charset="ISO-8859-1";
charset="ISO-8859-1";
charset="ISO-8859-1";
charset="ISO-8859-1";
charset="ISO-8859-1";
charset="ISO-8859-1";
charset="ISO-8859-1";
charset="ISO-8859-1";
charset="ISO-8859-1";
charset="ISO-8859-1";
charset="ISO-885
I've just updated to the last version of x backported for woody, 4.2.1-3
When I try to launch openoffice I've got the following error:
bott@dirac:~ > openoffice
I18N: X Window System doesn't support locale "it_IT.ISO-8859-15@euro"
Aborted
bott@dirac:~ >
If I do `export LC_ALL="C"' everything go
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 11:25:12AM +0200, Ottavio Campana wrote:
> When I try to launch openoffice I've got the following error:
>
> bott@dirac:~ > openoffice
> I18N: X Window System doesn't support locale "it_IT.ISO-8859-15@euro"
> Aborted
> bott@dirac:~ >
>
> If I do `export LC_ALL="C"' everyt
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 02:28:39PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 06:46:03PM +0200, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
> > I have tested the various releases on m68k, so far it seems
> > the module loading in the X server is still broken on the 68060.
> > The statically linked server
Dear Falk and Lists
You'r right, new unstable libc sounds a bit to unstable for me...
Is there any way to replase the xfree86 4.1 in Woody with the 4.2 version,
without having to be a Debian expert?
I'm copying this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for further comments from you and oth
Package: xlibs-dbg
Version: 4.2.1-3
Severity: wishlist
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux lissie 2.4.19 #1 Thu Aug 22 21:43:27 JST 2002 i686 AMD
Athlon(tm) Processor AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
Versions of the packages xlibs-dbg depends on:
hi libfreetype6
There is no need to send me copies of bug reports you file against my
packages. I'll see them because the BTS sends them to me. So, please
don't.
--
G. Branden Robinson| Q: How does a Unix guru have sex?
Debian GNU/Linux | A: unzip;strip;touch;finger;mo
Your message dated Tue, 22 Oct 2002 10:53:20 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#163622: xfree86-common: Error starting X, using Matrox G200
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Your message dated Tue, 22 Oct 2002 10:53:20 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#163622: xfree86-common: Error starting X, using Matrox G200
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 165899 xlibs-dbg: please ship unstripped versions of the Xlib i18n support
>modules
Bug#165899: xlibs-dbg: no unstripped libs for /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/common/*
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contac
[There is no need to CC me on mail to debian-x, which I read.]
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 11:25:14AM +0200, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 02:28:39PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 06:46:03PM +0200, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
> > > I have tested the various
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 11:08:38PM +0900, MINAMI Hirokazu wrote:
> Some i18n related libraries included are located under
> /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/common/. However, corresponding unstripped
> libraries do not present in the "xlibs-dbg" package.
You're correct. I apologize for the oversight.
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 08:22:13PM -0400, Scott Henson wrote:
> You are correct, but apt-get build-dep doesn't know this. I have since
> been educated as to the source of this problem. It is in fact a bug in
> apt-get build-dep that doesn't handle OR's very well. Bugs 98640
> 126938 131265 and
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 09:32:43PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> If DEBIAN_PRIORITY is "low", then this is exactly what the user is asking
> for. They want to see everything, even questions that have an appropriate
> default.
[...]
> Anyone who is bewildered by technical questions should have the
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 11:25:12AM +0200, Ottavio Campana wrote:
> I've just updated to the last version of x backported for woody, 4.2.1-3
Those packages are unofficial and even the guy who built them won't
support them. At least if they're the ones I think they are.
> When I try to launch open
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 01:29:04PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dear Falk and Lists
>
> You'r right, new unstable libc sounds a bit to unstable for me...
>
> Is there any way to replase the xfree86 4.1 in Woody with the 4.2 version,
> without having to be a Debian expert?
