan
Bug reassigned from package `libglide3' to `xlibmesa3-gl'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adm
Author: daniel
Date: 2003-06-13 01:54:16 -0500 (Fri, 13 Jun 2003)
New Revision: 191
Added:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/302_arm_compiler.h.diff
Log:
New patch #302: ARM compiler.h diff from Phil Blundell. Maybe there's a
snowball's chance in hell of ARM completing a build now. We'll see.
Author: daniel
Date: 2003-06-13 01:59:42 -0500 (Fri, 13 Jun 2003)
New Revision: 193
Modified:
people/daniel/STATUS
Log:
update p/d/STATUS with new arm info. i'm going to ping
arm/hppa/ia64/m68k/mipsel/s390, as i think i've resolved their ftbfses.
Modified: people/daniel/STATUS
===
Author: daniel
Date: 2003-06-13 01:56:40 -0500 (Fri, 13 Jun 2003)
New Revision: 192
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog
Log:
changelog: minor, cosmetic, typographical, crap.
Modified: branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog
===
Since the mailing list software has the nice feature of flushing big
messages please check svn logs for changes.
Fabio
--
Our mission: make IPv6 the default IP protocol
"We are on a mission from God" - Elwood Blues
http://www.itojun.org/paper/itojun-nanog-200210-ipv6isp/mgp4.html
Looking at the build logs you'll see many warnings:
dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules
Is it safe to ignore these warnings? Please could you try to compile
using -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing to see if this is related to the recent
miscompilation using gcc-3.3?
Tha
Author: ishikawa
Date: 2003-06-13 02:34:38 -0500 (Fri, 13 Jun 2003)
New Revision: 194
Modified:
people/ishikawa/debian/MANIFEST.alpha
people/ishikawa/debian/MANIFEST.sparc
Log:
update MANIFEST.alpha and MANIFEST.sparc
Modified: people/ishikawa/debian/MANIFEST.alpha
===
The problem is partly fixed, but there are some programs that still
trigger this (or a similar) bug. I am filing this problems as bug
#196718 since it started as this bug in Enlightenment, but have moved
over to KDE and Gnome after the bugfix.
I file this report with doubt, because of the flam
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Looking at the build logs you'll see many warnings:
>
> dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules
>
> Is it safe to ignore these warnings? Please could you try to compile
> using -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing to see if this is re
On 12.VI.2003 at 15:04 Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 06:33:47PM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> > xbase-clients.postinst should invoke xftcache in font directories.
>
> Why? xbase-clients doesn't ship any fonts.
>
> > The Type1 packages doesn't depend on xbase-clients and xf
On 12.VI.2003 at 14:53 Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 06:31:32PM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> > Thats why packages providing Type1 fonts (as gsfonts and
> > scalable-cyrfonts) have to be doubled -- one version for defoma and
> > another for X.
>
> I do not understand why thi
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 11:33:02AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>
> I don't think so.
> site.def uses site local specific setting.
> Distribution common settings should not into this file.
ok.
> >> - you're moving stuff into debian.cf that isn't actualy debian-specific.
> >> when i said "
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 10:17:14PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
>
> And the NetBSD one is *not* GNU-based,
Actualy I agree with that.
> which is even more reason to split
> the Debian-specific bits into a different file from the GNU-specific bits.
That's fine; then there are only Glibc-specific bit
Author: ishikawa
Date: 2003-06-13 07:29:19 -0500 (Fri, 13 Jun 2003)
New Revision: 195
Added:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/909_debian_piclib_support.diff
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.alpha
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.i386
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.sp
Robert Millan wrote:
ISHIKAWA, what about splitting all common stuff into Debian.cf, and
Glibc-specific stuff into Glibc.cf?
Isn't it right that any glibc-based system is GNU system? Glibc
requires GCC[1], which in turn requires (in most cases[2]) GNU binutils.
[1] http://www.gnu.org/softw
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 07:30:37AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote:
> - xlibs-pic package rename to xlibs-pic-dev
> - add xlibs-pic-dev entry into debian/control
> - piclib_support.diff reintegrate as
>909_debian_piclib_support.diff
> - update patch #003
>disable StaticNeedsPicFor
Author: daniel
Date: 2003-06-13 08:30:26 -0500 (Fri, 13 Jun 2003)
New Revision: 196
Modified:
people/daniel/STATUS
Log:
another status update; gcc-3.3, ugh. worst. piece. of. software. ever.
does anyone actually test these things?
Modified: people/daniel/STATUS
==
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 04:33:35PM +0300, Ognyan Kulev wrote:
> Robert Millan wrote:
>
> >ISHIKAWA, what about splitting all common stuff into Debian.cf, and
> >Glibc-specific stuff into Glibc.cf?
>
> Isn't it right that any glibc-based system is GNU system?
no. the GNU system is not a set of C
Can someone on debian-x please translate this report into language I can
understand? This person throws around terms like "locked" and all I can
see is red.
