Re: debian 2.2 "potato" builds of the 4.1.0-9 debs available

2001-11-12 Thread Scott Dier
* Charl P. Botha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011108 16:35]: > UNOFFICIAL builds of Branden's official XFree86 4.1.0-9 debs are available. > See http://people.debian.org/~cpbotha/xf410_potato/READ.THIS Is there a reason these shouldn't be versioned 9potato1 so if someone uses a automated bug tool that bra

Re: debian 2.2 "potato" builds of the 4.1.0-9 debs available

2001-11-12 Thread Branden Robinson
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 10:36:20AM -0600, Scott Dier wrote: > * Charl P. Botha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011108 16:35]: > > UNOFFICIAL builds of Branden's official XFree86 4.1.0-9 debs are available. > > See http://people.debian.org/~cpbotha/xf410_potato/READ.THIS > > Is there a reason these shouldn't

Re: debian 2.2 "potato" builds of the 4.1.0-9 debs available

2001-11-12 Thread Andreas Metzler
Scott Dier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Charl P. Botha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011108 16:35]: >> UNOFFICIAL builds of Branden's official XFree86 4.1.0-9 debs are available. >> See http://people.debian.org/~cpbotha/xf410_potato/READ.THIS > Is there a reason these shouldn't be versioned 9potato1 so i

Re: debian 2.2 "potato" builds of the 4.1.0-9 debs available

2001-11-12 Thread Scott Dier
* Charl P. Botha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011108 16:35]: > UNOFFICIAL builds of Branden's official XFree86 4.1.0-9 debs are available. > See http://people.debian.org/~cpbotha/xf410_potato/READ.THIS Is there a reason these shouldn't be versioned 9potato1 so if someone uses a automated bug tool that br

Re: debian 2.2 "potato" builds of the 4.1.0-9 debs available

2001-11-12 Thread Branden Robinson
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 10:36:20AM -0600, Scott Dier wrote: > * Charl P. Botha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011108 16:35]: > > UNOFFICIAL builds of Branden's official XFree86 4.1.0-9 debs are available. > > See http://people.debian.org/~cpbotha/xf410_potato/READ.THIS > > Is there a reason these shouldn't

Re: debian 2.2 "potato" builds of the 4.1.0-9 debs available

2001-11-12 Thread Andreas Metzler
Scott Dier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Charl P. Botha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011108 16:35]: >> UNOFFICIAL builds of Branden's official XFree86 4.1.0-9 debs are available. >> See http://people.debian.org/~cpbotha/xf410_potato/READ.THIS > Is there a reason these shouldn't be versioned 9potato1 so