On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 04:06:47PM +0100, Daniele Medri - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
> I've just installed xfree 4.0.2-1 on woody.
> What may i enable to see xterm with antialiased fonts.. or antialiased font
> everywhere in X?
Try 'xterm -fa Courier'.
Also there is a small HOWTO in /usr/doc/k
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 12:42:21PM -0600, Thomas E. Vaughan wrote:
>
> Maybe I failed to do something that I was supposed to do, but dri is
> disabled for me.
>
> DRM version = 2.0.1, expected 3.0.x
> DRI disabled.
There was (at least) a major DRI merge dated around the 3rd week of marsch, so
mu
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 02:03:32PM -0500, Stuart Ballard wrote:
> "Thomas E. Vaughan" wrote:
> >
> > Maybe I failed to do something that I was supposed to do, but dri is
> > disabled for me.
> >
> > DRM version = 2.0.1, expected 3.0.x
> > DRI disabled.
>
> What kernel are you using?
>
> Sounds
I'm trying to make sense of the way X is handling the keyboard, via xkb. I
want to be able to setup something like xkbsel to switch between a latin and
cyrillic keyboard. (Cyrillic docs usually recommend using xruskb, but from
what I understand, it is, as the russians might say, somewhat "otstoin
DP> I'm trying to make sense of the way X is handling the keyboard,
DP> via xkb. I want to be able to setup something like xkbsel to
DP> switch between a latin and cyrillic keyboard. (Cyrillic docs
DP> usually recommend using xruskb, but from what I understand, it is,
DP> as the russians might s
> "Joseph" == Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joseph> If you have a 3dfx card, you probably should be using CVS
Joseph> DRI, which can be made not too painful (but will uglify
Joseph> your XF86Config-4 file a bit..)
Is the same true for Voodoo5?
--
Stephen
"If I claime
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 12:17:07AM -0800, Stephen Zander wrote:
> > "Joseph" == Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Joseph> If you have a 3dfx card, you probably should be using CVS
> Joseph> DRI, which can be made not too painful (but will uglify
> Joseph> your XF86Config-4
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 12:17:07AM -0800, Stephen Zander wrote:
> Joseph> If you have a 3dfx card, you probably should be using CVS
> Joseph> DRI, which can be made not too painful (but will uglify
> Joseph> your XF86Config-4 file a bit..)
>
> Is the same true for Voodoo5?
Most assure
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 11:52:51AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> 1) 4.0.2-12 for i386 is broken. Just building against libc6 2.2.2-2 is
> insufficient to avoid the gcc/binutils problem that BenC warned about in
> debian-devel.
Installing gcc 2.95.3-9 makes things suitable for building on i386
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 08:39:31PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 11:52:51AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > 1) 4.0.2-12 for i386 is broken. Just building against libc6 2.2.2-2 is
> > insufficient to avoid the gcc/binutils problem that BenC warned about in
> > debian-devel.
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 11:34:48PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 08:39:31PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 11:52:51AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > 1) 4.0.2-12 for i386 is broken. Just building against libc6 2.2.2-2 is
> > > insufficient to
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 11:39:05PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 11:34:48PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > So the version of libc6-dev I build against is irrelevant?
>
> As long as you have gcc 2.95.3-9 installed, yes.
Okay, thanks. Cookin' 4.0.2-13 as we speak.
--
G.
On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 04:06:47PM +0100, Daniele Medri - [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I've just installed xfree 4.0.2-1 on woody.
> What may i enable to see xterm with antialiased fonts.. or antialiased font
>everywhere in X?
Try 'xterm -fa Courier'.
Also there is a small HOWTO in /usr/doc/ko
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 12:42:21PM -0600, Thomas E. Vaughan wrote:
>
> Maybe I failed to do something that I was supposed to do, but dri is
> disabled for me.
>
> DRM version = 2.0.1, expected 3.0.x
> DRI disabled.
There was (at least) a major DRI merge dated around the 3rd week of marsch, so
m
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 02:03:32PM -0500, Stuart Ballard wrote:
> "Thomas E. Vaughan" wrote:
> >
> > Maybe I failed to do something that I was supposed to do, but dri is
> > disabled for me.
> >
> > DRM version = 2.0.1, expected 3.0.x
> > DRI disabled.
>
> What kernel are you using?
>
> Sounds
I'm trying to make sense of the way X is handling the keyboard, via xkb. I
want to be able to setup something like xkbsel to switch between a latin and
cyrillic keyboard. (Cyrillic docs usually recommend using xruskb, but from
what I understand, it is, as the russians might say, somewhat "otstoi
DP> I'm trying to make sense of the way X is handling the keyboard,
DP> via xkb. I want to be able to setup something like xkbsel to
DP> switch between a latin and cyrillic keyboard. (Cyrillic docs
DP> usually recommend using xruskb, but from what I understand, it is,
DP> as the russians might
> "Joseph" == Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joseph> If you have a 3dfx card, you probably should be using CVS
Joseph> DRI, which can be made not too painful (but will uglify
Joseph> your XF86Config-4 file a bit..)
Is the same true for Voodoo5?
--
Stephen
"If I claim
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 12:17:07AM -0800, Stephen Zander wrote:
> > "Joseph" == Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Joseph> If you have a 3dfx card, you probably should be using CVS
> Joseph> DRI, which can be made not too painful (but will uglify
> Joseph> your XF86Config-
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 12:17:07AM -0800, Stephen Zander wrote:
> Joseph> If you have a 3dfx card, you probably should be using CVS
> Joseph> DRI, which can be made not too painful (but will uglify
> Joseph> your XF86Config-4 file a bit..)
>
> Is the same true for Voodoo5?
Most assur
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 11:52:51AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> 1) 4.0.2-12 for i386 is broken. Just building against libc6 2.2.2-2 is
> insufficient to avoid the gcc/binutils problem that BenC warned about in
> debian-devel.
Installing gcc 2.95.3-9 makes things suitable for building on i386
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 11:52:51AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> 1) 4.0.2-12 for i386 is broken. Just building against libc6 2.2.2-2 is
> insufficient to avoid the gcc/binutils problem that BenC warned about in
> debian-devel.
Installing gcc 2.95.3-9 makes things suitable for building on i386
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 08:39:31PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 11:52:51AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > 1) 4.0.2-12 for i386 is broken. Just building against libc6 2.2.2-2 is
> > insufficient to avoid the gcc/binutils problem that BenC warned about in
> > debian-devel
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 11:34:48PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 08:39:31PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 11:52:51AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > 1) 4.0.2-12 for i386 is broken. Just building against libc6 2.2.2-2 is
> > > insufficient to
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 11:39:05PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 11:34:48PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > So the version of libc6-dev I build against is irrelevant?
>
> As long as you have gcc 2.95.3-9 installed, yes.
Okay, thanks. Cookin' 4.0.2-13 as we speak.
--
G
i386 is uploaded. powerpc and sparc are compiling right now.
alpha, arm, and m68k, please compile this for your architectures.
Changes:
xfree86 (4.0.2-13) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* build using gcc 2.95.3-9 (see #92008)
* debian/local/dexconf: don't freak out if the selected mode li
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Branden Robinson wrote:
> i386 is uploaded. powerpc and sparc are compiling right now.
>
> alpha, arm, and m68k, please compile this for your architectures.
FYI, it will have to wait until a gcc build binary-arch problem is
resolved. Matthias is already working on a fix.
27 matches
Mail list logo