I don't know what's wrong with his system but I'm pretty sure that
XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 is fixed. If it weren't I'd still be getting 10--20
retitle 119297 xlibmesa3-gl: would like package to Suggest libglide3
thanks
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 12:33:09AM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > reassign 119297 xlibmesa3-gl
> Bug#119297: libglide3 is reported useless by deborphan
> Bug re
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 119297 xlibmesa3-gl: would like package to Suggest libglide3
Bug#119297: libglide3 is reported useless by deborphan
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adm
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > - you're moving stuff into debian.cf that isn't actualy debian-specific.
>> > when i said "gnu-common.cf" i meant stuff common to GNUish systems
>> > (mostly related to Glibc and userland), but not debian-sp
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 12:57:09PM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On 12.VI.2003 at 15:04 Branden Robinson wrote:
> > xbase-clients neither knows what place in the installation sequence it
> > has relative to font packages, nor can it affect that place.
>
> Exactly. When it happens xbase-clients t
On Fri, 2003-06-13 at 18:32, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Can someone on debian-x please translate this report into language I can
> understand? This person throws around terms like "locked" and all I can
> see is red.
Sounds to me like it could be a driver problem, but it's very hard to
tell withou
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 07:30:37AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote:
>> > - xlibs-pic package rename to xlibs-pic-dev
>> > - add xlibs-pic-dev entry into debian/control
>> > - piclib_support.diff reintegrate a
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 02:02:37PM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> Type1 fonts can be usable without X. One example is a print server
> which uses ghostscript. Defoma provides ghostscript with fonts.
> Another example can be TeX. The font packages only provide fonts and
> they should not depend o
Author: ishikawa
Date: 2003-06-13 13:04:01 -0500 (Fri, 13 Jun 2003)
New Revision: 197
Added:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/xlibs-pic-dev.install
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/xlibs-pic-dev.install.netbsd-i386
Log:
I forget to add xlibs-pic-dev.install and xlibs-pic-dev.install.netbsd-i386
Added:
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Fri, 2003-06-13 at 18:32, Branden Robinson wrote:
Can someone on debian-x please translate this report into language I can
understand? This person throws around terms like "locked" and all I can
see is red.
Sounds to me like it could be a driver problem, but i
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 07:30:37AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote:
> Log:
> xlibs-pic-dev reintegrate
>
> - xlibs-pic package rename to xlibs-pic-dev
Uh, why is this package being renamed?
--
G. Branden Robinson| Measure with micrometer,
Debian GNU/Linux
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 01:48:42PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 10:17:14PM -0600, Joel Baker wrote:
> >
> > And the NetBSD one is *not* GNU-based,
>
> Actualy I agree with that.
>
> > which is even more reason to split
> > the Debian-specific bits into a different file f
Author: ishikawa
Date: 2003-06-13 13:31:39 -0500 (Fri, 13 Jun 2003)
New Revision: 198
Added:
people/ishikawa/debian/xlibs-pic-dev.install
people/ishikawa/debian/xlibs-pic-dev.install.netbsd-i386
Removed:
people/ishikawa/debian/xlibs-pic.install
people/ishikawa/debian/xlibs-pic.install.
On 13.VI.2003 at 11:43 Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> Let me mull over this. I don't want xbase-clients to go poking around
> the file system looking for fonts to configure. There should be one and
> only one directory it has to traverse. (My preference is
> /etc/X11/fonts.)
As minimum this will
On 13.VI2003 at 11:48 Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> I am unhappy with defoma.
Me too. I discovered that I am not able to remove some fonts from my
packages. This is a design flaw, though it can be fixed.
But I am not very embarassed about Defoma because I feel that I if
some problem of Defoma s
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 08:09:51PM +0200, ketil V wrote:
> I used the term "locked" to describe a unresponding, "freezed" state
> where not even the clock - applet and mouse pointer is responding.
That's fine, but that means this bug has absolutely nothing to do with
the XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 proble
On Fri, 2003-06-13 at 22:36, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 08:09:51PM +0200, ketil V wrote:
> > I used the term "locked" to describe a unresponding, "freezed" state
> > where not even the clock - applet and mouse pointer is responding.
>
> That's fine, but that means this bug h
Package: xlibmesa3
Version: 4.2.1-6
Followup-For: Bug #158198
No textures can be uploaded, but the 3D acceleration works fine
otherwise. (such as glxgears). Any game using 3D Textures such as
quake, tuxracer, etc, produces garbled output and spews texture upload
failure messages in the stderr.
Package: xlibmesa3
Version: 4.2.1-6
Followup-For: Bug #158198
Here is xfree86 log:
This is a pre-release version of XFree86, and is not supported in any
way. Bugs may be reported to XFree86@XFree86.Org and patches submitted
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Before reporting bugs in pre-release versions,
74 matches
Mail list logo
