Status report - X 4.1.0

Hey, I recently upgraded to 4.1.0-0pre1v1.3, and found that on startx, the X server would get a Signal 11, and terminate. This didn't happen with 4.0.[123], so I started debugging, and found by using the 4.0.3 version of /usr/X11R6/lib/libvgahw.o, that it still trapped a sig11, but it told me

recent gnome apps _slow_ and network access

running debian unstable w/ gnome gui recently (past few weeks) upgraded gnome apps started taking 5 to 10 seconds to crank up. Logging onto X via gnome takes close to a minute for my desktop to come up. The network gets beat on in the process (watching idiot lights on my cable modem). Switching

Re: [summary] Re: results using xfree86 4.1.0-0pre1v1 on sparc

Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thanks for confirming these changes, Adam. Once we've slain the XKB beast, > (or at least tiptoed around it carefully) dexconf should be pretty nice for > SPARC users. Excellent. Sorry I can't give you the proper XKB info you need. Sorry I keep co

Status report - X 4.1.0

Hey, I recently upgraded to 4.1.0-0pre1v1.3, and found that on startx, the X server would get a Signal 11, and terminate. This didn't happen with 4.0.[123], so I started debugging, and found by using the 4.0.3 version of /usr/X11R6/lib/libvgahw.o, that it still trapped a sig11, but it told me

recent gnome apps _slow_ and network access

running debian unstable w/ gnome gui recently (past few weeks) upgraded gnome apps started taking 5 to 10 seconds to crank up. Logging onto X via gnome takes close to a minute for my desktop to come up. The network gets beat on in the process (watching idiot lights on my cable modem). Switching

Re: [summary] Re: results using xfree86 4.1.0-0pre1v1 on sparc

Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thanks for confirming these changes, Adam. Once we've slain the XKB beast, > (or at least tiptoed around it carefully) dexconf should be pretty nice for > SPARC users. Excellent. Sorry I can't give you the proper XKB info you need. Sorry I keep c