>
> I'm copying th
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> MINAMI Hirokazu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Package: xlibs-dbg
>> Version: 4.2.1-3
>> Severity: wishlist
>> I'm suspecting that there's some memory leaks in
>> /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/common/xomGeneric.so.2
>> and need a debugging version of the library.
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> xfree86 4.2.1-4 will B-D on "kernel-headers-2.4.19-386 |
> kernel-headers-2.4 | hurd | freebsd | netbsd | openbsd". This will of
> course only help Linux/i386 people, but it's better than nothing.
FYI that'll break auto-building; sbuild takes the fi
I have been trying to substitute Helvetica font with Arial. I can not
make it work in XftConfig (see attachment please.) Can anybody tell me
what's wrong with my config?
Debian unstable, X 4.2.1-2, libfreetype6 2.1.2-7, ATI rage 128.
I'm not on the list, please cc to me.
Thanks,
- Jiangbin
I've compiled xserver-xfree86 4.2.1-3 for Woody from source packages,
but sitation was even more horrible. But as you can see, I speak about
chipset 86C362, but lspci and X finds 86C368, so I've forced X to use
86C362 via Chipset "86C362" and everything's right now.
--
Medon
jabber:[EMAIL PROTE
>Why don't you do some research before filing
>bugs?
That's a bit like asking "Have you stopped beating your wife yet?".
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=158973&repeatmerged=yes
As a matter of fact, I did read that bug report. It was not clear
to me at the time (and still isn'
> Why don't you do some research before filing
> bugs?
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=158973&repeatmerged=yes
*shrug* I did read that bug report, and, to my mind, it is not
clear that this is indeed the problem.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 11:36:13AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Okay, for m68k I will make x-window-system core depend on
> xserver-xfree86-dbg instead of xserver-xfree86.
isn't xserver-xfree86-dbg compiled without optimisations? That
would be bad on slower m68k machines.
> I beseech you to
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 01:29:04PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > You'r right, new unstable libc sounds a bit to unstable for me...
> >
> > Is there any way to replase the xfree86 4.1 in Woody with the 4.2
> > version, without having to be a Deb
Branden Robinson wrote:
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 01:29:04PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Falk and Lists
You'r right, new unstable libc sounds a bit to unstable for me...
Is there any way to replase the xfree86 4.1 in Woody with the 4.2 version,
without having to be a Debian expert?
I
Hi,
The patch suggested in this bug is flawed on Debian -- startx checks for GNU
in the version string and uses hostname -f, else just hostname, which means
it's expecting the FQDN by default, and if it's GNU (a flawed presumption),
then it explicitely states it wants the FQDN.
The correct fix wo
> > > > ATTENZIONE!
> > > > PRIMA DI GETTARE QUESTA EMAIL
> > > > LEGGI QUESTE POCHE RIGHE.
> > > > E' UNO DEI TORMENTONI DI INTERNET,PERSONALMENTE L'HO RICEVUTO DECINE
> DI
> > > VOLTE, IN INGLESE E IN ITALIANO...
> > > > UN'OCCHIATA PER RICONOSCERE CHE ERA QUESTA LETTERA E...
> > > > CLICK! LA
On Tue, 2002-10-22 at 12:37, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 08:22:13PM -0400, Scott Henson wrote:
> > You are correct, but apt-get build-dep doesn't know this. I have since
> > been educated as to the source of this problem. It is in fact a bug in
> > apt-get build-dep that doe
> > > > ATTENZIONE!
> > > > PRIMA DI GETTARE QUESTA EMAIL
> > > > LEGGI QUESTE POCHE RIGHE.
> > > > E' UNO DEI TORMENTONI DI INTERNET,PERSONALMENTE L'HO RICEVUTO DECINE
> DI
> > > VOLTE, IN INGLESE E IN ITALIANO...
> > > > UN'OCCHIATA PER RICONOSCERE CHE ERA QUESTA LETTERA E...
