Re: testers wanted for xfree86 4.1.0-14pre15v1

2002-03-09 Thread Branden Robinson
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 06:48:48PM -0600, Colin Watson wrote: > On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 05:17:13PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > Experimental versions of the X packages are available at my repository. > > > > Please test these so that 4.1.0-15 can be a solid release, worthy of the > > woody r

Re: testers wanted for xfree86 4.1.0-14pre15v1

2002-03-09 Thread Chris Waters
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 02:21:57AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > Hrm. Shouldn't dpkg-shlibdeps use the shlibs files of the building > libraries (thanks to -l), rather than the ones on the system? I don't think so -- at least, I seem to recall having problems getting it to do The Right Thing.

Re: testers wanted for xfree86 4.1.0-14pre15v1

2002-03-09 Thread Ralf Treinen
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 05:17:13PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > Please test these so that 4.1.0-15 can be a solid release, worthy of the > woody release. Please direct feedback to the debian-x list. For me, the upgrade from 4.1.0-14 went completely smoothly. -Ralf.

Re: testers wanted for xfree86 4.1.0-14pre15v1

2002-03-09 Thread Colin Watson
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 02:21:57AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > $ ls -1 debian/tmp/usr/X11R6/lib/libGL* > debian/tmp/usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.a > debian/tmp/usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so > debian/tmp/usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1 > debian/tmp/usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1.2 > debian/tmp/usr/X11R6/lib/libGLU.a > debi

Re: testers wanted for xfree86 4.1.0-14pre15v1

2002-03-09 Thread Branden Robinson
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 03:55:31PM +, Colin Watson wrote: > shlibs.local has something different, though: D'oh, forgot about that. > It probably just needs to be resynced. I think you're probably right. I'll resync and rebuild after downgrading to -14. Thanks for the help! -- G. Branden

Re: testers wanted for xfree86 4.1.0-14pre15v1

2002-03-09 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 05:17:13PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > The sooner I can put this release to bed, the sooner I can work > on > 4.2.0. > > Experimental versions of the X packages are available at my repository. > > Please test these so that 4.1.0-15 can be a solid release, worthy of

Re: testers wanted for xfree86 4.1.0-14pre15v1

2002-03-09 Thread Chris Waters
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 02:21:57AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > Hrm. Shouldn't dpkg-shlibdeps use the shlibs files of the building > libraries (thanks to -l), rather than the ones on the system? I don't think so -- at least, I seem to recall having problems getting it to do The Right Thing.

Re: testers wanted for xfree86 4.1.0-14pre15v1

2002-03-09 Thread Ralf Treinen
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 05:17:13PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > Please test these so that 4.1.0-15 can be a solid release, worthy of the > woody release. Please direct feedback to the debian-x list. For me, the upgrade from 4.1.0-14 went completely smoothly. -Ralf. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema

Re: testers wanted for xfree86 4.1.0-14pre15v1

2002-03-09 Thread Colin Watson
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 02:21:57AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > $ ls -1 debian/tmp/usr/X11R6/lib/libGL* > debian/tmp/usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.a > debian/tmp/usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so > debian/tmp/usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1 > debian/tmp/usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1.2 > debian/tmp/usr/X11R6/lib/libGLU.a > deb

Re: testers wanted for xfree86 4.1.0-14pre15v1

2002-03-09 Thread Branden Robinson
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 03:55:31PM +, Colin Watson wrote: > shlibs.local has something different, though: D'oh, forgot about that. > It probably just needs to be resynced. I think you're probably right. I'll resync and rebuild after downgrading to -14. Thanks for the help! -- G. Branden

Re: testers wanted for xfree86 4.1.0-14pre15v1

2002-03-09 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 05:17:13PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > The sooner I can put this release to bed, the sooner I can work on > 4.2.0. > > Experimental versions of the X packages are available at my repository. > > Please test these so that 4.1.0-15 can be a solid release, worthy of th