On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 05:18, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>
> > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruno BEAUFILS) wrote:
>
> >> Hello,
>
> >> I have a Dell Inspiron 8000 with an ATI Rage Mobility M4 AGP video card.
>
> >> I just installed the dri.sf.net modules (and also their X
> used to have the same problem with 4.x,check out the 4.2 snapshots
> deb http://people.debian.org/~branden/ sid/$(ARCH)/
Thank you.
This is not needed here. Woody 4.1 packages work well. so no need to
install unstable stuff on production workstation. Just the mentioned
option should be added.
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
>Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 12:18:05 +0900
>From: ISHIKAWA Mutsumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cc: debian-x@lists.debian.org
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>Subject: Re: DRI on XFree86 4.x with ATI Rage Mobility
>
>Hi,
>
>>
En réponse à "Mike A. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Just be sure that if you are using any XFree86 4.2.0 release,
> that the 2.4.x kernel you are using must be patched to use
> XFree86 4.2.0 DRM in order to work properly.
Where may I find such a patch ?
Do I have the choice of using something
On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 19:00, Michael Cardenas wrote:
>
> We're trying to use your pre1v1 debs here at lindows, and our qa dept
> found that the intel i810 card is not accelerated for 3d.
>
> I found in /var/log/XFree86.0.log that the i810 X module wanted
> version 1.2.0 of the i810 kernel modul
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 09:57:48PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
...
> > I just wanted to ask if there's a reason that the 4.2.0 pre1v1 debs
> > weren't compiled against the updated 1.2.0 kernel modules?
>
> It's not a matter of compiling against the kernel modules, on the
> contrary the source for
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 01:26:01PM -0700, Michael Cardenas wrote:
> Are you saying that the dri modules in xfree86 need to be compiled
> against the headers of the running kernel?
No, the DRI modules in XFree86 need to be *written* against the new
version of the interface. This is not a compliati
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 08:34:16AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> That's not corrrect, ATI calls all their mobile chips 'Rage Mobility',
> M3 through M5 have a Rage128 core.
Eh? Apple, at any rate, has started calling the newest ATI mobile chips
"Radeon Mobility".
--
G. Branden Robinson
On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 23:44, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 08:34:16AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > That's not corrrect, ATI calls all their mobile chips 'Rage Mobility',
> > M3 through M5 have a Rage128 core.
>
> Eh? Apple, at any rate, has started calling the newest ATI mo
On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 22:26, Michael Cardenas wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 09:57:48PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> ...
> > > I just wanted to ask if there's a reason that the 4.2.0 pre1v1 debs
> > > weren't compiled against the updated 1.2.0 kernel modules?
> >
> > It's not a matter of compil
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Branden Robinson wrote:
>Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 16:44:10 -0500
>From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: debian-x@lists.debian.org
>Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
> protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oplxJGu+Ee5xywIT"
>Subject: Re: D
11 matches
Mail list logo
