>> Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> http://www.xfree86.org/~alanh/
>
> until it's merged into the Linux kernel.
Actually the xfree86 packages should provide a modules-dri-src kind of
package. That would stop much of this madness. And no, "run the
latest and greatest kernel" is
Paonia Ezrine wrote:
>
> I am running my screen in 600x800 mode by it get a biger screen that I can
> see by moving over or up or down or whatever. I dont want this. How can I
> turn this off?
Remove the bigger modes from Subsection "Display".
And next time, please read some documentation and in
"Marcelo E. Magallon" wrote:
>
> >> Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > http://www.xfree86.org/~alanh/
> >
> > until it's merged into the Linux kernel.
>
> Actually the xfree86 packages should provide a modules-dri-src kind of
> package. That would stop much of this madness.
W
>> Michel D?nzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > And no, "run the latest and greatest kernel" is not an option for most
> > people.
>
> The current DRM code doesn't even build with 2.2 if you mean that.
I know, but no, I don't mean that. In the current status some people
just can't affor
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 12:36:22AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> cp debian/MANIFEST.m68k.new debian/MANIFEST.m68k
> fakeroot debian/rules binary-arch
Thanks!
> > So for the
> > build has run fine, didn't need any patches. Do we have hope that
> > somebody fixed the module loader for m68k?
>
In both 4.0.3 and 4.1.0, the X server would spin using 100% of the CPU
on my IBM ThinkPad 600 (NM 2160). Turning on Option "NoAccel" stopped
this, but performance was unacceptable. None of the various "xaaNo*"
options I found in the archives seemed to help.
Finally, I found that using
Op
Thanks to Ben's advice, I paste below a diff output between the XF86Config-4
file that dexter produced, and the one that finally worked. I wish I
had some time and debconf hacking skills, so I could provide you with
a patch to dexter, but I'm afraid I have neither.
Summary:
- need dexter op
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 11:25:22AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Thanks to Ben's advice, I paste below a diff output between the XF86Config-4
> file that dexter produced, and the one that finally worked. I wish I
> had some time and debconf hacking skills, so I could provide you with
> a patch
When X exits (tdfx) it causes all my usb devices to stop working until I
unplug them + plug them back in. This persists in text mode and X.
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Please use PGP/GPG encryption to send me mail.
"Any technology, no matter how primitive, is magic to those who don't
understand
>> Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> http://www.xfree86.org/~alanh/
>
> until it's merged into the Linux kernel.
Actually the xfree86 packages should provide a modules-dri-src kind of
package. That would stop much of this madness. And no, "run the
latest and greatest kernel" i
Paonia Ezrine wrote:
>
> I am running my screen in 600x800 mode by it get a biger screen that I can
> see by moving over or up or down or whatever. I dont want this. How can I
> turn this off?
Remove the bigger modes from Subsection "Display".
And next time, please read some documentation and i
"Marcelo E. Magallon" wrote:
>
> >> Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > http://www.xfree86.org/~alanh/
> >
> > until it's merged into the Linux kernel.
>
> Actually the xfree86 packages should provide a modules-dri-src kind of
> package. That would stop much of this madness.
>> Michel D?nzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > And no, "run the latest and greatest kernel" is not an option for most
> > people.
>
> The current DRM code doesn't even build with 2.2 if you mean that.
I know, but no, I don't mean that. In the current status some people
just can't affo
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 12:36:22AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> cp debian/MANIFEST.m68k.new debian/MANIFEST.m68k
> fakeroot debian/rules binary-arch
Thanks!
> > So for the
> > build has run fine, didn't need any patches. Do we have hope that
> > somebody fixed the module loader for m68k?
In both 4.0.3 and 4.1.0, the X server would spin using 100% of the CPU
on my IBM ThinkPad 600 (NM 2160). Turning on Option "NoAccel" stopped
this, but performance was unacceptable. None of the various "xaaNo*"
options I found in the archives seemed to help.
Finally, I found that using
O
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 11:25:22AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Thanks to Ben's advice, I paste below a diff output between the XF86Config-4
> file that dexter produced, and the one that finally worked. I wish I
> had some time and debconf hacking skills, so I could provide you with
> a patch
When X exits (tdfx) it causes all my usb devices to stop working until I
unplug them + plug them back in. This persists in text mode and X.
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Please use PGP/GPG encryption to send me mail.
"Any technology, no matter how primitive, is magic to those who don't
understand
Thanks to Ben's advice, I paste below a diff output between the XF86Config-4
file that dexter produced, and the one that finally worked. I wish I
had some time and debconf hacking skills, so I could provide you with
a patch to dexter, but I'm afraid I have neither.
Summary:
- need dexter o
18 matches
Mail list logo