> > > > CLICK! LA
charset="ISO-8859-1";
charset="ISO-8859-1";
charset="ISO-8859-1";
charset="ISO-8859-1";
charset="ISO-8859-1";
charset="ISO-8859-1";
charset="ISO-8859-1";
charset="ISO-8859-1";
charset="ISO-8859-1";
charset="ISO-8859-1";
charset="ISO-885
I've just updated to the last version of x backported for woody, 4.2.1-3
When I try to launch openoffice I've got the following error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ > openoffice
I18N: X Window System doesn't support locale "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Aborted
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ >
If I do `export LC_ALL="C"' ever
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 11:25:12AM +0200, Ottavio Campana wrote:
> When I try to launch openoffice I've got the following error:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ > openoffice
> I18N: X Window System doesn't support locale "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> Aborted
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ >
>
> If I do `export LC_ALL="C
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 02:28:39PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 06:46:03PM +0200, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
> > I have tested the various releases on m68k, so far it seems
> > the module loading in the X server is still broken on the 68060.
> > The statically linked server
Dear Falk and Lists
You'r right, new unstable libc sounds a bit to unstable for me...
Is there any way to replase the xfree86 4.1 in Woody with the 4.2 version,
without having to be a Debian expert?
I'm copying this to debian-alpha@lists.debian.org and
debian-x@lists.debian.org for further comme
Package: xlibs-dbg
Version: 4.2.1-3
Severity: wishlist
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux lissie 2.4.19 #1 Thu Aug 22 21:43:27 JST 2002 i686 AMD
Athlon(tm) Processor AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
Versions of the packages xlibs-dbg depends on:
hi libfreetype6
There is no need to send me copies of bug reports you file against my
packages. I'll see them because the BTS sends them to me. So, please
don't.
--
G. Branden Robinson| Q: How does a Unix guru have sex?
Debian GNU/Linux | A: unzip;strip;touch;finger;mo
Your message dated Tue, 22 Oct 2002 10:53:20 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#163622: xfree86-common: Error starting X, using Matrox G200
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Your message dated Tue, 22 Oct 2002 10:53:20 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#163622: xfree86-common: Error starting X, using Matrox G200
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 165899 xlibs-dbg: please ship unstripped versions of the Xlib i18n
> support modules
Bug#165899: xlibs-dbg: no unstripped libs for
/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/common/*
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please cont
[There is no need to CC me on mail to debian-x, which I read.]
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 11:25:14AM +0200, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 02:28:39PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 06:46:03PM +0200, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
> > > I have tested the various
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 11:08:38PM +0900, MINAMI Hirokazu wrote:
> Some i18n related libraries included are located under
> /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/common/. However, corresponding unstripped
> libraries do not present in the "xlibs-dbg" package.
You're correct. I apologize for the oversight.
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 08:22:13PM -0400, Scott Henson wrote:
> You are correct, but apt-get build-dep doesn't know this. I have since
> been educated as to the source of this problem. It is in fact a bug in
> apt-get build-dep that doesn't handle OR's very well. Bugs 98640
> 126938 131265 and
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 09:32:43PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> If DEBIAN_PRIORITY is "low", then this is exactly what the user is asking
> for. They want to see everything, even questions that have an appropriate
> default.
[...]
> Anyone who is bewildered by technical questions should have the
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 11:25:12AM +0200, Ottavio Campana wrote:
> I've just updated to the last version of x backported for woody, 4.2.1-3
Those packages are unofficial and even the guy who built them won't
support them. At least if they're the ones I think they are.
> When I try to launch open
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 01:29:04PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dear Falk and Lists
>
> You'r right, new unstable libc sounds a bit to unstable for me...
>
> Is there any way to replase the xfree86 4.1 in Woody with the 4.2 version,
> without having to be a Debian expert?
