Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-4
Severity: important
Since upgrading to 4.2 the i810 3d acceleration produces quite unusable
results, for instance glxgears is repeatedly copied across to whole
screen width and looks sort of "interlaced" and squashed, i.e. every second
row is not displaye
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 09:45:59PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Any idea?
No. Might want to ask upstream.
--
G. Branden Robinson|Humor is a rubber sword - it allows
Debian GNU/Linux |you to make a point without drawing
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 02:54:49AM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> For what it's worth, "in the future" sounds right to me,
> ^^^
> sounds better to my ear than "...future release..." :)
But does it sound better than "in future", e.g., "In future, the
Americans should try ha
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 175911 xserver-xfree86: [mga] wrong modeline being sent to monitor at
> 1280x1024 on MGA G550 AGP rev 1
Bug#175911: xserver-xfree86: [mga] wrong modeline being sent to monitor on MGA
G550 AGP rev 1 at 1280x1024 resolution
Changed Bug title.
>
[CCing Ryan so he can correct me if necessary]
On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 10:03:16PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> I built your 4.2.1-4pre5v1 packages on my computer that has a mixed
> testing/unstable system. I didn't make the gcc transition (the old gcc
> and g++ packages are still installed). Afte
On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 07:51:54PM +, Gavin Hamill wrote:
> On Sunday 19 January 2003 6:31 pm, Gavin Hamill wrote:
>
> Cancel that. I added a window manager and xterm, and all is well.
>
>
>
> I hate X.
Start using the x-window-system or x-window-system-core packages.
--
G. Branden Robin
On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 12:37:02AM -0500, Hesham Hassan wrote:
> I'm not sure if this is X related or not, however this seems to affect only
[...]
1) startup time likely has to do with the large number of shared objects
that need to be linked by KDE applications, and is the motivation for
the "
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 06:50:04PM -0500, Ximmbo da Jazz wrote:
> I have noticed that other people are having this same problem now with
> Xauthority suddenly not allowing certain appz -- even GNOME, FI, to
> start. X starts fine with non-MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE-1.
>
> The ~/.Xauthority file seems to be
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 06:35:31PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> I tried this with Sid version, Brandens preview packages and Daniels
> development tree. In all cases, I noticed a significantly high
> (gigantic) CPU usage when applications tried to load the Unicode
> equivalents of their fonts. For
Your message dated Tue, 21 Jan 2003 13:08:04 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#177195: xserver-xfree86: Old version of trident driver
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 07:09:57AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> wasteful blanks found:
>
> for i in ' ' ' ' ' ';do echo '|';grep "$i"\$
> /var/log/syslog.0;done|\
> grep xfs|sort -u;false
> Jan 18 16:27:08 debian xfs[456]: terminating
> Jan 19 05:43:52 debian xfs: ignoring font path e
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 177731 normal
Bug#177731: xserver-xfree86: DRI output garbled for i810 driver
Severity set to `normal'.
> tag 177731 + upstream
Bug#177731: xserver-xfree86: DRI output garbled for i810 driver
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
> tha
severity 177731 normal
tag 177731 + upstream
thanks
Only lockups and crashes are "important".
--
G. Branden Robinson| The key to being a Southern
Debian GNU/Linux | Baptist: It ain't a sin if you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | don't get ca
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 01:20:17PM -0500, Branden Robinson scrawled:
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 07:09:57AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> > wasteful blanks found:
> >
> > for i in ' ' ' ' ' ';do echo '|';grep "$i"\$
> > /var/log/syslog.0;done|\
> > grep xfs|sort -u;false
> > Jan 18 16:27:
lbxproxy_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/x/xfree86/lbxproxy_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libdps-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libdps1-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libdps1_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
to pool/ma
Here you go, folks.
--
G. Branden Robinson|
Debian GNU/Linux | kernel panic -- causal failure
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | universe will now reboot
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
--- Begin Message ---
lbxproxy_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
to poo
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-4
Severity: important
Since upgrading to 4.2 the i810 3d acceleration produces quite unusable
results, for instance glxgears is repeatedly copied across to whole
screen width and looks sort of "interlaced" and squashed, i.e. every second
row is not displaye
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 09:45:59PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Any idea?
No. Might want to ask upstream.
