Hi,
I was just browsing the FHS 2.2 public review document and found this:
759 3.7.5.2 Specific Options
760
761 The following files, or symbolic links to files, must be in /etc/X11 if
762 the corresponding subsystem is installed:
763
764 Xconfig The configuration file for early versions
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 05:02:59PM +0100, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was just browsing the FHS 2.2 public review document and found this:
>
> 759 3.7.5.2 Specific Options
> 760
> 761 The following files, or symbolic links to files, must be in /etc/X11 if
> 762 the corresponding sub
>> Jon Pennington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was under the impression that the XFree86 rules would override FHS
> rules, at least until FHS is back up to speed on what applications
> need to run.
a) I don't get whay you mean; b) this is FHS "getting up to speed"
> In accordance with t
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 10:37:07PM +0100, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> >> Jon Pennington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I was under the impression that the XFree86 rules would override FHS
> > rules, at least until FHS is back up to speed on what applications
> > need to run.
>
> a) I don'
Hi,
I was just browsing the FHS 2.2 public review document and found this:
759 3.7.5.2 Specific Options
760
761 The following files, or symbolic links to files, must be in /etc/X11 if
762 the corresponding subsystem is installed:
763
764 Xconfig The configuration file for early versions
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 05:02:59PM +0100, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was just browsing the FHS 2.2 public review document and found this:
>
> 759 3.7.5.2 Specific Options
> 760
> 761 The following files, or symbolic links to files, must be in /etc/X11 if
> 762 the corresponding su
>> Jon Pennington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was under the impression that the XFree86 rules would override FHS
> rules, at least until FHS is back up to speed on what applications
> need to run.
a) I don't get whay you mean; b) this is FHS "getting up to speed"
> In accordance with
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 10:37:07PM +0100, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> >> Jon Pennington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I was under the impression that the XFree86 rules would override FHS
> > rules, at least until FHS is back up to speed on what applications
> > need to run.
>
> a) I don
JP> If XFree86 says `put this file here' and FHS says `put that file
JP> here instead', I'd be inclined to do what XFree86 says.
To my knowledge, the XFree86 core team has said no such thing. While
I am not entitled to speak for the core team, I am pretty sure most
core team members don't give a
9 matches
Mail list logo
