Re: promising news regarding the XFree86 4.x server on m68k

At 4:59 -0500 8/9/01, Branden Robinson wrote: I was, I think, wrong about how much work needs to be done to get the XFree86 X server working on m68k. As far as I can tell from the source code to XFree86's module loader, support code for m68k already exists. The issue is, apparently, just that i

Re: promising news regarding the XFree86 4.x server on m68k

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Erik van Roode writes: >I've tried finding more information on how the loader is supposed to work >(specifically for m68k), but the most recent ELF specification I could find wa >s >1.2 published May 1995. Does anyone have some useful links? The ELF standard hasn't

Re: promising news regarding the XFree86 4.x server on m68k

At 4:59 -0500 8/9/01, Branden Robinson wrote: >I was, I think, wrong about how much work needs to be done to get the >XFree86 X server working on m68k. > >As far as I can tell from the source code to XFree86's module loader, >support code for m68k already exists. The issue is, apparently, just >t

Re: promising news regarding the XFree86 4.x server on m68k

In message , Erik van Roode writes: >I've tried finding more information on how the loader is supposed to work >(specifically for m68k), but the most recent ELF specification I could find wa >s >1.2 published May 1995. Does anyone have some useful links? The