Hi list,
I was trying to get my ttf fonts working on my woody box. For this to
function, I copied all my ttfs into a newly made directory "TrueType" in
/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts and did a ttmkfdir -o fonts.dir there. In addition I
supplied my XF86Config with a FontPath "..." to this directory.
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 11:07:10AM -0700, Joshua Shagam wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 12:48:32PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 10:28:44AM -0700, Joshua Shagam wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 12:07:31PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > >
> > > > No, it doesn't. X depe
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 12:07:31PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> No, it doesn't. X depedns on glibc 2.2 (which is not in woody because of
> m68k) and it also does not build on all of our supported archs (m68k and
> arm).
Always on the small ones... X depends on glibc2.2? How could I build X on
m68
Michael Meding wrote:
>
> Hi list,
>
> I was trying to get my ttf fonts working on my woody box. For this to
> function, I copied all my ttfs into a newly made directory "TrueType" in
> /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts and did a ttmkfdir -o fonts.dir there. In addition I
> supplied my XF86Config with a F
"Christian T. Steigies" wrote:
>
> > So there is no way it can be in testing.
> So it goes stable -> woody -> testing -> sid ? Which one should developers
> run?
Stable (Potato) <- Testing (Woody) <- Unstable (Sid)
You should probably be running whichever distribution your packages are
built for
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Michael Meding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi list,
>> I was trying to get my ttf fonts working on my woody box. For this to
>> function, I copied all my ttfs into a newly made directory "TrueType" in
>> /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts and did a ttmkfdir -o fonts
Am Donnerstag, 21. Dezember 2000 08:31 schrieb Michael Meding:
> Hi list,
>
> I was trying to get my ttf fonts working on my woody box. For this to
> function, I copied all my ttfs into a newly made directory "TrueType" in
> /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts and did a ttmkfdir -o fonts.dir there. In additio
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone has had much luck getting DRI working with
2.4.0-test11 and the latest unstable deb's, my glxinfo says it's
working, but when I run evas_test and put it into hardware mode my X
completely freeses and I need to telnet in from another machine to
restart my computer.
Hi,
I have a new problem with my self built X on m68k
XFree86 Version 4.0.2 (RC3) / X Window System
(protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6400)
Release Date: 14 December 2000
If the server is older than 6-12 months, or if your card is
newer than the above date, look for
On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 09:54:25PM +0100, Christian T . Steigies wrote:
> Symbol memcpy from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a is
> unresolved!
>
> Fatal server error:
> Caught signal 11. Server aborting
>
[...]
>
> I do have some heavy dependency problems, so not all X packages
On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 06:06:28PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> >
> > BenC said X4.0 requires glibc-2.2. Is that a real requiry or does this
> > exist only because you need some libc to build X? If its the latter, I could
> > downgrade my libc6 again and build RC4 with the proven version?
>
>
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 11:07:10AM -0700, Joshua Shagam wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 12:48:32PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 10:28:44AM -0700, Joshua Shagam wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 12:07:31PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > >
> > > > No, it doesn't. X dep
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 12:07:31PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> No, it doesn't. X depedns on glibc 2.2 (which is not in woody because of
> m68k) and it also does not build on all of our supported archs (m68k and
> arm).
Always on the small ones... X depends on glibc2.2? How could I build X on
m6
Michael Meding wrote:
>
> Hi list,
>
> I was trying to get my ttf fonts working on my woody box. For this to
> function, I copied all my ttfs into a newly made directory "TrueType" in
> /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts and did a ttmkfdir -o fonts.dir there. In addition I
> supplied my XF86Config with a
"Christian T. Steigies" wrote:
>
> > So there is no way it can be in testing.
> So it goes stable -> woody -> testing -> sid ? Which one should developers
> run?
Stable (Potato) <- Testing (Woody) <- Unstable (Sid)
You should probably be running whichever distribution your packages are
built fo
> In <00122108313100.16005@Hal>
> Michael Meding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi list,
>> I was trying to get my ttf fonts working on my woody box. For this to
>> function, I copied all my ttfs into a newly made directory "TrueType" in
>> /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts and did a ttmkfdir
Am Donnerstag, 21. Dezember 2000 08:31 schrieb Michael Meding:
> Hi list,
>
> I was trying to get my ttf fonts working on my woody box. For this to
> function, I copied all my ttfs into a newly made directory "TrueType" in
> /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts and did a ttmkfdir -o fonts.dir there. In additi
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone has had much luck getting DRI working with
2.4.0-test11 and the latest unstable deb's, my glxinfo says it's
working, but when I run evas_test and put it into hardware mode my X
completely freeses and I need to telnet in from another machine to
restart my computer.
Hi,
I have a new problem with my self built X on m68k
XFree86 Version 4.0.2 (RC3) / X Window System
(protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6400)
Release Date: 14 December 2000
If the server is older than 6-12 months, or if your card is
newer than the above date, look for
On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 09:54:25PM +0100, Christian T . Steigies wrote:
> Symbol memcpy from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a is unresolved!
>
> Fatal server error:
> Caught signal 11. Server aborting
>
[...]
>
> I do have some heavy dependency problems, so not all X packages ar
On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 06:06:28PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> >
> > BenC said X4.0 requires glibc-2.2. Is that a real requiry or does this
> > exist only because you need some libc to build X? If its the latter, I could
> > downgrade my libc6 again and build RC4 with the proven version?
>
21 matches
Mail list logo