--
G. Branden Robinson|Humor is a rubber sword - it allows
Debian GNU/Linux |you to make a point without drawing
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 02:54:49AM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> For what it's worth, "in the future" sounds right to me,
> ^^^
> sounds better to my ear than "...future release..." :)
But does it sound better than "in future", e.g., "In future, the
Americans should try ha
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 175911 xserver-xfree86: [mga] wrong modeline being sent to monitor at
>1280x1024 on MGA G550 AGP rev 1
Bug#175911: xserver-xfree86: [mga] wrong modeline being sent to monitor on MGA G550
AGP rev 1 at 1280x1024 resolution
Changed Bug title.
>
[CCing Ryan so he can correct me if necessary]
On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 10:03:16PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> I built your 4.2.1-4pre5v1 packages on my computer that has a mixed
> testing/unstable system. I didn't make the gcc transition (the old gcc
> and g++ packages are still installed). Afte
On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 12:37:02AM -0500, Hesham Hassan wrote:
> I'm not sure if this is X related or not, however this seems to affect only
[...]
1) startup time likely has to do with the large number of shared objects
that need to be linked by KDE applications, and is the motivation for
the "
On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 07:51:54PM +, Gavin Hamill wrote:
> On Sunday 19 January 2003 6:31 pm, Gavin Hamill wrote:
>
> Cancel that. I added a window manager and xterm, and all is well.
>
>
>
> I hate X.
Start using the x-window-system or x-window-system-core packages.
--
G. Branden Robin
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 06:50:04PM -0500, Ximmbo da Jazz wrote:
> I have noticed that other people are having this same problem now with
> Xauthority suddenly not allowing certain appz -- even GNOME, FI, to
> start. X starts fine with non-MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE-1.
>
> The ~/.Xauthority file seems to be
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 06:35:31PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> I tried this with Sid version, Brandens preview packages and Daniels
> development tree. In all cases, I noticed a significantly high
> (gigantic) CPU usage when applications tried to load the Unicode
> equivalents of their fonts. For
Your message dated Tue, 21 Jan 2003 13:08:04 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#177195: xserver-xfree86: Old version of trident driver
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 07:09:57AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> wasteful blanks found:
>
> for i in ' ' ' ' ' ';do echo '|';grep "$i"\$ /var/log/syslog.0;done|\
> grep xfs|sort -u;false
> Jan 18 16:27:08 debian xfs[456]: terminating
> Jan 19 05:43:52 debian xfs: ignoring font path elem
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 177731 normal
Bug#177731: xserver-xfree86: DRI output garbled for i810 driver
Severity set to `normal'.
> tag 177731 + upstream
Bug#177731: xserver-xfree86: DRI output garbled for i810 driver
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
> tha
severity 177731 normal
tag 177731 + upstream
thanks
Only lockups and crashes are "important".
--
G. Branden Robinson| The key to being a Southern
Debian GNU/Linux | Baptist: It ain't a sin if you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | don't get ca
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 01:20:17PM -0500, Branden Robinson scrawled:
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 07:09:57AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> > wasteful blanks found:
> >
> > for i in ' ' ' ' ' ';do echo '|';grep "$i"\$ /var/log/syslog.0;done|\
> > grep xfs|sort -u;false
> > Jan 18 16:27:08 de
lbxproxy_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/x/xfree86/lbxproxy_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libdps-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps-dev_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libdps1-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1-dbg_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
libdps1_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
to pool/ma
Here you go, folks.
--
G. Branden Robinson|
Debian GNU/Linux | kernel panic -- causal failure
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | universe will now reboot
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
--- Begin Message ---
lbxproxy_4.2.1-5_powerpc.deb
to po
Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:39 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#174589: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:39 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#174589: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:39 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#174589: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:39 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#95951: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:38 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#170638: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:38 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#170513: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:37 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#167212: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:37 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#167212: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:39 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#174282: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:38 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#170508: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:38 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#170510: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:38 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#170509: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:38 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#168791: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:38 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#170678: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:39 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#175157: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:39 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#174589: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:38 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#167448: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
I just want to chime in: since Xinerama support has been disabled in
gtk2, my desktop is near unusable. I have one screen smaller then the
other, so there's a "dead area" in which panel menus and windows may be
lost, and there's no way (I know of) to access them.
So yes, I *desesperately* need Xin
Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:39 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#171294: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:40:37 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#166234: fixed in xfree86 4.2.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 12:02:40 -0500
Source: xfree86
Binary: xlibmesa3-gl xserver-common libxaw7-dbg xlibmesa-glu-dev xbase-clients twm
xlibmesa3-dbg xfonts-scalable xfonts-75dpi libdps1-dbg xlib6g-dev xmh libxaw6-dbg xfwp
xlibs xlibosme
53 matches
Mail list logo