>
> I'm copying th
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> MINAMI Hirokazu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Package: xlibs-dbg
>> Version: 4.2.1-3
>> Severity: wishlist
>> I'm suspecting that there's some memory leaks in
>> /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/common/xomGeneric.so.2
>> and need a debugging version of the library.
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> xfree86 4.2.1-4 will B-D on "kernel-headers-2.4.19-386 |
> kernel-headers-2.4 | hurd | freebsd | netbsd | openbsd". This will of
> course only help Linux/i386 people, but it's better than nothing.
FYI that'll break auto-building; sbuild takes the fi
I've compiled xserver-xfree86 4.2.1-3 for Woody from source packages,
but sitation was even more horrible. But as you can see, I speak about
chipset 86C362, but lspci and X finds 86C368, so I've forced X to use
86C362 via Chipset "86C362" and everything's right now.
--
Medon
jabber:[EMAIL PROT
I have been trying to substitute Helvetica font with Arial. I can not
make it work in XftConfig (see attachment please.) Can anybody tell me
what's wrong with my config?
Debian unstable, X 4.2.1-2, libfreetype6 2.1.2-7, ATI rage 128.
I'm not on the list, please cc to me.
Thanks,
- Jiangbin
> Why don't you do some research before filing
> bugs?
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=158973&repeatmerged=yes
*shrug* I did read that bug report, and, to my mind, it is not
clear that this is indeed the problem.
>Why don't you do some research before filing
>bugs?
That's a bit like asking "Have you stopped beating your wife yet?".
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=158973&repeatmerged=yes
As a matter of fact, I did read that bug report. It was not clear
to me at the time (and still isn'
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 11:36:13AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Okay, for m68k I will make x-window-system core depend on
> xserver-xfree86-dbg instead of xserver-xfree86.
isn't xserver-xfree86-dbg compiled without optimisations? That
would be bad on slower m68k machines.
> I beseech you to
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 01:29:04PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > You'r right, new unstable libc sounds a bit to unstable for me...
> >
> > Is there any way to replase the xfree86 4.1 in Woody with the 4.2
> > version, without having to be a Deb
Branden Robinson wrote:
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 01:29:04PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Falk and Lists
You'r right, new unstable libc sounds a bit to unstable for me...
Is there any way to replase the xfree86 4.1 in Woody with the 4.2 version,
without having to be a Debian expert?
Hi,
The patch suggested in this bug is flawed on Debian -- startx checks for GNU
in the version string and uses hostname -f, else just hostname, which means
it's expecting the FQDN by default, and if it's GNU (a flawed presumption),
then it explicitely states it wants the FQDN.
The correct fix wo
> > > > ATTENZIONE!
> > > > PRIMA DI GETTARE QUESTA EMAIL
> > > > LEGGI QUESTE POCHE RIGHE.
> > > > E' UNO DEI TORMENTONI DI INTERNET,PERSONALMENTE L'HO RICEVUTO DECINE
> DI
> > > VOLTE, IN INGLESE E IN ITALIANO...
> > > > UN'OCCHIATA PER RICONOSCERE CHE ERA QUESTA LETTERA E...
> > > > CLICK! LA
On Tue, 2002-10-22 at 12:37, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 08:22:13PM -0400, Scott Henson wrote:
> > You are correct, but apt-get build-dep doesn't know this. I have since
> > been educated as to the source of this problem. It is in fact a bug in
> > apt-get build-dep that doe
> > > > ATTENZIONE!
> > > > PRIMA DI GETTARE QUESTA EMAIL
> > > > LEGGI QUESTE POCHE RIGHE.
> > > > E' UNO DEI TORMENTONI DI INTERNET,PERSONALMENTE L'HO RICEVUTO DECINE
> DI
> > > VOLTE, IN INGLESE E IN ITALIANO...
> > > > UN'OCCHIATA PER RICONOSCERE CHE ERA QUESTA LETTERA E...
> > > > CLICK! LA
58 matches
Mail list logo
