[this email is almost entirely useless.]
I am off for winter break in a very short time. Once the debian web
servers are back online, I am going to unsubscribe from debian-x -- best
of luck to the regulars covering the myriad questions people manage to
ask. :) I figured a heads-up was in order
Is anyone else using a USB mouse with 4.0.1-12? I have got it working with
gpm from console, so I know I have all the modules running (under 2.4.0-t12),
but when I stop gpm and try to use the device, /dev/input/mouse0 directly, it
dosen't work.
Now I have read and re-read /usr/share/doc/xserve
On Sun, Dec 17, 2000 at 01:52:35AM +0800, James Bromberger wrote:
> Is anyone else using a USB mouse with 4.0.1-12? I have got it working with
> gpm from console, so I know I have all the modules running (under 2.4.0-t12),
> but when I stop gpm and try to use the device, /dev/input/mouse0 directl
On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 07:00:52PM +0100, Charl P. Botha wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 17, 2000 at 01:52:35AM +0800, James Bromberger wrote:
> Read some more. :) /dev/input/mouse? and /dev/input/mice are PS/2
> "compatible" interfaces.
> Please see /usr/src/linux/Documentation/usb/input.txt for details: y
On Sun, Dec 17, 2000 at 02:11:43AM +0800, James Bromberger wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 07:00:52PM +0100, Charl P. Botha wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 17, 2000 at 01:52:35AM +0800, James Bromberger wrote:
> > Read some more. :) /dev/input/mouse? and /dev/input/mice are PS/2
> > "compatible" interfaces
unsubscribe
"Antonio M. D'souza" wrote:
> Ok, now I'm at a total loss!
> I tried to remove ghostview as it contained a symlink that was conflicting
> with xlibs but it gave me this (meaning I can no longer remove anything):
>
> quikbox:/home/quik# apt-get remove ghostview
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Bui
Hello, all-
I've had similar but sporadic dependency problems with the new X debs.
apt-get hasn't been too successful in resolving things properly, even when
the dependencies indicate a solution. My guess is that the complexity of
X dependencies is really pushing apt-get, and apt-get -f is no hel
Dave, I had to put in this:
DPkg::Options {"--force-overwrite";};
into /etc/apt/apt.conf. It's worked quite well for me.
--
** Derek J Witt**
* Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *
* Home Page: http://www.flinthills.c
Is anyone else using a USB mouse with 4.0.1-12? I have got it working with
gpm from console, so I know I have all the modules running (under 2.4.0-t12),
but when I stop gpm and try to use the device, /dev/input/mouse0 directly, it
dosen't work.
Now I have read and re-read /usr/share/doc/xserv
On Sun, Dec 17, 2000 at 01:52:35AM +0800, James Bromberger wrote:
> Is anyone else using a USB mouse with 4.0.1-12? I have got it working with
> gpm from console, so I know I have all the modules running (under 2.4.0-t12),
> but when I stop gpm and try to use the device, /dev/input/mouse0 direct
On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 07:00:52PM +0100, Charl P. Botha wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 17, 2000 at 01:52:35AM +0800, James Bromberger wrote:
> Read some more. :) /dev/input/mouse? and /dev/input/mice are PS/2
> "compatible" interfaces.
> Please see /usr/src/linux/Documentation/usb/input.txt for details:
On Sun, Dec 17, 2000 at 02:11:43AM +0800, James Bromberger wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 07:00:52PM +0100, Charl P. Botha wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 17, 2000 at 01:52:35AM +0800, James Bromberger wrote:
> > Read some more. :) /dev/input/mouse? and /dev/input/mice are PS/2
> > "compatible" interface
unsubscribe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Antonio M. D'souza" wrote:
> Ok, now I'm at a total loss!
> I tried to remove ghostview as it contained a symlink that was conflicting
> with xlibs but it gave me this (meaning I can no longer remove anything):
>
> quikbox:/home/quik# apt-get remove ghostview
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Bu
Hello, all-
I've had similar but sporadic dependency problems with the new X debs.
apt-get hasn't been too successful in resolving things properly, even when
the dependencies indicate a solution. My guess is that the complexity of
X dependencies is really pushing apt-get, and apt-get -f is no he
Dave, I had to put in this:
DPkg::Options {"--force-overwrite";};
into /etc/apt/apt.conf. It's worked quite well for me.
--
** Derek J Witt**
* Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *
* Home Page: http://www.flinthills.
[this email is almost entirely useless.]
I am off for winter break in a very short time. Once the debian web
servers are back online, I am going to unsubscribe from debian-x -- best
of luck to the regulars covering the myriad questions people manage to
ask. :) I figured a heads-up was in order...
18 matches
Mail list logo
